Having lost its own bid, Google advocates giving analog TV space to public
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published August 18, 2008, 12:09 PM
Since the 1940s, the US' TV space has been referred to as "the public airwaves." Now, Google is using a Web site to build public support for an effort to convince the FCC that it should be allowed to use that space in the public interest.
It was one of the biggest losers in the US Federal Communications Commission's auction of 700 MHz spectrum last spring, having at one time promised to bid billions for space in the high UHF television band that ended up going to Verizon and AT&T. But now, Google is trying to stake a new position for itself in the debate over what happens to the rest of the airspace -- the so-called "white spaces," in-between the blocks of spectrum that fetched billions for the federal government -- by suggesting the FCC give it away.
"Make no mistake: Open access to this unused bandwidth would surely be good for our own bottom line (not to mention those of many of our industry peers)," reads the inaugural posting for Google's new advocacy Web site on the issue, called Free the Airwaves which just went live this morning. "Better access to the Internet means more people doing Web searches and using our software products. But we think the public interest here is paramount, and just as clear. Opening up the vast unused portion of spectrum will enable a new generation of innovation and competition from which consumers -- especially those to whom the white spaces could soon deliver high-speed online access -- should benefit tremendously, both from a wealth of new products and services and from far lower cell phone and Internet access bills."
Google's support for opening unreserved frequencies to the general public -- or to any service provider that wants to try non-impeding service there -- is nothing new, as the company made its position clear as early as last fall. In March, in an ex parte filing with the FCC (PDF available here), Google's Washington-based counsel Richard Whitt advised commissioners that the abundance of unused airspace could provide "a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to provide ubiquitous wireless broadband access to all Americans."
But Whitt went on to state that such an opportunity wasn't just in the public's interest, but in Google's as well, as freeing the white spaces would give it a platform to launch services on Android-based phones.
As Whitt wrote, "Coupled with the 'Android' open source platform for mobile consumer devices, TV white spaces can provide uniquely low-cost mobile broadband coverage for all Americans. As announced last fall, over thirty other companies are working with Google through the Open Handset Alliance to develop a fully open source software stack, including the operating system, middleware, and user applications. Android-powered handsets should begin appearing commercially later this year, and would be an excellent match for the TV white space."
Last month, the FCC conducted its latest round of field testing of prototype white space devices, after tests involving a Microsoft-built prototype in February proved a spectacular failure. The second round of tests concluded late last month, with participants such as Motorola saying they're "pleased" with the results thus far.
But the National Football League, which was invited to participate in one test during a Redskins/Bills exhibition game last week, apparently indicated that test to be a failure as well. White space device prototypes reportedly were unable to detect the transmission of wireless microphones -- for instance, the kind that referees wear on the field -- prompting Shure, the manufacturer of those microphones, to proclaim in advance that those tests will "conclusively show that spectrum sensing white space devices will cause harmful interference to wireless microphones during live events." The FCC itself yet to issue a final report.
The secret to the would-be success of so-called "white space devices" -- once they uncover just what that secret is -- is their ability to detect whether designated frequencies are in use by other, perhaps larger transmitters, and then shift their own frequencies so as not to interfere. Both sender and receiver have to know the shift is taking place, so that wireless communications devices, for instance, can change their channels. But they have to do so seamlessly, so that not only the wireless customers never know the shift happened, but also whoever else is using those frequencies -- for instance, TV broadcasters.
For their own part, TV broadcasters place no faith whatsoever in white space devices' ability to work. Last month, after the FCC announced its second round of plans, National Association of Broadcasters' Executive Vice President Dennis Wharton issued another skeptical statement: "NAB has no quarrel with field tests, but based upon multiple failures of unlicensed devices in laboratory testing thus far, we remain highly skeptical that this technology will ever work as advertised."
Meanwhile, Free the Airwaves is urging readers to sign an online petition urging the FCC to support a technology that, in its words, could "pave the way for universal wireless broadband access."
Of course they do!
If they can't control it, of course it should be made public.
White space devices are already being tested and deployed. Check out ProSound News and FOH for more details.
Score: 0
|It just pisses the public off that for decades this PUBLIC service has been for the people paid for by public taxes and suppose to be there for public use and information flow. And yet the FCC is now auctioning it all off to the private sector and the public is now going to get screwed for it in that what was once a public service Free to air television is now a pay to view system Cable or Dish. And the DTV initiative is gimmiky at best especially in rural regions where in the past you could get 3 or 4 channels (ABC NBC CBS FOX) out of the air some of which were fuzzy but at least viewable. Now has nothing at all cause the DTV broadcasts will not lock in or is blocky and you can't hear anything they say at all. Thats a lot of the country people. I'm talking a good 40% at least that are not in large metropolitan areas. Which is the only places I have yet to see DTV work at all.
Where is the emergency information services then? Where is the public trust?
I guess all that went out along with the constitution when the whole patriot act started the ball rolling all over our civil rights.
Liberty is wasted on the people of today. For they do not know what liberty actually is. They have not seen it in a generation at least. Each tiny step the government makes taking things away from the public is another step towards a controllable working class under an aristocratic ruling class. In other words Tyranny.
The FCC using this DTV initiative essentially removes the public rights to the airwaves in favor of a controlled medium that if you can not afford to use you are excluded from. And the Auctioning off of public airwaves to the private sector, is tantamount to grand larceny of billions of tax dollars paid to the government to ensure that the public airwaves remain for the public good and use for all these decades of Television and radios existence..
Score: 0
|Exactly the same is happening in the UK.
http://www.ukfree.tv/ful....php?storyid=1107051385
Score: 0
|How about we dedicate some space to local "pirate" stations? Let the public actually "use" it.
Score: 0
|