Korean music format MT9 tries to replace MP3 - with a karaoke twist

By Tim Conneally | Published May 27, 2008, 6:05 PM

Yet another format is attempting to replace MP3 as the standard for digital music, but can MT9 really succeed where others have failed for a decade - even with its advanced features?

MT9 was developed by South Korean engineers at Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) in association with venture company Audizen, and the format has been dubbed "Music 2.0." Its creators hope to see MT9 replace MP3, but that lofty goal will likely be replaced by one more attainable: becoming the standard for karaoke.

The main difference between MT9 files and other commonly-consumed audio formats like MP3, WMA and AAC is that MT9 is essentially six channels of unmixed audio packaged within the format's own mixer. The advantage is complete flexibility in playback, enabling players to adjust -- or remove -- any channel independently.

Vocals, chorus, piano, guitar, bass and drum each have their own track contained in the MT9 audio file. Like MP3, the format has no digital rights management built in.

Unsurprisingly, the new format is being marketed as an ideal tool for karaoke fans who wish to easily remove vocal tracks from commercial recordings. The mash-up genre, though not being directly marketed as one that would benefit from the adoption of MT9, could definitely use these files.

Mash-ups, in musical terms, take two or more existent songs, and put them together to form a new hybrid song. MT9's ability to isolate any of six audio channels in each song would strip away the current need for instrumental and vocal isolation software in the creation of these new songs.

While the format currently needs its own dedicated player, both Samsung and LG have reportedly displayed interest in equipping future mobile handsets with MT9 player software. Devices these days are more than capable to handle the extra processing requirements to mix the six channels, but Audizen faces an uphill battle to gain traction in the industry.

In the early part of the decade, Universal Music Group and company Visiosonic attempted the same type of product with their "Mixable CDs." The CDs played normally in dedicated CD players, but opened a Flash-based PCDJ remix tool when inserted in a PC. The effort, while creative, was a bust.

MT9 was, however, selected as a candidate for a new digital music standard by the Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) last month, and Audizen is selling MT9 albums -- only older releases -- in Korea for around $2 each. But even with MPEG certification, Audizen will need support from those companies selling music -- most of whom already have their own formats.

Moreover, consumers largely have no interest in yet another music standard when existing formats work just fine. MP3 Surround debuted three years ago to offer a multi-channel alternative to MP3 that was backward with the original, but it has largely been ignored.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Yeah and MP3 Pro was introduced a few years back as well, unfortunately they made it impossible for any program to use unless you paid the makers a sum of money per player (on a PC, no less!).

That, obviously, had failed as well. Surprising the dumba**es thought it'd be a profitable situation for them.

Score: 0

|

"Vocals, chorus, piano, guitar, bass and drum each have their own track contained in the MT9 audio file."

Pardon my ignorance, but why exactly six channels and what if there are more music instruments?

Score: 0

|

They're more equalizer presets than actual tracks in the traditional sense.

Score: 0

|

You know... in case you just can't stand guitars or pianos or whatever. Now I can play all my music without that annoying singing, piano, guitar, bass, ... Sweet silence.

Score: 0

|

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Where did Apple's Black Friday sales go?

According to one analyst, Apple sold nearly four fewer Macs per hour on Black Friday than same day a year ago. Now why is that?

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?