RSSIBM to Publish its Patent Applications
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published September 27, 2006, 5:27 PM
In an effort to clarify some of the rough edges that have separated IBM's corporate policy as an open-source advocate, and its policy towards enforcing patents on its own intellectual property, the company Tuesday announced a change to its policy on applying for and enforcing patents on its intellectual property.
Most importantly, the company said it intends to reduce the number of patents it applies for in the field of business methods and will make the content of its patent applications public.
"IBM believes that widespread adoption of a more formal code of conduct around patents could ease the burden on legal and government administrative systems," said a company statement yesterday. "Those systems now deal with growing numbers of questionable patent applications and patent lawsuits."
The company said it will now publish its patent filings online, and encourage others to do the same. Patent applications are already a matter of public record, though arguably, the US Patent and Trademark Office may not always get around to publishing applications online in an immediate fashion - since it deals with thousands of applications at any one time.
Part of the recent debate over whether software should be patentable centers around the argument by open-source advocates and others that software methods are discoveries of ways to work, rather than inventions, and are thus not subject to patent. For IBM to maintain the support it has already received among the open-source community, it needed to take a stand, and not have that stand appear to be situated too close to the proverbial fence.
"Pure business methods without technical merit should not be patentable," IBM's new policy now reads. "All inventions with technical merit should be patentable, provided they meet all of the requirements of patentability. Applicants should seek to publish, not patent, their pure business method innovations if they wish to prevent others from patenting similar business methods."
To that end, IBM is apparently looking to further develop a kind of community methodology marketplace, based in part on its "Intellectual Property Marketplace Wiki" project launched last May.
In a document that emerged from that effort in June, IBM senior vice president John E. Kelly, III, stated that one of the suggestions emerging from this Wiki project was "a new media Web 2.0 tool that enables documents to be collaboratively written through a common Web site - to address the intellectual property marketplace."
Making its patents open to community review may be the latest in a series of steps by IBM to cast itself as a company responsible to its community, rather than single-mindedly looking out after its own interests. At the same time, the company is clearly taking a stand on the fact that patents remain useful tools for establishing intellectual property rights, as long as it is clear to the general public whose rights are being protected.
Of the text by divinelogic --Instead of relying on patents and trademarks to "own" intellectual properties, companies should freely publish it's [sic] ideas, innovations, and inventions to a global marketplace.-- note that IBM is posting its patent applications AFTER it has filed them with the USPTO. IBM still plans to use patents to own its intellectual property.
Separately, the consequences of telling IBM about prior art in IBM's "six month window" for comments are not clear.
There is more discussion available at IPBiz.blogspot.com.
Score: 0
|Of the text --Patent applications are already a matter of public record, though arguably, the US Patent and Trademark Office may not always get around to publishing applications online in an immediate fashion - since it deals with thousands of applications at any one time.-- the USPTO does publish applications in about 18 months and usually pretty much on time.
See also
http://ipbiz.blogspot.co...ilings-on-line-but.html
Score: 0
|Finally a company is starting to understand what the future of technology is going to be like. The patent office is way too backed up to handle every patent application, and innovations and inventions are being constructed faster today than ever before.
Something is going to have to change.
Instead of relying on patents and trademarks to "own" intellectual properties, companies should freely publish it's ideas, innovations, and inventions to a global marketplace. What would then happen is, the first company to publish the information would ultimately have "ownership" of that intellectual data.
For instance, Ternary Logic is not new, but logic based on the flow of natural light particles has yet to be explored.
I've had this idea (or rather vision) for a while, but I don't have the money nor the resources to get anything patented. Therefor, I've been publishing my ideas in the form of blogs on myspace. This way, if someone were ever to use my ideas and make a product that would use the flow of natural light, in a court of law, I have publicly made available this information, so therefor I am the owner of it.
To give you an example, (Betanews please don't delete this) here is the code.
111
112
113
121
122
123
131
132
133
211
212
213
221
222
223
231
232
233
311
312
313
321
322
323
331
332
333
This is based on natural light, so there would be a three-way gate that is either red (1), green (2) or blue (3), which incidently is the three primary frequencies of the visible light spectrum.
I could go on and on here.
The point is, we (meaning all humanity) are going to have to realize we should be combining our talents and work toward common goals, instead of competing with each other.
This goes along with the Theory of Governing Dynamics, in which John Nash stated "what's best for the group is the individual doing what's best for the individual and the group".
Microsoft beware! I'm knocking on the door!
Score: 0
|