Google Granted Voice Search Patent

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

April 13, 2006, 1:50 PM

Google may be working towards providing a method for users to make searches on the Web simply by speaking commands, according to a recent patent filing. Although filed in February 2001, the voice search patent was approved and published on Tuesday.

According to the patent abstract, Google's system would use voice recognition technology to build keywords that are entered into the search engine. "The system then provides the weighted boolean query to a search system and provides the results of the search system to a user," the filing states.

A demo of "Google Voice Search" was available through Google Labs, the company's online testbed, although it had been removed as of Thursday. That service allowed a user to call a telephone number, state a query, and then receive the results through their Web browser.

It is not clear if the technology behind the demo is what Google was patenting. Also, Google warned about reading too much into the filing, as it said it frequently patents ideas that employees come up with. Not all inventions make it to a final product, the company notes.

However, Google executives have publicly discussed using voice recognition to enhance the service in the past, which hints that some kind of speech technology could be coming to Google in the near future.

Additionally, Kai-Fu Lee, the executive Google hired away from Microsoft last year, worked at the Redmond giant in the area of speech recognition. Competitor Yahoo is also hiring people to work on voice-related projects, resulting in a lawsuit from Nuance Communications.

Add a Comment (19 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By TroyMc

edited May 11, 2006 - 7:42 PM

Advertisers on Google, Yahoo et al, need to analyze the click-worthiness of their hosts. The IAB should put a premium on their value and demand a technical solution.

A comparison of the click throughs that result in hits on multiple pages within an advertiser's site versus the hit-and-runs of fraudulent clicks that knock at the front door and leave is necessary.

A prime example taken into account is when an average person that comes to your home page results in 2.4 clicks, but Adsense visitors produces only 1.2 clicks. The value of traffic from search engines versus other clicks, should allow advertisers to pay based on their worth so Google should be paid only 50 percent of its normal rate so that advertisers receive equal value.

If not, advertisers might as well transfer to other PPA models like pay-per-call or pay-per-lead, where again the ROI is easier to explain.

Marie Rose Arong
http://www.Jump2Top.Com

Score: 0

By spiked

posted Apr 14, 2006 - 7:05 PM

Decades ago, I first watched James T. Kirk use voice search technology.

On the other hand, he was living in the 23rd century, so I guess this wouldn't represent "prior art"...

Score: 0

By TheBigGuy

edited Apr 14, 2006 - 6:37 AM

Google Talk v2, the perfect place to put the voice recognition into and be connected to the web browser

Score: 0

By Black-Wolf

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 9:23 PM

I love Google, they are the best!!

Score: 0

By horsecharles

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 8:09 PM

ha, ha, heh, heh, let's all chant: hah, hah, he, he........
Those of you stating Google is the Devil will now be able to much more easily communicate & interACT with IT.
Please post for us what those voices in your head are telling you: if it's not too graphic & embarassing that is.....

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 4:01 PM

*Having a baby is a patent violation because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office routinely grants patents on human gene sequences found in all humans*

ITs True!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 5:08 PM

Crap, 3 counts...what's that gonna get me?

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 5:24 PM

Wow you have 3 kids? How old?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 5:57 PM

8 year old boy, and two girls, ages 5 and 2.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

edited Apr 13, 2006 - 2:39 PM

So, before it even happens--does this patent mean that no search engine other than google can ever search based on voice commands? So when computers will not even use keyboards but strictly microphones in 30 years or whatever, you cannot search the internet because only google can use microphones to give voice commands online? If so...how come Mac didn't patent the mouse? Why can't Apple sue MS for using the "GUI patent"? Sharp, why not patent 64-bit color too, so that no other vendor can support 64-bit color mode if/when it comes out? WHERE IS THE LINE DRAWN? I truly want to understand the rules, they can't be as bad as my scenarios so what are they?

I want to understand the patent system and what is and is not infringement. Please, anybody, explain this to me. What entitles Google to have a lawsuit filed against another search company in this situation?

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 3:51 PM

*A patent is a document, issued by the federal government, that grants to its owner a legally enforceable right to exclude others from making, using or selling the invention claimed in the document in the United States for a term of 17 years*

So in 30 years, since Google will be GONE by then, someone else can use it.. haha..

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 3:44 PM

*Why can't Apple sue MS for using the "GUI patent"?*

Because APPLE didn't make it either. Xerox made the GUI, so Xerox can sue both of them. So there!

*If so...how come Mac didn't patent the mouse?*

for the same reason Microsoft couldn't pattent the word "windows" its too ambiguous. You can patent the laser mouse, if you can prove YOU designed a revolutionary idea.

*WHERE IS THE LINE DRAWN?

We know its not perfect, we already agreed the patent office needs an overhaul...

google did come up with an original idea. So I think they deserve it. It doesn't mean no one else can use it, you just have to give credit to Google before you can, and get their permission.

Score: 0

By bourgeoisdude

posted Apr 14, 2006 - 4:50 PM

Cleared up some of my questions. So...can "MSN Live Search" ever implement voice commands for internet searches? Or did google just oust them for the next 17 years?

Score: 0

By Nathanm

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 10:39 PM

Apple cannot sue MS for using the "GUI patent" or whatever because Apple signed a license agreement with MS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_v._Microsoft

Score: 0

By yohimbe9

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 3:22 PM

Here's the bad part - if Google didn't file for the patent someone else could and would, and then Google could be sued. So even if someone is completely against patents, there will always be the competition that doesn't care. It really does suck.

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 5:03 PM

I really don't have any problem for company suing another company for patent infringement if and only if the company actually have a product. I only find it's a problem, when a company who just own the patents with no product, and all they do is sue for income.

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 2:23 PM

Hmm.. now they are going to record voice overs!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 2:35 PM

"We're sorry, the term you searched for is no longer in service. Please check your dictionary and try again"

*click*

Score: 0

By rijp

posted Apr 13, 2006 - 3:40 PM

You forgot the generic system message at the end..

Score: 0