First Mac OS X Virus? Apple Says No

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

February 17, 2006, 11:28 AM

Loyalists on both sides of the Mac versus Windows debate shot into action Thursday following news that the first virus had been spotted for Apple's operating system. The malware, dubbed Leap.A, spreads through iChat and infects local applications. But Apple downplayed the threat, saying malicious software is different from a virus.

According to security firm F-Secure, Leap.A is simply a standard executable compiled for Mac OS X. It is distributed as an archive called latestpics.tgz. "First it drops an icon resource and an external hook bundle which is used for spreading through iChat," the company said in an advisory.

Once Leap.A is activated, when any iChat user changes his or her status, the worm initiates a file transfer for the latestpics.tgz archive. The file transfer takes place in the background and is hidden from the user.

In addition, the malware replaces all applications that have been used in the last month with itself, saving the original executable as a resource fork with the same filename. According to F-Secure, "When the application is opened the worm activates first, then it runs the original application from the resource fork."

Leap.A first cropped up on a MacRumors forum, purportedly as a screenshot of Mac OS X 10.5, code-named Leopard. Security vendors including McAfee and Symantec have labeled the file a "low-level threat" and experts have largely characterized it as an example of potential risks Mac OS X users face.

In a statement, Apple disputed that Leap.A was a virus, calling it "malicious software that requires a user to download the application and execute the resulting file."

"Apple always advises Macintosh users to only accept files from vendors and Web sites that they know and trust. We have a guide to safely handling files received from the Internet," the company said.

Still, virus or not, Leap.A has sparked discussion about whether Apple's UNIX based operating system will prove as vulnerable as Windows. Security has become a top focus of Microsoft over the past two years, and Windows Vista is slated to bring a number of enhancements to protect users. Mac users have largely been spared of such troubles, but that could change, analysts say.

"I've seen blogs and news sites suggesting that the so-called iPod effect is increasing Mac sales, putting more Macs in use and making Apple's operating system a bigger target. I don't believe it," commented Jupiter Research senior analyst Joe Wilcox. "There are 42 million-plus sold. Anyone see a viable, mass iPod virus?"

However, Wilcox notes that Apple's move to the Intel platform could also bring the first big security problems. "The volume of hackers sure does appear to be greatest on computers running Intel or AMD processors. Now, alongside Windows and Linux, those hackers can run Mac OS X."

Adds Wilcox: "My concern: Of the nearly two dozen people I know with Macs at home, I'm the only one using antivirus software. When trouble comes, many Mac users won't be prepared."

Add a Comment (61 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By gillesis@shaw.ca

edited Apr 3, 2008 - 11:37 PM

I have been waiting for months for the Anti-virus AVG to be available to Apple IMAC users but to no avail????? I used it with my PC last year & found it most useful.Would love to have it gain but cannot find it anywhere..please help, thanks, Gilles.
PS..if AVG is not available can you recommend a free Anti-virus site I can download for my IMAC ?

Score: 0

By valensstore

edited Mar 2, 2007 - 1:04 PM

VALEN STORE.
We are mobile phones wholesalers.We deals on all brands and models of mobile phones such as Nokia,Motorola,Samsung,Sony Ericsson,Sagem, Nextel,Sidekick II,Sprint,Ipods,television,W/xbox 360,dvd, Laptops, Mp3 players and many more at very cheap prices.We are using this medium to look for buyers of mobile phones.Do kindly reply back if you are interested, you can reach us through our email address: valenstore@yahoo.com.
Our phone is brand new and it comes with complete
accessories and t2 euro specs with 12 months international warranty
ACCESSORIES
1) Brand new gsm phones (this includes accessories, Manuals, software
and boxes)
2) Unlocked / sim free
3) Brand oem (original manufacturer) box - no copies
4) All phones have English language as default
5) All material (software, manual) - Car chargers - Home chargers - USB
data cables - holsters/belt clips - Wireless headsets (Bluetooth) -
Leather and non-leather carrying cases - Batteries
- MOQ (Minimum order quantity) is 1 units
- Sample order available at MOQ, we do not retail.
- Maximum order for first time buyer 10 units.
- Free shipping available for order more than 5 units.
- Payment for initial order or sample should be done in advance.
- All units are Brand New on sealed box, UNLOCKED, sim free, and ready to
use anywhere in the world.

PRICELIST FOR NOKIA PHONES IN STOCK :
Nokia 6125 Bluetooth Quadband Unlocked GSM Phone....$190
Nokia 6136 Bluetooth Quadband Unlocked GSM Phone....$200
Nokia 6265i Unlocked GSM Cell Phone.....$180
Nokia 6282 Unlocked GSM Smartphone......$220
Nokia 8800 GSM Unlocked GSM 900/1800/1900 World Phone.....$190
Nokia 770 Internet Tablet Support.....$210
Nokia 8801 GSM Unlocked GSM 850/1800/1900.....$200
Nokia E50 QuadBand Unlocked GSM Phone......$190
Nokia E70 Unlocked GSM Smartphone.....$175
Nokia N70 Unlocked GSM Smartphone.....$165
Nokia N71 Unlocked GSM Smartphone.....$175
Nokia N72 Unlocked GSM Phone Black....$170
Nokia N80 Quadband Unlocked GSM Smartphone Black.....$200
Nokia N90 Unlocked Quadband GSM Smartphone w/128MB card....$200
Nokia N91 GSM Unlocked Phone.....$210
Nokia N92 Unlocked GSM Smartphone....$230
Nokia N93 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$300
Nokia N95 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$350
Nokia N97 Unlocked GSM Phone......$650

PRICELIST FOR IMATE PHONES IN STOCK :
I-Mate JAM 128MB Unlocked GSM Phone....$210
I-Mate JAM GSM/GPRS Pocket PC Unlocked Phone....$190
I-Mate JAMin GSM/GPRS Pocket PC Unlocked Quadband Phone....$220
I-Mate JASJAR Quadband GSM Unlocked PDA Smartphone.....$350
I-Mate K-Jam Quad Band Unlocked GSM Smartphone.....$240
I-Mate Smartflip Unlocked Quadband Smartphone.....$250
I-Mate SP5 Unlocked GSM Smartphone.....$160
I-Mate SP5m Unlocked GSM Smartphone....$140

PRICELIST FOR MOTOROLA PHONES IN STOCK :
Motorola A1200 Unlocked Quadband Phone Black.....$190
Motorola A910 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$150
Motorola E1070 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$160
Motorola L2 Candybar RAZR Unlocked GSM Phone....$130
Motorola Q for Verizon......$200
Motorola Q Unlocked GSM Phone.....$250
Motorola Rokr E2 Unlocked GSM Triband Phone w/iTunes....$210
Motorola V1050 Quad Band Unlocked GSM Phone.....$175
Motorola V195 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$165
Motorola V3 (Gold) Edition Unlocked GSM Phone....$150
Motorola V3c RAZR for Verizon.....$145
Motorola V3i Dolce & Gabbana Unlocked Quadband GSM Phone.....$185
MOTOROLA V3x (PINK) Unlocked GSM Phone w/128 MB Card.....$170
Motorola W220 GSM Unlocked Cell Phone.....$200

PRICELIST FOR SAMSUNG PHONES :
Samsung P920 Unlocked GSM Cell Phone......$300
Samsung I830 Smartphone Unlocked GSM Cell Phone....$250
Samsung Serene SGH-E910 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$500
Samsung S401i Unlocked Triband GSM Cell Phone....$200
Samsung D870 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$230
Samsung Z710 Unlocked GSM Mobile Cell Phone....$270
Samsung p900 unlocked GSM Cell phone......$285
Samsung p860 unlocked GSM Cell phone......$255

PRICELIST FOR SONY ERICSSON PHONES :
Sony Ericsson K310 Unlocked GSM Phone....$145
Sony Ericsson K510 Unlocked GSM PhonE....$165
Sony Ericsson K610 Unlocked GSM Phone....$165
Sony Ericsson K790 Unlocked GSM Phone....$200
Sony Ericsson K800 Unlocked GSM Phone....$190
Sony Ericsson M600 Unlocked GSM Phone....$175
Sony Ericsson P990i GSM Unlocked.........$400
Sony Ericsson W700i Unlocked GSM Phone...$150
Sony Ericsson W810 MP3 Quadband GSM Unlocked Phone....$155
Sony Ericsson W850 GSM Unlocked Cell Phone.....$250
Sony Ericsson W900i Unlocked GSM Phone.....$230
Sony Ericsson W950 Unlocked GSM Phone.....$240
Sony Ericsson Z710 Quadband GSM Unlocked Cell Phone.....$250
Sony Ericsson p910i unlocked GSM phone.....$185
PRICELIST FOR QTEK PHONES :
Qtek 8100 Tri-Band Camera Music Unlocked GSM Phone White.....$125
QTEK 8300 GSM MOBILE SMARTPHONE.....$145
Qtek 8310 Unlocked Quadband GSM Phone....$165
Qtek 8500 Unlocked SmartPhone.....$155
Qtek 8600 Unlocked GSM SmartPhone....$225
Qtek 9000 3G Pocket PC Unlocked GSM Phone.....$320
Qtek 9100 Smartphone / Pocket PC Unlocked GSM Phone....$190
Qtek 9600 Unlocked GSM SmartPhone.....$280
Qtek G100 GPS PPC and Pharos Ostia GPS Software(US Maps)....$175
QTEK S200 GSM/GPRS Pocket PC Unlocked Quadband Phone.....$185

TELEVISION SET IN STOCK

Sony Grand WEGA KDFE42A10 42 in LCD Rear-Projection TV ........... $400
Sony Grand WEGA SXRD KDS-R60XBR1 60 in Rear-Projection LCoS TV.....$600
Sony Grand WEGA SXRD KDS-R50XBR1 50 in Rear-Projection LCoS TV ... $450
Sony Wega KDF-E50A10 50 in LCD Rear-Projection TV............. $450
Sharp Aquos LC-32DA5U 32 in Flat Panel LCD TV ............ $350
Sony Wega KDL-V40XBR1 40 in Flat Panel LCD TV ........... $400
Sony Wega KD-36FS130 36 in Flat Screen TV ............... $400
Samsung HL-R5067W 50 in Rear-Projection DLP TV ......... $450
Panasonic TH-50PHD8UK 50 in Flat Panel Plasma TV.............. $500
Samsung HL-R5667W 56 in Rear-Projection DLP TV .............$500
Samsung HL-R4266W 42 in Rear-Projection DLP TV ............ $450
Samsung LN-R408D 40 in Flat Panel LCD TV ............. $400
Samsung HP-R4252 42 in Flat Panel Plasma TV .............. $450
Magnavox 15MF605T 15 in Flat Panel LCD TV ............... $300
Panasonic TH-42PWD8UK 42 in Flat Panel Plasma TV ............ $350
Sony BRAVIA XBR KDL-V32XBR1 32 in Flat Panel LCD TV ...... $350
Sony Grand WEGA KDF-E55A20 55 in LCD Rear-Projection TV ......... $500
Sharp Aquos LC-37D7U 37 in Flat Panel LCD TV .......... $450
Pioneer PureVision PDP-5060HD 50 in Flat Panel Plasma TV ....... $500
Samsung LN-R268W 26 in Flat Panel LCD TV ................ $300
Sony BRAVIA XBR KDL-V32XBR1 32 in Flat Panel LCD TV ......... $350
Sony Grand WEGA KDF-E55A20 55 in LCD Rear-Projection TV .......... $550
Sharp Aquos LC-37D7U 37 in Flat Panel LCD TV ........... $400
Samsung LN-R268W 26 in Flat Panel LCD TV ........ $350
Sony Grand WEGA KDF-E60A20 60 in Rear-Projection LCD TV ...... $600
Samsung HL-R4667W 46 in Rear-Projection DLP TV........ $400
Sony Wega KLV-S32A10 32 in Flat Panel LCD TV ......... $300
Sony BRAVIA KLV-S26A10 26 in Flat Panel LCD TV ........... $300
Sharp Aquos LC-26DA5U 26 in' LCD TV............ $300
Panasonic TH-42PHD8UK 42 in Flat Panel Plasma TV......... $400
Samsung HLR5078W 50 in Rear-Projection DLP TV ............ $500
Sharp Aquos LC-45GD7U 45 in Flat Panel LCD TV .............. $450
Sharp Aquos LC-20S4U 20 in Flat Panel LCD TV ............... $250
Panasonic Onyx TH50PX500U 50 in Flat Panel Plasma TV ........ $500
Sharp Aquos LC45GD4U 45 in Flat Panel LCD TV ............... $350
Samsung SlimFit TX-R3079WH 30 in Flat CRT TV ........... $350
Samsung HL-R5688W 56 in Rear-Projection DLP TV ........... $550
Sharp Aquos LC-45GX6U 45 in Flat Panel LCD TV ........... $500

GAMES IN STOCK
GAMES LIKE.:
LEXAR 2568 MB USB DRIVE AND MP3 PLAYER -- US$35
iRiver H10red6gb H10 6gb Mp3 Player- Red -- US$100
iRiver IFP-790T MP3 Player -- US$39
Rio Cali 256MB 90260473 Cali MP3 Player (256 MB) --
$50
RCA RD2850 Lyra 20GB Audio Jukebox MP3 Player --
US$120
Samsung 5GB Micro HDD Jukebox MP3 Player with Color
Display -- US$90
iRiver H10 20GB MP3 Player - Red -- US$200 –
Rio Rio-CARBON6P 6GB MP3 Player with Voice Recorder --
US$139
Kinyo AMF-188 128MB 6-In-1 MP3 Player -- US$110
Rio Chiba Urban 256mb MP3 Player -- US $105
X BOX 360 PRICE LIST
Xbox 360 Core System -- US$200usd –
Xbox 360 Platinum SystemUS$190usd
Xbox 360 Platinum Bundle Console -- US$230usd.00
Intec G8600 Xbox 360 9.2 TFT Screen -- US$93.

The best awards and adV specialties supplier on the
Net auctioning-ELECTRONICS and MOBILEPHONES
Regards
General Manager
MrS VICTORIA BOND
E_MAIL:VALENSTORE@YAHOO.COM

Score: 0

By johnadeoye

posted Apr 25, 2006 - 11:59 AM

VIVA PHONE STORE INTERNATIONAL
21/NEW ROAD
PHONE PLAZ
LAG
NG
WE SELL ALL KIND OF MOBILE PHONES AND GAMES IN AN
ACCOMODATIVE PRICE.
play station 1......... $120
play station 2 ....$130
play station 3.....$150
xbox 360.......$200
this games are brand new sealed in black company Box.
EMAIL:vivaphonestore21@mail.austria.com
.........................................................
.........................................................
...
NEXTEL I930 FOR JUST $120, NEXTEL I860 FOR JUST $105,
NOKIA 9500 FOR JUST $160, SAMSUNG D 500 FOR JUST $170,
MOTOROLA RAZOR V3 $120, NOKIA 8800 FOR JUST $175,
SIDEKICK 2 FOR JUST $130, MPX300 FOR JUST.....$185,
P800 FOR JUST...... $160,
TREO 650......$160

NEXTEL I930 FOR JUST $120
MOTOROLA RAZR V3I AT.......$175
MOTOROLA A1000 FOR ........$180
MTOROLA MPX 300 AT JUST ....$120USD
MOTOROLA MPX 200 ....$125USD
20GB iPod 20GB iPod .........................45USD

Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Pink M9435LL/A ......40 USD
Apple 40 GB iPod photo....................40 USD
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Silver M9160LL/A ....40 USD
Apple 60 GB iPod Photo M9830LL/A..........60 USD
Apple 60 GB iPod photo ...................55 USD
Apple 30 GB iPod Photo M9829LL/A..........50 USD
Apple 512 MB iPod Shuffle MP3 Player......40 USD
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Blue M9436LL/A.......45 USD
Apple 2 GB iPod Nano......................50 USD
Apple 4 GB iPod Nano......................60 USD
Apple 30 GB iPod Vidoe...................110 USD
Apple 60 GB iPod Vidoe...................150 USD

NOKIA 9300 AT.....$150
NOKIA N90 AT ...$180
NOKIA N91 AT.....$190
NOKIA N70 AT......130
NOKIA N71 AT......$150
NOKIA N80 AT......$170
NOKIA N92 AT......$230
NOKIA 8850 SPECIAL EDITION-- US$140
NOKIA 8850 GOLD EDITION-- US$135
NOKIA 9210 AT ......$165
SONY ERICSSON P910 AT....US$145
Sony Ericsson K500i AT....., $100
Sony Ericsson S700i AT.. $145
SONY ERICSSON P900 AT .....US$140
Sony Ericsson: Z1010AT..... $155

for more enquiries contact
Phone No.+2348025913847
EMAIL:vivaphonestore21@mail.austria.com
THANKS.

Score: 0

By Das mod

posted Feb 21, 2006 - 1:22 PM

"Apple Says No"

apple can say NO as many times as they might please,but the threats are still there

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 10:35 AM

First Apple IM virus? (Apple IM...AIM?)

"lOL! oMG iTs nOt a vIrus."

Score: 0

By PostIT

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 10:42 PM

One bad apple doesn't make the entire tree bad. Get rid of it and move on.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 11:09 PM

No, but a tree of apples can be a tasty target for an infestation of worms... Look at the bigger picture... Establish a protection for the tree, not just eliminate one threat.

Score: 0

By landfish

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 11:37 PM

Poor worms, we saw in the movie Super Size Me what a diet of macs can do to you :-)

Score: 0

By doctorsmith

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 10:33 PM

When a proper malicoius virus , trojan or whatever hits the mac world, and it will, there will be many casualties, and in the front line will be all those who are convinced that this is an impossibility, for it is always those who are convinced of their own invulnerability that make the easiest targets. There was a report in Australia a couple of weeks ago of the latest victims of the Nigerian bank account scam, amongst the victims were several lawyers and wait for it a financial adviser.

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 1:49 PM

It is the way us Amerians thought before 911. It was our own arrogance, not Bush.

Score: 0

By Adrian79

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 5:15 PM

mac viruses been around for years.. there just not as severe....but who knows what will happen now ?

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 7:33 PM

LIAR!!!!!! THERE ARE NO SUCH THING AS MAC VIRUSES!!!! HOW DARE YOU BLASPHEME AGAINST THE ALMIGHTY APPLE!

No seriously, what's up with the slander against Apple? What'd they ever do to you besides try to sell you a "computer" with a quality OS? *grin*

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 8:35 PM

OSX 10.4 is immune so far, but other Mac OS's are far from it.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 11:19 PM

Are you suggesting that 10.3 and earlier are affected as well as 10.4.5, but not 10.4? Just curious so I know what users to capitalize on if and when problems occur.

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 12:56 AM

Macs have odd versioning. 10.4 is a major update from 10.3, but how big is 10.4.5 from 10.4.4?

I suppose 10.4.4 would have vulnerabilities, and 10.4.5 would not have known ones, which would be classified similar to hotfixes in XP. Every once and a while a major update comes along like Sp2/3, or OSX 10.4/10.5

You're really picky about wording. Focus more on article related facts than comment wording.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 9:30 AM

I focus on everything... it's called, paying attention. :)

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 2:56 PM

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 6:38 PM

LOL @ reading between the lines :P Hope your weekend is going well Kramy.

Score: 0

By ecokade

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 4:53 PM

I just love how the e-media has jumped all over this like it's an actual story. Have there been any actual e-casualties due to these two "viruses"? Not in an story I've seen. If there were a theoretical virus for Windows, which had not affected anyone and probably never would, do ya think it would receive this media blitz? No.
This is a classic case of pro-Microsoft monopoly-mongers using their power to spread their anti-Mac prejudice unchecked.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 7:39 PM

Umm, hey guys, help me out here... what was the name of that big scary hypothetical virus from earlier this month that did next to no damage but still managed to scare the bejeebers out of everyone in the tech industry? Wasn't it MyBall&Chain or something like that?

Let's see, what else was a much bigger deal according to the media than most viruses... oh yeah, the WMF exploit... yeah, that caused "some" damage, but was pretty limited scope and over-hyped.

Let's see... I'm sure if I start digging through news archives I could find more... and I can point out the paranoia surrounding 98% of the Windows "flaws", but you get my point by now, I hope. EVERY *POTENTIAL* security risk gets treated with concern on Windows and even the open-source platforms acknowledge security risks, solve them, and move on.

The ultimate point here is that only Apple can get away with downplaying every issue as if it's only possible to be a problem **IF** users are, in effect, stupid. That's right, you heard me... it's not an issue at all because according to them, it requires user interaction, and no Mac user would EVER be stupid and just accept files or click links from people they don't trust.

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 1:56 PM

""Apple always advises Macintosh users to only accept files from vendors and Web sites that they know and trust. We have a guide to safely handling files received from the Internet," the company said."

I think that this quote from the article is particularly interesting in that they have to have guides for their users. "Our users are safe because..."

It just made me laugh. Well, on to my work.

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 8:36 PM

And input their admin password and then install the image file to a location on their harddrive.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 11:17 PM

Well if the user was "stupid enough" to click the link, do you reckon they're smart enough to not enter their password?

I mean, seriously... Maybe you haven't worked with non-technical end-users lately, or maybe you have and just ignore the reality of the experience, but most users tend to do what it takes to get the results they want. If they want to see pictures, then they are going to view pictures, and to hell with the consequences.

And before you comment on the intelligence of Mac users, remember that Apple is the one that called them stupid first... afterall, they're the ones saying this isn't a problem at all unless a user takes action... so anyone that ends up affected by the problem is obviously an not competent or responsible enough to protect themselves.

Score: 0

By Kramy

edited Feb 18, 2006 - 1:08 AM

Apple claims there is little to no risk. From my experience with mac users, I would agree.

When you click a link to BlahBlah.jpg and it is instead an exe/equivalent, that's a clue that is quite easy to recognize.

One of the nice things about Macs is that they don't string you out to dry. Macs are designed to teach those that use them and be easy to learn for non-computer users.

Windows XP strings you out to dry unless you properly configure it, and things like defaulting to the admin account mean users think they are safe when anything and everything is running in the background.

Deny it all you want, but Macs are designed to make the fools safer. Out of the ones I've met none would input their password, though all would download the file. Remember, passwords are sensitive things, and everyone has heard "BANKING PASSWORD SCAM!!! WARNING!!!" headlines on the news.

What I find interesting though is that Macs seem to teach more relevent information. I've met oh so many PC users that don't know what a web browser is, and instead know about different file formats. I've also met oh so many Mac users that know what a web browser is(and what OSX's is called), but not what a file format is. Actually, that pissed many of them off when they tried to transfer stuff to their PC...but at least I can have a semi-intelligent conversation with them discussing different programs.

Oh well, what's it matter? OSX was made to keep less technologically inclined people safe, and it does what it does well by making sure they learn the basics.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 9:41 AM

Kramy,

Just stop dude... you've taken a series of joking comments and turned it into a crusade, lol. Moreover, you're acting like a child who just found out Santa doesn't really exist... "OMG! NO! Apple would never lie to me!"

But since you bring it up, you seem to forget that Apple doesn't have filename "extensions" the way Windows does. Therefore, it is theoretically easier to do the whole "claim it's one format, but it's really another".

That's why it's easier for Mac customers to focus on programs, not formats. It's reasonably a good thing, yes, but on the PC it's the reverse focus-- it's the files and functions that matter... not the programs.

It's a false sense of security that Apple offers, and they've been fortunate in the past because no one gives a crap about them. You overlook the fact that it takes Apple a long time to admit there's a problem though, and just as long to fix problems... but fix they do, which is evident by the number of security updates they released last year.

You can make all the claims you want about which OS is better, but the simple truth is that it boils down to user preference and comfort. If you like it great, but don't be a dimwit and think you've got something better than everyone else just because you and 5% of the computer market say so.

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 2:56 PM

I never said I liked it. Buying a Mac would be the last thing I do. All the "features" they have really interfere with productivity imo, but if you can't use a PC very efficiently in the first place then perhaps a Mac would be better.

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 1:58 PM

? so only inefficient users should buy a Mac?

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 3:56 PM

Nobody considers themselves inefficient. Only people that are actually bugged by having to keep lots of programs up to date would switch to a Mac from fear of viruses or spyware.

If you're truely an efficient computer user, then you'll be able to try a Mac and get extremely annoyed by all the features that slow things down, yet still impress anyone watching with your amazing speed.

If you aren't annoyed, then great! If you are annoyed, you won't buy a Mac.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 4:16 PM

"Once Leap.A is activated, when any iChat user changes his or her status, the worm initiates a file transfer for the latestpics.tgz archive. The file transfer takes place in the background and is hidden from the user.

In addition, the malware replaces all applications that have been used in the last month with itself, saving the original executable as a resource fork with the same filename. According to F-Secure, "When the application is opened the worm activates first, then it runs the original application from the resource fork.""

>>> No, it can't possibly be a virus! It's malware... either way, it's a vulnerability... a flaw, if you will... in Mac OS X. So while it's true that I wouldn't encourage Mac users to run out and buy the latest copy of Norton or McAfee... I would recommend that they go and download Ad-Aware or dare I say it, Windows Defender. :)

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 6:00 PM

Once [insert virus name here] is activated your Antivirus is fubar'd on windows and you need to reformat.

The betanews article isn't telling all the facts...

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 7:47 PM

I think Nate did an excellent job on this article, actually... the relevant information is present, and he did a good job of leaving it open to the reader to decide if it's really a virus or "system damaging, but user-incompetence-required malware". He uses respectable sources, too.

As for the Windows virus comment, that's not at all accurate for a [insert virus name here] comment. If you wanted to be specific, SOME viruses do circumvent SOME SCANNING ENGINES, and some of them prevent quick easy detection or removal... but I've yet to see one require a full Windows format. That's why you keep Windows AND your Antivirus software up to date at all times, and that means running updates manually from time to time, not just the auto-install features. It's also why it's a good idea to update to the latest version rather than just renew the 2002, 2003, 2004 versions that you bought years ago. (Had a girl come into the office today with Norton 2003 complaining that we removed it in favor of our managed corporate edition-- said she paid for 2003, and we pointed out "yeah, 3 years ago... viruses know how to ignore that version now.")

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 8:41 PM

Many viruses can get by Norton(non-corporate) anyway. Recently someone tried to download nLite(a Windows ISO cleaner) and Norton thought it was bad and deleted their My Documents folder. :P

Not too sharp a person...I mean using Norton, and somehow losing all their stuff in the process.

And yes, I know I was very vague.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 11:11 PM

You know I'm just using Norton as one example... you can use AVG or Kaspersky or whatever. Good grief, don't be so limited.

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 1:10 AM

Nod32?

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 9:42 AM

Yeah, sure, you betcha! :)

Score: 0

By qwester21

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 2:40 PM

If you download something, and have no idea what it is, you are a dumba**. It is only a matter of time before these so called "hackers" find a way to make a virus for every OS that exists. It is improbable to say that a virus will never exist for Mac. This is the beginning of a problem for Mac users. Malicious software or not.

Score: 0

By aboutthismac

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 2:14 PM

PS: I'm sure it's only a matter of time before someone finds a way to write a OS X virus though. Those dang widgets in Tiger seem like a great place to start.

Score: 0

By srhall

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 12:56 PM

This vulnerability exists on EVERY OS that allows you to install and run software. It is simply a bad application. You have to physically unzip it and execute it in order for it to work.

This is very different than a virus that attacks your system without you taking any physical action. In truth, many Windows viruses are similar to this. All of the e-mails you get that have an attachment of type NAKEDGIRL.JPG.EXE are very close to this.

Still, it is not exploiting a vulnerability in the OS, just a vulnerability in the person who can't resist opening up attachments.

Score: 0

By ryusen

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 1:41 PM

It's technically a Trojan, but for non-technical people any malicious software is a "virus." Also, it does have the ability to replicate itself and "infect" other files, so it could be clasified as a virus, it is just not a "worm."

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 2:15 PM

As almost every antivirus company on earth i've read that has this "malware" listed lists it as a WORM.

Still, who cares??? The whole virus vs. bad program thing is stupid. If it does damage to files, masks itself as something it is not, changes any security settings (firewall, etc.), OR installs without your knowledge it should be considered malware. I hate that term but it is the only one that includes every bad thing out there.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 2:28 PM

"I hate that term but it is the only one that includes every bad thing out there."

Except mooses. It doesn't include mooses.

...and they can be reali nasti.

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 2:56 PM

I saw a moose mess up a truck real bad once!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 4:31 PM

A moose once bit my sister....

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 2:04 PM

I had one step on my toe once, and then he ate my little brother. He tasted so bad, the the moose threw him up immediately and ran away!

Score: 0

By Kramy

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 1:11 AM

Ouch! I hope your sister was bigger than the truck!

Score: 0

By doctorsmith

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 10:14 PM

That's terrible, can I suggest a piece of cheese and a moose trap

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 11:21 PM

I would like to apologize for the sillyness of the writers... they have been sacked.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 10:36 AM

Finally....someone gets it.

Thank you.

Score: 0

By xoineg

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 12:41 PM

If it needs your permission to be installed and the user needs to click on it. It is not a virus, a Trojan or other malicious software yes. Still far fewer problems than windows, where you can get infected just by being connected to the internet.

Score: 0

By GoodThings2Life

posted Feb 18, 2006 - 11:57 AM

Are you saying that we don't have Instant Messenger Viruses, but we instead have Instant Messenger Malware?

Because I'm pretty sure that most of the time they have to click the links or accept and run a file to get infected, and take some action... but they're still classified as viruses.

All this political correctness and specialized definitions of crapware is pathetic bull sh*t... If it compromises the security of a computer, it's a security flaw... if it replicates itself, it's a virus. Period.

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 2:06 PM

No interaction required according to the story.

"Once Leap.A is activated, when any iChat user changes his or her status, the worm initiates a file transfer for the latestpics.tgz archive. The file transfer takes place in the background and is hidden from the user."

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 1:55 PM

No argument there.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 12:04 PM

"It's not a virus"

[/arnold]

Does it spread without explicit user intervention?

"requires a user to download the application and execute the resulting file." No.

Does it replicate without explicit user intervention?

"Once Leap.A is activated, when any iChat user changes his or her status, the worm initiates a file transfer for the latestpics.tgz archive. The file transfer takes place in the background and is hidden from the user." Yes.

Does it harm the computer?

"In addition, the malware replaces all applications that have been used in the last month with itself, saving the original executable as a resource fork with the same filename." Yes.

2 out of 3 ain't bad.

I'd call it a virus.

Score: 0

By athome

posted Feb 20, 2006 - 2:09 PM

I would agree. Possibly, not a severe threat, but still none the less - a virus.

Score: 0

By ktappe

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 12:19 PM

If the user has to download it themselves, it is not a virus; it is (at best) a trojan horse. Further, the user is prompted for their administrator's password before the code can do its damage, so there is a specific warning that the picture they thought they were viewing is actually a program. Both of these are why "Leap.A" has been given a lowly "1" on the severity scale--it's not running wild and it warns the user before it does anything.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 1:54 PM

Sue me for using the BetaNews report for my information.

Does the article above mention passwords? No?

well then....

Hey, at least I read the damn thing. :P

BTW: Most viruses are "downloaded" by stupid users. That file called "SW Galaxies Account Generator.exe"... Yeah, that'd be a virus.

Besides, you'll noticed I voted that part a "no"...hence the 2 out of 3 rating. :)

Score: 0

By asdfghj

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 12:37 PM

Actually it generally doesn't prompt for an administrator password. It changes files int he "Applications" directory which is writable for people with "Admin" privileges. In fact, in most stand-alone Mac OS X installation (i.e. home users), people are running as Admin's - so no password prompt.

Score: 0

By JacenSolo

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 12:49 PM

Thats the problem with most desktop OSes is that they run as admins, giving Virus' more power.

Score: 0

By Niro

posted Feb 17, 2006 - 12:32 PM

"If the user has to download it themselves, it is not a virus; "

I generally have to download a virus myself in windows...so 80% of windows viruses aren't really viruses after all??

"Further, the user is prompted for their administrator's password before the code can do its damage"

I don't see the mention of that anywhere...nowhere does it say that it asks for the admin password...soooo, where did you pull that out of??

"it's not running wild and it warns the user before it does anything."

Most viruses are spread through user stupidity...not much difference here. And this is just a "proof of concept" type of virus anyway....

Score: 0

By aboutthismac

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 2:09 PM

RE: "I don't see mention of that [requires an administrative password] to launch"

It's not mentioned because it's a given with OS X. All application installs, including Apple's own software, require an admin password. That's why security is tighter in OS X. There WERE viruses (virii?) for Mac's Classic OS for the same reason there ARE viruses on Windows now: namely, pretty much anything you want to launch will launch with a click and do whatever it was written for (for good or evil).

The difference between a virus and malware is slim, but seems to boil down to---

a virus is like poison that someone slips into your soda and you drink it without knowing.

This Mac "virus" is a loaded gun you have to put to your own head with full awareness when it asks for your password to install itself that you are NOT holding a picture of a gun (or .jpg of one) but an actual gun and that you are the one pulling the trigger.

In other words it only effects less then intelligent people who would not question a photo file needing an administrative password, not just unfortunate people (as with a Windows virus) who turned on their PC and opened Outlook Express.

Score: 0

By sophist_dreams

edited Feb 17, 2006 - 12:45 PM

From The Mac Observer:

Quote:

Leap-A is merely an attempt to disguise an executable program as an image in effort to trick the recipient into launching the program. Launching a program in Mac OS X requires the user to enter their password, an indicator that should clue most users into the fact that it is not what it appears to be. If launched, the application requires administrator access before it can install files that attempt to send copies of itself to people that are in your iChat Buddy list.

UnQuote.

Score: 0