Microsoft Signs Ad Deal with Digg

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

July 25, 2007, 3:29 PM

Following a deal last August in which Microsoft agreed to handle all ad sales for popular social networking site Facebook, the Redmond company has signed a similar agreement with social news site Digg. Microsoft is working hard to establish itself in the ad industry, but faces stiff competition from Google.

Few details are known at this point, although Digg creator Kevin Rose says it's "similar to the one Facebook signed with Microsoft last year." This means that Digg will turn over control the site's advertising exclusively to Microsoft and its adCenter platform.

adCenter works much like Google's AdWords program: advertisers bid on keywords, and the service targets ads to related pages. Unlike with traditional graphical banners, advertisers only pay when they receive a click, although Google is now serving some impression-based ad campaigns in addition to text links.

Microsoft likely offered Digg a minimum revenue guarantee as it had reportedly done for Facebook. This means the company will be losing money in the near-term, but such deals are crucial if Microsoft wants to establish itself in the marketplace. It needs high-profile sites and big visitor numbers to attract ad dollars away from Google, Yahoo and AOL.

According to Microsoft, the deal will last for three years.

"This move gives us an advertising partner with a larger organization and a more scalable technology platform to keep pace with Digg’s growth. Best of all, it lets the Digg team completely focus on new feature development," explained Rose.

Google last August signed a major deal of its own in the social networking space, paying at least $900 million in shared revenue to become the exclusive search provider for MySpace.com and other Fox Web sites. Google also became the exclusive text-based ad provider on Fox Web sites.

Add a Comment (1 Comment)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By AntiochMedia

posted Jul 26, 2007 - 11:11 AM

Fantastic! Sites make more money by licensing exclusive advertising rights to advertising agencies than from the ads themselves!!!!

I don't claim to understand the Internet marketing world. I understand how it functions as far as using the services of Google, Yahoo and MSN -- I've set up search engine campaigns etc. But what I don't understand is how ROI justifies the majority of online advertising and what the actual profits of a site like - say - BetaNews - is on their ads? Are their Google Ads profitable, or are their large sponsored banners profitable? Are they paid for impressions? Clicks? Or just for running the ad for a specified time?

If anyone on here knows any good resources on this, I'd be curious to take a look. It's my unlearned opinion and cynicism towards the way that advertising is on the web that makes me feel that there's a bubble that is going to pop - like the dotCom crash.

There's a huge amount of $ in online advertising - but is the Return on Investment justifying it?

Score: 0