IAB releases fresh guidelines for online ads ecosystem
By Angela Gunn | Published October 31, 2008, 7:38 PM
The organization representing the lion's share of online ads sales in the US is looking to streamline the process of getting those ads in front of you. Mad Men material it's not... or is it?
At its annual Ad Operations Summit in New York this week, the IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) rolled out five industry initiatives that are meant to improve efficiencies between ad sellers and the sites that present those ads -- and hey, a little sales growth stimulation wouldn't hurt either.
Growth of another kind drove the drafting of the new guidelines: Online ads sales (recession aside) have grown to the point where a system is needed to keep the ecosystem running smoothly and scaling happily -- a "War on Discrepancies," as the IAB has previously referred to their ongoing standardization efforts. To that end, the five new procedures are:
- Automation of order transfers. Currently, when an ad is ordered, often as not someone's got to manually type the info into a system somewhere, using a format that's special to wherever they work. To say the least it's a process prone to delays and errors. The new XML-based E-Business Interactive Standards will allow businesses to automate requests for proposals, the proposals themselves, and insertion orders -- standardizing what's currently a goulash of approaches.
- Digital duels derailed. More XML will be put to work in the Digital Video Ad Serving Template, which will standardize communication between servers and the video players that need to love them. Publishers will be able to turn over unsold ad inventory to networks that can try to sell it.
The other three initiatives are best-practices guides, covering workflow, load performance, and rich media ads.
Peeking into those guides gives civilians a sense of what the advertising folks are up against at work, and fans of Mad Men may smile to see that at least a few things never really change. Workflow still has to account for creative types getting their stuff done late. Advertisers still bail out on publishers unexpectedly and vice versa. And Accounts Payable can still make everybody crazy with arcane procedures for getting people paid.
So skim the new guidelines, curious Web-watcher, and ask yourself if maybe someday your grandkids will be buzzing about a show about those wild and crazy interactive-advertising folk at the turn of the century.
I consider advertising to be part of the problem (mainly due to the lies) and NOT part of the solution. Especially online advertising.
Score: 0
|So besides all the other 'free' online services you are enjoying. Who do you think pays the bills for BN?
Score: 0
|Alas, Scary Guy, for some people "that list" is what you and I would call the monthly credit-card bill :-) .
We agree completely on unnecessary spending, and sometimes I swear the problem is worst among tech folk. (Who doesn't know someone who just haaaas to have every single new product from a certain manufacturer -- no names, let's call them "iFruit" -- the moment it's released? I mean, I'm a happy enough owner of a few iFruit products, but I won't replace them 'til I wring the last ounce of functionality out.) And you will ice-skate in the Sahara before you catch me standing on line to be first to buy a new phone / computer / Xmas toy / designer outfit -- really, don't get that mentality, and that mentality *is* a thing that techies have. Why?
Score: 0
|http://www.kuwaittourism.com/ice-skating.aspx
Score: 0
|(polite silence) You, uh, would want to consult a map re that.
Score: 0
|Relax. It's a joke and close enough for that...
Score: 0
|Making life harder for those bas****s makes my life happier. I can't believe how many people buy crap that they don't need just because there is a lot of "hype" about it.
A short list
Razr
Iphone
Beanie Babies
Furby
Pokemon
Magic cards
I'm sure there is a list somewhere, go look it up.
The advertisers job is to obfuscate the distinction between "want" and "need", and make it so the client company can sell it to you for three times as much as it's worth and five times as much as it cost them to make it.
Score: 0
|