Inside the MacBook Air: Can Apple justify its value proposition?

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

January 15, 2008, 5:21 PM

Apple is now in the position where it cannot hold a proper Macworld without unveiling "One More Thing." But with the iPhone being a hard act to follow, was the MacBook Air enough to keep the world's gadget haven at the top of its game?

Viewpoint ribbon (small)

It is not the iPhone -- that is, it isn't the game-changing device that forced an entire segment of the industry to rethink its approach to design, functionality, and service. The MacBook Air is an attempt to fill a gap, and with the iPhone now having reportedly sold 4 million units by Apple's numbers, that gap is smaller now than ever before.

The gap is this perceived empty space of form and functionality that manufacturers continue to believe exists between the smart phone and the small PC. With the notebook PC very rapidly, if not yet completely, becoming a commodity item in the US market with very little room for distinguishing value -- although Alienware keeps right on trying -- it's almost impossible for any manufacturer to make a compelling case for why its models deliver better value than others', beyond a competitive price point.

While the MacBook Air works to fill this gap, I can't help but be very thankful that Apple didn't try to build a UMPC or Mobile Internet Device, as some believed it might. Up until this morning, rumors were still flying that the company would produce an ultra-sub-notebook or a "handtop" that's teardrop-shaped and not much larger than an iPhone. As Samsung and Intel have already proven, there isn't much of a market for that form factor in the US. To make a truly valuable proposition at that size, a manufacturer needs a standout device, which an OQO or an Eee PC arguably is.


MacBook Air

Although from certain angles it's certainly beautiful, from a practical perspective, the MacBook Air may not be that much of a standout. It has some classic elements of Apple innovation, including a touch pad that recognizes gestures similar to what the iPhone recognizes, and a mere 3 pounds of weight. But for the type of applications that define a Macintosh as opposed to a mere iPhone, an 80 GB hard drive will not be enough. And its Remote Drive concept -- which borrows the machine's built-in 802.11n Wi-Fi link to connect with another nearby device, including a Windows PC, for borrowing its optical disc -- runs the risk of turning the Air into an $1800 peripheral.

An external optical drive is available, though as Toshiba learned to its detriment with its first ventures into the sub-notebook form factor, carting along even a lightweight two-part contraption doesn't beat the convenience of a slightly heavier one-part. To paraphrase Arlo Guthrie as I've done so often before, one big pile remains better than two little ones. Besides, that optional add-on blows away the $1800 price point.

With an extra weight of just two pounds, you can shave several hundred dollars off the price of an Air and get a classic MacBook. You may not be getting the 45 nm Intel 1.6 GHz Core 2 Duo (1.8 GHz with the solid-state drive upgrade), but you'll actually be getting a faster one anyway, plus you'll get the convenience of the optical drive built-in, and you'll get a faster hard drive. (80 GB is cutting it a bit close these days, though with the classic MacBook, you can upgrade that to 250 GB.) You also may not get the "gestures" feature, at least for now, but it's probably only a matter of months before that feature is retrofitted onto every MacBook, and perhaps even added to iMac.

[We've since learned that despite what both Steve Jobs and Intel's Paul Otellini said about shrinking the die, the CPU for the Air is actually a 65 nm product.]

It's at the classic level where Apple is already price-competitive. This afternoon, we configured the price of a comparable Sony Vaio VGN-SZ740, with a 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo, 2 GB of DRAM, a 120 GB hard drive, a DVD combo drive, the same-size 13.3-inch display, and built-in camera like the Air. Sony's Style store quoted us a price of $1,400. Bumping up the classic MacBook to 120 GB would bring its price up to par with Sony's, and still what we used to call "the Apple premium" -- that extra price tacked onto anything with an Apple logo on it -- would be missing altogether.

One of the temptations that did crop up over the last few weeks of rumors was the hope that perhaps Apple was playing with the idea of a solid-state drive. After all, it is one of the world's largest single manufacturers of flash-memory-based devices, so it could possibly buy in quantity and get a price break.

If it is getting a price break on the SSD-endowed MacBook Air option, you'd never know it. Substituting the HDD with a 64 GB solid-state drive cranks the MacBook Air price to a colossal $3,098.

So after the luster wears off, will the fact that you can slip the MacBook Air into a mailing envelope be enough to justify an extra expenditure of $300 - 400? It isn't that much of a jump -- certainly "the Apple premium," if there still is one, is lower than it ever has been in history. But there may also be a number of other elements about the MacBook Air to which the phrase "not much of a jump" may also apply, and that right now is the danger Apple faces.

Add a Comment (12 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By Personal Mac

edited Jan 24, 2008 - 10:19 AM

I dont know what all the fuss is about! If you want a cheaper machine with an optical drive, go get one, there are plenty available. People scoffed when Apple did away with the floppy drive. Is anyone still b****ing about that? The MacBook Air is meant to be an ultra portable, ultra useable, wireless machine. I think Apple have created a beautiful product which will be a reliable pleasure to use. I wouldnt waste my time and money on a computer that runs on windows. life is too short.
I am a trained windows/pc maintenance & installation technician who switched to Macs 4 years ago and never looked back. Need i say more?

Score: 0

By mbp12

edited Jan 23, 2008 - 7:06 PM

http://mbp12.com

Score: 0

By rsx508

posted Jan 16, 2008 - 3:49 PM

I have to agree with Foxfyre (below): most critics are missing the point. This isn't aimed at "everyone" but rather a narrow market which wants slimness and style, rather than substance (in terms of horsepower and servicability). Let's face it, many CEO's can't change a laptop battery without calling one of their helpdesk staff to come do it for them. This is perfect for them. Is it perfect for the kind of people that frequent this site? Probably not.

Score: 0

By skimore

edited Jan 16, 2008 - 1:57 PM

Great work Steve Jobs.. I will go out an get a loan to buy this one. Since I have almost paid off my iPhone and MacBook pro I got last year..Someday ATT will be a good cell phone company(maybe) (I hope the Air doesn't burn up like my 2 Macbook pro's did.. But with apple care they repaired them within 10 working days. It would have been nice if they replaced them. But I will always forgive Steve since he will be waiting at the gates of heaven when I show up to let me in)

Score: 0

By IceyKola

posted Jan 16, 2008 - 9:45 AM

in a perfect world i would have enough money to afford both a 17" macbook pro for a work horse for graphics, video, and music and the air just to carry around on a regular basis

Score: 0

By briguy992

posted Jan 16, 2008 - 2:48 AM

I thought this year's keynote was a dud.

Sure, cool, we have a thin laptop. It's certainly a laptop I would never get though.

iTunes stuff we knew about.

iPhone firmware was also known (well, except the price!).

So, Apple may have passed its peak I think. I would love to be proven wrong, but I must say, after selling my iPod for a Zune w/ ZunePass, it's a much better world I live in.

Score: 0

By dougau

edited Jan 17, 2008 - 12:06 AM

A MP3 player without a user replaceable battery is one thing, a notebook computer is quite another.
If you need a optical drive it seems the small profile would be offset by having to lug an external one around.
It would be perfect for those trying to impress everyone by taking it to Starbucks though.

Score: 0

By foxfyre

posted Jan 15, 2008 - 11:19 PM

You miss the point!
If you "hav(e) to lug an external one(DVD drive) around", this isn't the machine for you!

You can download your disks to a virtual CD/DVD drive and run them, and your games without a disk...IF you need this functionality! And you can do it at your desk - not on the road.

This is like saying your Porsche GT3 is inadequate if you need to tow your boat!
But only for one stupid enough not to buy the right tool for the right job!

Score: 0

By hardedge

edited Jan 15, 2008 - 7:13 PM

You're trying to dissect the Air using logic and that's not been applicable to an Apple product since the Mac 128. They're conceptual devices that are self-justifying because of their nature and their appeal to the right-brain is inescapable if that's your main tool.

Score: 0

By gatonegrosky

posted Jan 15, 2008 - 7:07 PM

it's way to expensive .. i rather buy me a pc even if i like apple products ... it will always be a setback for apple with their overpriced products, sure they are quality but at what price ?

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Jan 15, 2008 - 6:42 PM

Seriously? This smacks of PC v Mac. As FF said, who cares? The extra couple hundred dollars isn't the point. HP didn't regain #1 in PC because it out-did Dell -- it "made the computer personal again".

You guys that are overtly geeked out on hardware will never understand why Apple sells well. It's not about practical $. It's about a cool device that stands out in a crowd of Latitudes and Lenovos. It's a petite but practical 3 lb device that will be the envy of business travelers carrying 10lb brickbooks.

Jumpsuits are the most practical clothing. Do you have one on now?

Score: 0

By foxfyre

edited Jan 15, 2008 - 5:55 PM

So we are arguing ROI?

If you want that, bypass laptops completely and get a desktop! Better yet, go review the Mac Pro.

Yup, Coach bags are economical, and a Gucci shoes are a better investment than a pair of 5.11 HRT Tactical boots. Right...

The irony is there is a world full of image conscience execs and sales folk who only need to check email and give presentations who would love this product that is long on image and short on perhaps the things that a developer of Sysadmin might prefer!

The fact is that so many fail to distinguish between the targeted market and keep wanting to compare it to that which it was obviously not intended.

But then, the multitudes stand here complaining that a Birkenstock is not a suitable running shoe not a work/hiking boot.

If you want a Hummer or a pickup truck or even a high performance sports car, you are pretty stupid to stand there trying to figure out how a luxury car that is short on performance and robustness, but long on 'style' and trendiness suits your needs.

The irony is that there are far too many who live in boardrooms and Starbucks would love just a fashion statement.

Score: 0