Hulu whips up its own DRM to block people from watching videos outside browsers

By Tim Conneally | Published April 2, 2009, 3:30 PM

Hulu is reportedly attempting to keep out the non-browser based watchers by implementing its own form of DRM with JavaScript, but the trick didn't work for long as media center applications have already been updated.

Because of the sudden popularity of solutions like Boxee and MCE, and the related displeasure they caused content providers, streaming television service Hulu has been cat-and-mousing with third parties in the way that typically ends in legal action.

First, Hulu amicably divorced itself from the Boxee platform at the behest of the content studios. Then Boxee discovered a simple workaround, which caused Hulu to change its RSS feed structure. Now, because it is in Hulu's interest to keep viewers in a place where they know the advertisements will be served properly (i.e. the browser), the site has been changed yet again.

To make sure the service's videos are viewed in a browser only, Hulu is now encoding the HTML character stream as it flows into the browser, and using JavaScript to decode it on the client side. The converted plaintext is then rendered as DHTML in the browser window.

While this yet again blocks Hulu from media center programs like Boxee, a service like ZeeVee's Zinc 3, which is either a Mozilla-based standalone media browser, or a Firefox plugin, is in the clear; and TunerFreeMCE, whose designer discovered this new trick in the first place, has already devised a workaround.

The whole conflict is caused by studios who wish to keep closer control over their properties in this setting. An executive from NBC Universal, one of Hulu's parent companies, spoke about this issue yesterday at Cable Show '09. Bonnie Hammer, President of Cable Entertainment and Cable Studio at NBCU said, "We don't want to put our whole lineup on the Web, but as long as you're careful, its additive. If you don't allow [consumers online access] they steal it, so you have to provide it legally."

Provide it to them legally, but don't provide them too much. Because Internet-delivered programming has the power to devalue the TV advertising dollar, content is meted out in manageable doses.

Advertisers want to be where the consumption is taking place, and when it is taking place on the Internet, there is less profit to be made. Therefore, the studios attempt to limit the consumption of media on the Internet enough to keep advertisers from abandoning their higher-value TV ads in favor of those on the internet, while also providing enough content to reach the growing online audience.

It's a delicate balance, and third parties like Boxee and MCE have been throwing a wrench in the nascent online efforts by building utilities to view content while bypassing the provider's website.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

In some part it is based on the fear of bypassing ads, but the primary goal is simply to keep off of the TV. Hulu's agreement with the studios (and its studio owners) likely dictate that it is to stick strictly to the computer medium, though obviously a fight against the reality that the line is blurring. The big money with the present day business model is in the TV distribution deals and revenues on TV, which could be severely jeopardized if viewers can more easily bypass use of the TV stations.

It's all about maintaining the current business model and therefore the money. To be fair, and as most consumers often neglect, it costs a lot of money to produce the content that we enjoy.

Score: 0

|

Maybe if we didn't have to watch the same ***tty ads over and over people would be more open to the idea of watching ads. I get sick of watching the same stupid eTrade ad with the helicopter, the AT&T ad with the techno twins in Brussels, the Coke Zero ads with the "Coca Cola stole our formula"...jesus. How long does it take to produce some new commercials?

Score: 3

|

And for the love of GOD bring back the 'holidays are coming' Coke one at Christmas.

Score: -1

|

They could invent their own browser and proprietary media encoding and it won't matter in the end. It's always going to be circumvented because it smacks everyone in the face as being inconvenient and restrictive. Intellectual Property rights matter less than convenience to consumers. Which "side" is "right" depends on which "side" you happen to be on.

Regarding quality and abundance of fresh advertising: As long as the economy falters we're not going to see an increase in spending for newer, better, more interesting/entertaining ads. Some, sure. But not a lot. That's part of what is concerning financial analysts about Google's business model right now.

Score: 0

|

boxee did not bypass ads, least not within the content...
while Hulu is a step in the right direction, they sure have alot to learn it seems

know my biggest wish though? when i see some 'popular' comedy central clip making its rounds via comedy central in the US, click it to be told 'clip available in canada on comedy network' ... well thats great, but provide me with no link to the canadian clip, i wish they would provide that link =P

copyright and its various agreements break the f*cking internet

Score: 1

|

It did on my region-free Xbox.

But I think the issue is that is also bypasses any ads or other content on the website itself. Not just the ads in the video.

Score: 0

|

probably... *drags browser to TV and goes full screen =P

Score: 0

|

Heh. JavaScript as a security measure = fail

Score: 0

|

Report: Microsoft to randomize Europe's browser screen choices

The fact that "A" is for "Apple" was apparently at the heart of browser vendor objections to Microsoft's alternative to listing IE first.

Acer eclipses Dell for #2 spot in global PC shipments, says iSuppli data

It literally does look like a 360-degree turnaround in Dell's fortunes, as the bells of bad tidings now toll solely for Dell.

Microsoft, don't hang up on Windows Mobile, but do call for help

Only a Manhattan Project can save Microsoft's phone strategy now.

See ya later, WinMo: Microsoft's mobile strategy needs a reboot

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Hands up if you're considering upgrading to a Windows phone for the holidays...Anybody?

Playing catch-up in 2010: Windows Mobile, BlackBerry, and Symbian

Microsoft, RIM, and Nokia are each working on improved mobile operating systems. But could these efforts add up to too little, too late?

Will Nokia's plans further alienate American consumers?

A look at Nokia's plans for the coming years does little to shine up the company's increasingly dull image.

Bing bonked by service outage Thursday, Microsoft configured the wrong server

It's always nice to have a backup, but it's even nicer to remember which one is the backup. That's the lesson Bing's admins learned yesterday evening.

Survey reveals there are more women then men, including on social networks

If you think you can market your products and services online as though you're selling car batteries in the middle of halftime, think again. And again.

Android team updates 'Donut' and 'Eclair' SDKs

The Android SDK includes components which optimize app development for each version of the mobile operating system. Today, the 1.6 and 2.0 components got updates.

The Black Screen Syndrome, or, Tech news in search of the apocalypse

Scott Fulton On Point: This is a story about something that should not have been a story, about something that at one time was a story.

Online advertising evolves away from display, toward interactive software

Marketing departments and agencies are increasingly establishing positions for "creative technologists" who can steer designers and developers toward platforms that enable direct connections with consumers.