India, Brazil next to take issue with Open XML

By Ed Oswald | Published May 30, 2008, 12:06 PM

After South Africa voiced its objections to how the Open XML standards ratification proceedings were conducted, the standards bodies of both India and Brazil are registering similar complaints.

The IEC has confirmed that it received two additional appeals from India and Brazil before the deadline. A fourth country is said to have considered filing an appeal, but the standards body has not confirmed this, and declined to say how many appeals it had received.

It should be noted that the deadline was actually last night, and not Saturday as originally reported by BetaNews: there was some confusion both among the standardization bodies and in the media over when the appeals needed to be received. Thus, some say additional appeals could arrive late: it is not clear whether or not they will be accepted, however.

"At the [ballot resolution meeting], the Brazilian delegation was not allowed to present an important proposal regarding the legacy binary mapping," reads an important paragraph from the Brazilian letter of objection, published yesterday by ConsortiumInfo.org. "This proposal was a complementary part of USA delegation proposal regarding the new organization of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500. It also shall complement the scope change proposal approved at the BRM."

Brazil's appeal was improperly addressed, as a single appeals letter was sent to both CEOs of the IEC and ISO -- copies are to be sent to each CEO -- but the groups said they would waive the requirement.

Like the South African dispute, India and Brazil are also challenging the validity of the "fast track " process. Again, officials are pointing out that there was just too much information to look over in too little time.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

I'm glad Ed Oswald is reporting this. It's a stunning indictment on ISO's process and how if they would have followed their own rules, this never would have happened. It's also instructive as a reminder that cheaters (aka Microsoft) may win the battle and lose the war, along with any future credibility with national bodies.

Score: 0

|

And let's not be so quick to forget Botswana, Togo, and Namibia...

Score: 0

|

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Google acquires Gizmo5, builds IP telephony portfolio

Google Voice today confirmed rumors that it would acquire IP telephony company Gizmo5

'A pivot from war to peace:' The AMD + Intel armistice, in their own words

An extraordinary day in technology history is recognized by two long-time rivals that mutually decided it's futile to fight anyplace else except the marketplace.

PS3, Xbox to soon get Twitter, Facebook integration

Both Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Sony's PlayStation 3 will integrate with Facebook in the near future.

The iTunes App Store at 100,000: Can we stop counting, already?

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Is a six-digit number truly reflective of a healthy applications ecosystem? Or is it another type of bloat?

Analysis: The end of business-by-litigation?

The AMD v. Intel case ended neither with a bang nor a whimper, but almost with a song. Is it catchy enough for the rest of the PC world to sing in perfect harmony?

The agreement: Intel and AMD 'wipe the slate clean'

As the Securities and Exchange Commission document shows, AMD did indeed make some compromises in favor of Intel, especially with regard to conduct.

EC still holds Intel accountable even after AMD settlement

Though the future of relations between AMD and Intel may be peaceful now, the EC believes Intel may still owe restitution for its past conduct.