Haptic game controller patent suit finally draws to a close

By Tim Conneally | Published August 27, 2008, 2:55 PM

Immersion, the corporation which owns patents for haptic technologies used in the automotive, industrial, medical, and entertainment fields, will have to pay Microsoft $20.75 million to finally end litigation that began over six years ago.

In 2002, Immersion sued both Microsoft and Sony for allegedly using its patented technology in game controllers that vibrate in response to on-screen action. Microsoft and Sony took divergent routes in dealing with the suit. Microsoft chose to settle out of court, while Sony defended its controllers.

In Microsoft's settlement terms, it sublicensed the technology for $26 million in exchange for a 15-20% cut of whatever Immersion got from the Sony suit. When Sony agreed to settle the case for $121 million, Immersion attempted to sidestep having to pay Microsoft, saying it was not obligated under its agreement with Sony.

Microsoft, naturally filed suit to get its money. Immersion then countersued, saying that Microsoft breached a 2007 confidentiality agreement.

Today, Immersion finally announced that it will settle with Microsoft, paying $20.75 million and joining the Certified Partner Program. Other conditions of the settlement were not disclosed.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

So MS really sublicensed the technology for a cool $6 mil, while Sony paid got taken to the cleaners. Good one MS and Immersion, should get better lawyers.

Score: 0

|

good one MS? I'm sure you didn't mean to take a jibe at MS...because they evidently had great lawyers. They did nothing wrong, however Immersion, merely suffered oversight. What if Immersion only paid MS 3mil? It's just how the luck of the draw happens...who you going to blame? Can't really blame anybody.

Score: 0

|

"Immersion attempted to sidestep having to pay Microsoft, saying it was not obligated under its agreement with Sony."

Were they serious!? Where did their lawyers go to school???

They actually thought(sic) they had standing by saying that subsequent agreements with a third party absolved themselves of having to honor previous agreements with yet another party?

ROFLMAO!

Score: 0

|

Immersion goofed. They must be kicking themselves.

Score: 0

|

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Google acquires Gizmo5, builds IP telephony portfolio

Google Voice today confirmed rumors that it would acquire IP telephony company Gizmo5

'A pivot from war to peace:' The AMD + Intel armistice, in their own words

An extraordinary day in technology history is recognized by two long-time rivals that mutually decided it's futile to fight anyplace else except the marketplace.

PS3, Xbox to soon get Twitter, Facebook integration

Both Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Sony's PlayStation 3 will integrate with Facebook in the near future.

The iTunes App Store at 100,000: Can we stop counting, already?

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Is a six-digit number truly reflective of a healthy applications ecosystem? Or is it another type of bloat?

Analysis: The end of business-by-litigation?

The AMD v. Intel case ended neither with a bang nor a whimper, but almost with a song. Is it catchy enough for the rest of the PC world to sing in perfect harmony?

The agreement: Intel and AMD 'wipe the slate clean'

As the Securities and Exchange Commission document shows, AMD did indeed make some compromises in favor of Intel, especially with regard to conduct.

EC still holds Intel accountable even after AMD settlement

Though the future of relations between AMD and Intel may be peaceful now, the EC believes Intel may still owe restitution for its past conduct.