Last-minute DST Patches Create Headaches for Exchange Admins

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

March 9, 2007, 11:04 AM

While Microsoft began releasing software patches that take account of the new, earlier shifts to Daylight Savings Time months ago, panic calls from admins everywhere suggest that businesses may be waiting until the last minute to install them.

As a result, an Info-Tech Research Group bulletin this morning describes, Microsoft's technical support personnel only just this week discovered that its various patches for Windows, Exchange Server, Outlook, and other tools should be installed in a precise order, otherwise they may not actually be patching networks.

According to an Info-Tech Advisor bulletin begun last Tuesday and updated since, in response to advice from Info-Tech and others, Microsoft updated its DST Knowledgebase bulletin to reflect a more proper order of installation for all the various patches the company has released. However, Info-Tech cautions, the older edition of Microsoft's instructions remain online, and is still being linked to by other documents. As a result, some of the consulting firm's business clients are reporting problems that may have been caused by separate divisions of their companies following two (or more) different sets of instructions.

As Microsoft is now suggesting, DST patches for Windows must be applied initially - first for the server, then patches for all clients. Next, revised and updated hot-fix tools should be downloaded and applied, the purpose of which will be to rebase appointments so that they don't appear one hour later than scheduled for all of next week, after the operating system patches are applied.

Microsoft suggests that admins have users apply the client-side version of this hot-fix tool themselves, as a way of "empowering clients to rebase their own appointments," invoking the phrase in a way Jack Kemp might never have associated with it before.

Only after the hot-fix tools have been deployed can the Exchange DST patch for Collaboration Data Objects be deployed. CDOs are the data that Outlook clients exchange with one another in order for workers to see each other's scheduling items, tasks, and shared contacts. With Exchange Server 2007, these CDOs are now shared in a less centralized, more "peer-to-peer" fashion - which means, even if Exchange is properly patched, the CDOs might not be updated in turn, since the 2007 version doesn't utilize the same "central repository" architecture as the 2003 version.

Recent editions of mobile communications software, including Windows Mobile 6 and recent updates for BlackBerry and Good Mobile devices, also utilize these new GDOs - which is apparently why it's even more critical that the server OS, client OS, and middleware be patched first, in that order, prior to patching CDO separately.

Earlier this week, Info-Tech's consultants, as well as its own internal IT department, faced the patch deployment issue head-on, and in so doing ended up instructing Microsoft as to the proper itinerary for patch deployment, according to a company statement this morning. Those new instructions may have led to Microsoft's issuance of a new Knowledgebase instruction set for DST, although it apparently did not lead to the removal of the old instructions - which has yet to happen.

In a statement this morning, Info-Tech research team leader Darin Stahl said, "Businesses have known that this was coming since the U.S. Government announced the change last fall. However, unlike the Year 2000 issue when everyone had years to prepare, this change was relatively rapid. Microsoft just introduced their tool for Exchange a month ago, and unfortunately it doesn't work properly...Hopefully there will be some less stressed IT managers, thanks to the information on our Web site."

Add a Comment (30 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By jomida

posted Mar 16, 2007 - 9:38 AM

Anybody else notice that all pre-DST change event log entries are now shifted by one hour?

Score: 0

By Reverb

posted Mar 12, 2007 - 10:47 AM

Corporate IT folks are the bigger fools.
I read about the DST changes in Dec 2006
and MS had the patches available then.
4 months+ notice and no one was prepared?

Score: 0

By Joe Dirt

posted Mar 10, 2007 - 3:09 PM

Microsoft is a host of fools.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 12, 2007 - 11:36 AM

Yeah, blame the gov's knee jerk reaction to the Global Warming nut-jobs on Microsoft.

Good one.

Score: 0

By tipsyboy

posted Mar 10, 2007 - 10:40 AM

Ha!
Ha!
Ha!

°______°

Score: 0

By treworld

posted Mar 10, 2007 - 7:59 AM

LOL. This article is so true. The company at my place didn't start updating the PC's and Blackberry's until this week and they just finished their last ones yesterday!

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 9:11 PM

it's not just exchange. I know as of last week, there was several Novell patches MIA. Without a few months/weeks to test, how can people reasonably push out a patch?

Let's not get into all the java programs out there that DEPEND on a version of Java that is incompatible with the new DST changes. They have to make a choice to yank the old java version, or suffer time issues.

Microsoft is to this moment pushing out patches for various products:
http://www.microsoft.com...4f39%26DisplayLang%3den

http://www.microsoft.com...p;displaylang=en&tm

etc...

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:33 PM

Darn near everyone's playing catch-up. This DST change is a gigantic PITA for everyone involved in IT.

I really hope they considered this prior to making the decision. I'd hate to think that this cluster-f*ck was caused by pure ignorance.

Score: 0

By wtz

edited Mar 9, 2007 - 4:39 PM

To assist your readers in Daylight Saving Time transition period, and as an ongoing time reference, I wanted to introduce you to a free online Web resource:WorldTimeZone.com

WorldTimeZone.com constantly monitors and tracks time
changes by country and integrates the information on a regular basis.

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 2:54 PM

I'd like to thank Congress for wasting much more than an hour of everyone's time. Jerks. Ya, you're doing lots to ween us off foreign oil by jacking the clocks. Nice.

Score: 0

By krazy1

edited Mar 9, 2007 - 1:56 PM

Boy I am glad our Domino server updates were easier then this sounds like it was... We had 40 servers patched in less then a day,

Score: 0

By deanerk

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 1:42 PM

The best part of all of this - if Congress decides the change wasn't worth it we get to go through this whole game again next year to change back...

I agree that changing a few light bulbs and getting a digital thermostat would likely do far more to save energy. Ride your bike to work if you can. It saves energy and clears the mind, making us stressed IT guys less likely to go postal.

Score: 0

By NULLedge

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 2:15 PM

riding a bike to work sounds like a perfectly good way to get a stripe of road spatter on all your nice clothes. of course most IT people dress like hobos anyway, so, sure... ride on!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 2:23 PM

...
Or you could always dress for the ride and have the work cloths in the backpack. Ya know, some IT folks have a brain.

Score: 0

By jbaltz69

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 12:58 PM

I thought it was pretty neat. All patched up now and good to go :)

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 1:18 PM

"pretty neat?" 18 revisions on that one article alone. Unelss you didn't patch, and waited until the last minute, you screwed up!

Score: 0

By jbaltz69

edited Mar 9, 2007 - 2:51 PM

It's called Sarcasm.

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 3:09 PM

See when you said "all patched up and good to go," the use of sarcasm was fairly thin.

Score: 0

By dhjdhj

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 12:03 PM

yum update tzdata

[grin]

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 12:24 PM

Heh. Talk about cutting it close if it hasn't been run by now...

Score: 0

By dhjdhj

posted Mar 10, 2007 - 10:39 AM

Run a long time ago - just reminding people how easy it CAN be
[grin]

Score: 0

By Program86

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:33 AM

Microsoft reeks of bad planning, and this is just another example.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:59 AM

Here come the MS trolls...

Score: 0

By Polychronopolis

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:21 AM

Horray for last minute survival guides.

I am one of the cursed few who won't be sleeping on the night of the time change. My condolences go out to other 24-hour operations who will share my pain.

See you on the flip-side.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:27 AM

It's not going to be fun no matter how much work we've done to prepare.

Ya gotta wonder if they even considered the support/admin costs of this change before they went ahead with it.

Score: 0

By Silentmaster101

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:30 AM

what idiot thought of changing it anyway? i want to ring his neck.... or the collective groups neck, one by one of course.

Score: 0

By sammyc56

edited Mar 9, 2007 - 11:37 AM

It caused me a lot of grief too, but I am still glad of the change. The energy savings will overcome any IT spending... Anyways, IT spending is a good thing, right :)

Score: 0

By ghammer

posted Mar 12, 2007 - 2:01 PM

Uh, yeah. Americans have more daylight to go to the park, beach, etc.
How do they get there? By car.
If they stay home they are inside watching TV, playing games, surfing the 'Net. No savings there.

I'd predict an increase in energy use.

Score: 0

By mjm01010101

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 12:27 PM

"The energy savings will overcome any IT spending... "

Right. I wonder how much energy has been put forth installing this patch? Or what will result from it? Or in October preparing for it again?

Why didn't congress push it out several years, to 2010 at the earliest? By then many more machines would be prepared. So many networks have W2K still, and why should they change that?

What a waste.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Mar 9, 2007 - 11:58 AM

If you work in IT and aren't responsible for the budget, sure.

As for energy savings, at a 24-hour facility, I think they're pretty much non-existent. Sure, this might make it so Joe doesn't have to turn the lights on in the morning, or quite as early in the evening, but some decent lightbulbs and a digital thermostat would still be much more effective.

Score: 0