IBM to Implement Sun Solaris on x86-based System x

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published August 16, 2007, 3:04 PM

IBM and Sun Microsystems did indeed announce an agreement for deploying the Solaris operating system on IBM servers, but it wasn't the system we guessed: IBM will deploy Solaris for its Intel x86-based System x and BladeCenter servers.

It's a significant move, as it validates the presence of Sun's operating system among a broad customer base that few can mistake as a "niche." As Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz told reporters today, IBM becomes the first Tier 1 reseller of Solaris products and services for x86 platforms.

As it stands now, IBM senior vice president Bill Zeitler explained during his joint appearance with Schwartz, customers who download Solaris for their System x servers on their own, will still be entitled to the same Sun service they've always been. But within the next 90 days, support options will become available from IBM that will open IBM's existing customers to expanded avenues of support and service, from both Sun and IBM.

System x is currently available with Linux and IBM's own AIX flavor of UNIX, as well as Windows (though Zeitler cleverly avoided directly mentioning Windows today, referring to it as among "other operating system choices"). He was repeatedly asked what customers he intended for Solaris flavors of System x to target, and whether other segments of IBM's existing businesses would be impacted as a result.

"I don't see a single operating system as being the choice," Zeitler responded at one point. "I think customers make choices, markets make choices, and mature vendors react by responding to those customer requirements. And that's what we're trying to do here. We're still going to continue the investments we make in AIX; we think it's an excellent, highly scalable, highly reliable offering. But just pragmatically, there's a lot of customers who love Solaris and are loyal to it, and so I don't see this as compromising our commitment to AIX or compromising our commitment to Linux or the other operating systems we have. I think it's a reinforcement of our commitment to open interoperability and to the market."

FURTHER DETAILS FORTHCOMING

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

How will this affect HP?

Sun might sell less servers because of this but will have licensing deals for software and support contracts, so not really sure if they will be a winner or not.

Personally I believe that the only clear winner in this will be IBM who will be able to take the lead in the server market.

Score: 0

|

It seems that both IBM and Google are using Sun as a stalking horse. What long term effect this will have on Sun is anyone's guess. Who's the winner in all this? It's far more likely to negatively impact Linux than Windows.

Score: 0

|

"System x is currently available with Linux and IBM's own AIX flavor of UNIX..."

AIX does not run on System x (x86), only System p and i. For System x the choices are flavours of Linux, Windows, and VMWare ESX Server

Score: 0

|

It's a significant move, as it validates the presence of Sun's operating system among a broad customer base that few can mistake as a "niche."

Can someone translate that into english?

Score: 0

|

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

Windows desktops and notebooks reach near price-performance parity for Holiday 2009

Gone are the days when average Windows desktop offered more for less than laptops.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?

Not-so-mobile battery life: Time to force the issue

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If power efficiency is important when you buy a car or even a motorcycle, why shouldn't it matter for a smartphone?

Apple invokes DMCA, claims Psystar is 'trafficking in circumvention devices'

In trying to close the book on possibly the last attempt at a Mac clone, Apple cites from its own landmark case...but may actually be misinterpreting it.