FTC Claims CAN-SPAM Act Works

By Ed Oswald | Published December 21, 2005, 11:08 AM

The Federal Trade Commission said on Tuesday that the CAN-SPAM Act has worked, and was effective in protecting consumers from unsolicited e-mail. The agency publicly released a report at a press conference in Washington that studied the effectiveness of the law.

Also announced were three new lawsuits against spam operators who were attempting to sell prescription medication, mortgage offers and a product called Fuel Saver Pro. According to the FTC, Microsoft has provided assistance in all three cases.

While CAN-SPAM may be effective in protecting consumers, studies from anti-spam companies still show a marked increase -- 62 percent -- in the amount of spam messages being sent.

The law has given the government broader powers to combat spammers and take legal action against those who do not follow certain procedures for the sending of bulk e-mail. These procedures include a way for consumers to opt out of e-mails from the sender, as well as the sender's postal address being listed on the message.

It was hard to determine if these procedures were doing any good against spam, or rather it was technology that was helping to curb the flood of unsolicited e-mail, FTC director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection Lydia Parnes said.

Some believe the law needs to be tightened, and that consumers should opt-in to receive commercial e-mail rather than the current opt-out process. Others claim that the only groups that are concerned with compliance are those that actually are legitimate bulk e-mail companies, rather than the spammers themselves.

The FTC maintains that the law does not need to be changed.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

If by works you mean I can buy SPAM in a CAN, then yes, I did so just the other day.

Score: 0

|

i like how theres no actual proof of this. i have a great filter for my email but most web based email has gotten worse if anything. i checked an old yahoo acount i check one in a great while. i clean it out about once a month. i had about 5500 junk in my bulk folder of just spam. yea great job.

Score: 0

|

Ha ahahaha aha aha ahaha....

Apparently the FTC has good filters, therefore it MUST be getting better...

Is it April 1st?

Score: 0

|

"effective in protecting consumers from unsolicited e-mail."

I'd really, really like to know how they came to that marvellous conclusion.

Score: 0

|

Yeah. I've actually been getting MORE spam in recent weeks.

Score: 0

|

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Google acquires Gizmo5, builds IP telephony portfolio

Google Voice today confirmed rumors that it would acquire IP telephony company Gizmo5

'A pivot from war to peace:' The AMD + Intel armistice, in their own words

An extraordinary day in technology history is recognized by two long-time rivals that mutually decided it's futile to fight anyplace else except the marketplace.

PS3, Xbox to soon get Twitter, Facebook integration

Both Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Sony's PlayStation 3 will integrate with Facebook in the near future.

The iTunes App Store at 100,000: Can we stop counting, already?

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Is a six-digit number truly reflective of a healthy applications ecosystem? Or is it another type of bloat?

Analysis: The end of business-by-litigation?

The AMD v. Intel case ended neither with a bang nor a whimper, but almost with a song. Is it catchy enough for the rest of the PC world to sing in perfect harmony?

The agreement: Intel and AMD 'wipe the slate clean'

As the Securities and Exchange Commission document shows, AMD did indeed make some compromises in favor of Intel, especially with regard to conduct.

EC still holds Intel accountable even after AMD settlement

Though the future of relations between AMD and Intel may be peaceful now, the EC believes Intel may still owe restitution for its past conduct.