Microsoft makes colossal bid for Yahoo in wake of chairman's departure

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

February 1, 2008, 9:04 AM

Confirming that his company had indeed been in discussions with Yahoo's senior management about a possible takeover throughout the last 18 months, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer revealed this morning he has personally placed an offer to Yahoo's board of directors, proposing a takeover whose value it estimates at $44.6 billion.

"We've been engaged in conversations with Yahoo management off and on for the last 18 months," Ballmer told reporters early this morning. He confirmed that he had a personal conversation with Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang yesterday, to discuss his formal offer to the board.

"Our companies really do share a vision for services and online advertising," he added. The offer appears to express an interest in keeping as many of Yahoo's engineers and technical staff as possible, though it is not as clear which parts, if any, of Yahoo's technical infrastructure and advertising platform would survive. Microsoft executives this morning appear to be focusing on Yahoo's market share position, employee base, and capital evaluation rather than its technology.

Platform division president Kevin Johnson made it clear later that the Yahoo brand would survive, but to what degree it survives is not yet stated. To that, Ballmer added that the Windows Live brand would survive anyway, since it is important to him that Windows embrace the online experience.

Ballmer's move comes in the wake of Yahoo chairman and former CEO Terry Semel having announced his resignation from the board of directors. Microsoft's statement this morning refers specifically to having been in communications with Yahoo's chairman -- presumably Semel -- and his prior refusal to entertain Microsoft's offers.

Here is the publicly released version of Ballmer's offer to Yahoo's board of directors, in its entirety:


January 31, 2008

Board of Directors
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Attention: Roy Bostock, Chairman
Attention: Jerry Yang, Chief Executive Officer

Dear Members of the Board:

I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Microsoft to make a proposal for a business combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!. Under our proposal, Microsoft would acquire all of the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 based on Microsoft's closing share price on January 31, 2008, payable in the form of $31 in cash or 0.9509 of a share of Microsoft common stock. Microsoft would provide each Yahoo! shareholder with the ability to choose whether to receive the consideration in cash or Microsoft common stock, subject to pro-ration so that in the aggregate one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be exchanged for shares of Microsoft common stock and one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be converted into the right to receive cash. Our proposal is not subject to any financing condition.

Our proposal represents a 62% premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock of $19.18 on January 31, 2008. The implied premium for the operating assets of the company clearly is considerably greater when adjusted for the minority, non-controlled assets and cash. By whatever financial measure you use - EBITDA, free cash flow, operating cash flow, net income, or analyst target prices - this proposal represents a compelling value realization event for your shareholders.

We believe that Microsoft common stock represents a very attractive investment opportunity for Yahoo!'s shareholders. Microsoft has generated revenue growth of 15%, earnings growth of 26%, and a return on equity of 35% on average for the last three years. Microsoft's share price has generated shareholder returns of 8% during the last one year period and 28% during the last three year period, significantly outperforming the S&P 500. It is our view that Microsoft has significant potential upside given the continued solid growth in our core businesses, the recent launch of Windows Vista, and other strategic initiatives.

Microsoft's consistent belief has been that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! clearly represents the best way to deliver maximum value to our respective shareholders, as well as create a more efficient and competitive company that would provide greater value and service to our customers. In late 2006 and early 2007, we jointly explored a broad range of ways in which our two companies might work together. These discussions were based on a vision that the online businesses of Microsoft and Yahoo! should be aligned in some way to create a more effective competitor in the online marketplace. We discussed a number of alternatives ranging from commercial partnerships to a merger proposal, which you rejected. While a commercial partnership may have made sense at one time, Microsoft believes that the only alternative now is the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! that we are proposing.

In February 2007, I received a letter from your Chairman indicating the view of the Yahoo! Board that "now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction." According to that letter, the principal reason for this view was the Yahoo! Board's confidence in the "potential upside" if management successfully executed on a reformulated strategy based on certain operational initiatives, such as Project Panama, and a significant organizational realignment. A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.

While online advertising growth continues, there are significant benefits of scale in advertising platform economics, in capital costs for search index build-out, and in research and development, making this a time of industry consolidation and convergence. Today, the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers, and publishers. Synergies of this combination fall into four areas:

  • Scale economics: This combination enables synergies related to scale
    economics of the advertising platform where today there is only one
    competitor at scale. This includes synergies across both search and
    non-search related advertising that will strengthen the value
    proposition to both advertisers and publishers. Additionally, the
    combination allows us to consolidate capital spending.

  • Expanded R&D capacity: The combined talent of our engineering
    resources can be focused on R&D priorities such as a single search
    index and single advertising platform. Together we can unleash new
    levels of innovation, delivering enhanced user experiences,
    breakthroughs in search, and new advertising platform capabilities.
    Many of these breakthroughs are a function of an engineering scale that
    today neither of our companies has on its own.

  • Operational efficiencies: Eliminating redundant infrastructure and
    duplicative operating costs will improve the financial performance of
    the combined entity.

  • Emerging user experiences: Our combined ability to focus engineering
    resources that drive innovation in emerging scenarios such as video,
    mobile services, online commerce, social media, and social platforms is
    greatly enhanced.

We would value the opportunity to further discuss with you how to optimize the integration of our respective businesses to create a leading global technology company with exceptional display and search advertising capabilities. You should also be aware that we intend to offer significant retention packages to your engineers, key leaders and employees across all disciplines.

We have dedicated considerable time and resources to an analysis of a potential transaction and are confident that the combination will receive all necessary regulatory approvals. We look forward to discussing this with you, and both our internal legal team and outside counsel are available to meet with your counsel at their earliest convenience.

Our proposal is subject to the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement and our having the opportunity to conduct certain limited and confirmatory due diligence. In addition, because a portion of the aggregate merger consideration would consist of Microsoft common stock, we would provide Yahoo! the opportunity to conduct appropriate limited due diligence with respect to Microsoft. We are prepared to deliver a draft merger agreement to you and begin discussions immediately.

In light of the significance of this proposal to your shareholders and ours, as well as the potential for selective disclosures, our intention is to publicly release the text of this letter tomorrow morning.

Due to the importance of these discussions and the value represented by our proposal, we expect the Yahoo! Board to engage in a full review of our proposal. My leadership team and I would be happy to make ourselves available to meet with you and your Board at your earliest convenience. Depending on the nature of your response, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!'s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.

We believe this proposal represents a unique opportunity to create significant value for Yahoo!'s shareholders and employees, and the combined company will be better positioned to provide an enhanced value proposition to users and advertisers. We hope that you and your Board share our enthusiasm, and we look forward to a prompt and favorable reply.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Steven A. Ballmer
Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corporation

Update ribbon (small)

9:26 am ET February 1, 2008 - In its own statement this morning, Yahoo confirmed that it is considering what it characterizes as an unsolicited takeover proposal.

"[The] Board of Directors will evaluate this proposal carefully and promptly in the context of Yahoo's strategic plans and pursue the best course of action to maximize long-term value for shareholders," the statement reads.

BetaNews will be covering all aspects of this historic takeover offer throughout the day. Stay in touch with BetaNews for more facts, insight, and analysis.

Add a Comment (56 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By Scotch Moose

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 11:38 AM

Ah ha, the Microsoft live web services strategy has been revealed. Buy a big LAMP application.

If this goes through I will have to update many site registrations with a new email address before Yahoo mail gets munged.

Score: 0

By zridling

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 8:41 AM

This deal only shows how tired and weak Microsoft has become. Can't compete w/Google after how many failed attempts and myriad ad company acquisitions, their best idea is to buy aging, [very distant] second place search engine yahoo?

I'm sure toolie is excited over his favorite company announcing its own obituary. Smells like IBM circa 1981 around Redmond these days.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 4, 2008 - 12:02 PM

How would you know? You've never been there.

Don't you ever get tired of saying MSFT is dying and being dead wrong? Reminds me of Einstein's definition of insanity...

Given enough time, you might actually be right someday. But then again, given enough time, monkeys can write Shakespeare, so don't expect too much credit for it.

Score: 0

By Point Zero

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 2:43 AM

Economy is the first and foremost reason of the depression of a society.

Score: 0

By davidlerner

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 4:41 PM

Alright to everyone who has said or will say that this is a pointless deal for Microsoft you have no idea what you are talking about. This deal was not made up this morning, it has been going for over a year. Microsoft knows what they are paying for. I really hate how a lot of you think that you know what you are talking about because you simply do not. Stop saying how stupid Microsoft is because all it does is make you look like a idiot.

Well thats my 2 cents.

Score: 0

By Niro

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 8:04 AM

Exactly

Score: 0

By acey99

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 2:30 PM

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Did I Mention NO ?

Score: 0

By bloodx

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 12:20 PM

"They didn't block the Verizon/mci merger or the AT&T/SBC/bellsouth merger either. Have you ever heard of a merger being stopped?"

Didn't they block MS from buying Intuit for $5 billion a few years ago.

Score: 0

By spider31

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:37 AM

Interesting, but why.

Maybe they couldn’t get a LIVE number plate :)

Also, try searching for the above letter on google you get 10 results, yahoo 0 and live 0

Search term used "can offer a credible alternative for consumers"

Score: 0

By lvthunder

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:54 AM

The letter says this, "You should also be aware that we intend to offer significant retention packages to your engineers, key leaders and employees across all disciplines."

So Microsoft wants to buy Yahoo's people. The people are probably worth more to Microsoft then the products Yahoo makes.

Score: 0

By DatabaseBen

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 11:38 AM

i doubt that yahoo is worth 33 billion and "have" financial problems. likely yahoo still retains that dot com desease and the financials are grossly overstated if not ridiculously flawed.

that being said, if acquiring yahoo is a move by ms to shut it down, then it should just let yahoo sink by iteself.

however if microsoft wants to do a hostile takeover and pay that much money, then so be it; as it is the american way. i sincerly hope that ms changes the yahoo name to something not as stupid sounding.

yahoo-search is an oxymoron like
bush administration-intelligence

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:50 AM

FYI: Yahoo is more than just Search.

Score: 0

By Aires

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:20 AM

In all seriousness, it will be interesting to see what happens to the Yahoo Groups if Microsoft were to take over Yahoo. When @Home took over Excite, the whole of the Excite Clubs disappeared purely & simply because the Excite Adult Clubs existed. Yahoo has Adult Groups and it will be interesting to see if they survive or if they go, or indeed if all Yahoo Groups go. Let's not forget that Microsoft dumped it's own MSN Groups.

Score: 0

By MikeTechno

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:10 AM

I am not convinced that Yahoo really has any true value. Microsoft is just buying eyeballs here. Nothing more. The problems is, those eyeballs aren't as "skicky" as MS thinks they are.

Bad investment.

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:53 AM

MS is buying what Yahoo own, not just their search. Yahoo mail? Alibaba, just name a few. There are way more than just search.

Score: 0

By marrix

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:36 AM

Mike,
You may well be right. However, recognition factor and that few know of "Live Search", and so it goes.
Where I am (OZ), their tie in with a local TV station has been one of the reasons of the improvement of both YH & 7.
As an aside, rather annoyed, submitted this as a news item some 3 hours earlier than Scott's article, however he is the Boss!

Score: 0

By wolfcat

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 6:06 PM

Add Microsoft are allied with Channel 9 in Australia... could make for some interesting board meetings in Australia if we get a microhoo

Score: 0

By Niro

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:22 AM

Ah...another random poster that seems to think they know better then the heads of the most successful company in the world...I love it.

Score: 0

By pitdingo2

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:46 AM

How is M$ "...the most successful company in the world"?

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 12:12 PM

Well if you do nothing but troll the old M$ all the time it's obvious you would deny. Dont let your blind hatred for all things MS get in the way

Score: 0

By Niro

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 11:54 AM

I dunno Pit...I remember bill gates being the richest man in the world (2nd now to some guy that owns alot of oil)...that's pretty damn successful if you ask me.

Oh wait I forgot who I'm talking to...ofcourse Pit, nintendo is way more successful, don't cry ok? I'll buy you a toy.

How about I re-phrase it a little, "Microsoft one of the most successful companies in the world"...does that dry up your tears a little?

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 6:12 PM

"2nd now to some guy that owns alot of oil"

I thought it was some uber media mogul in Mexico.

Score: 0

By pitdingo2

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 12:02 PM

Bill Gates is a man, not a company. But that is besides the point. You said M$ is the most successful company in the world. All's i was wondering is how you measure "success".

I can say Apple is the most successful company in the world. I could say the same thing about Nintendo. Just depends how you define "successful".

But your rampant M$ fanboism blinded you to that simple question.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 3:53 PM

You are such a Microsoft troll it makes people sick. If you look that is the spelling of the company not M$. Microsoft could buy and sell Apple or Nintendo bet that really pisses you off, pit$ingo?

Score: 0

By pitdingo2

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 5:21 PM

you really have no clue about the '$' thing, do you? Let me give you a hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet

I could care less what M$ "could" buy; the shareholders of those companies would never approve of it.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 4, 2008 - 3:23 PM

Yes, El Dingo... you are the epitome of "1337".

Too bad that lost it's allure to most folks back in the mid 80's.

Of course, you still think "poopy" jokes are amusing, so one shouldn't be all too surprised.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 11:13 AM

I know what you are doing and it is still a childish but not unexpected game that you play. For the love of God get out of your parents basement and get a life. Hate will get you know where. Wiki, I love it, that is so reputable that most colleges will not allow it as a reference.

Score: 0

By Niro

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 9:11 PM

Ahhhhh.....hahahahah!! LOL!!!

This guy wants to be "Leet" so he put uses a $ in place of an S in MS...wow Pit you're so COOL!!!! Where did you learn all this cool stuff?!?!

Score: 0

By yountmj

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 6:16 PM

I guess I'm part of a dying breed who believes that taking the time to use proper grammar and spelling is truly "1337".

"Leet-speak" is quite simply "lazy-speak", and I abhor it... but to each his/her own I suppose.

Score: 0

By pitdingo2

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:15 AM

Yahoo just bought Zimbra last year. Zimbra develops an Exchange competitor. I am sure M$ will kill that off real fast.

Score: 0

By SGD

posted Feb 2, 2008 - 11:16 AM

If it will piss you off I hope they do.

Score: 0

By robmanic44

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:53 AM

Just think about what Microsoft could purchase with this kind of money. Make a list of the companies that would fall in this price range. Sun Microsystems jumps immediately into my mind, but there are lots of others. They could also make themselves the third largest PC vendor in the world if they so desired.

Where the hell is the ROI? Even Microsoft will take some serious time swallowing this.

Score: 0

By cranbers

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 10:01 AM

Lets see where to begin.

1. This truly shows just how much Microsoft absolutely hates google, and will do anything even spend 44 billion on a company to gain a few more search share points.
2. Before this offer is accepted there should be a bidding war just like there was for double cick.
3. If I was an engineer for yahoo, I would be sending Google my resume right about now.

I really don't see where the return would come in. Microsoft already has their own brand, no it doesn't make money. Yahoo isn't making any money either. So how does that make sense, especially when you throw 44 billion at it initially?

My prediction, yahoo name brand dies, Microsot has a bad case of indigestion just like amd/ati merger (not financially though because Microsoft needs to get rid of some extra pocket change). Google search share jumps to 75 percent.

Score: 0

By marrix

edited Feb 2, 2008 - 7:23 AM

This is one of the very rare occasions whereby Cranbers has summed up the situation quite eloquently!
'Though I'm not from the States, brings to mind an earlier post re MS non compliance with judicial rulings.
And, yep I'm old enough to remember the enforced disintegration of the Bell companies.
I also may be wrong here, not unusual, but I understand Google's percentage is 80% and growing.

Score: 0

By rodgerballard

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:52 AM

1. This isn't about hatred for a company, this is about business.
2. ???
3. Your not an engineer at Yahoo!

"Microsoft already has their own brand, no it doesn't make money."

Wrong.

"Yahoo isn't making any money either."

Wrong again.

I predict you will continue to be wrong. =)

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 10:41 AM

It just pure business. It's for the same reason why BoA tookover Country Wide. If you don't understand why, guess you know absolutely nothing about how business and accounting works.

There are more than just search in the US.

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 12:17 PM

BoA the korean singer? Get the feeling I should know what that stands for :)

"There are more than just search in the US"

SO much more its not funny. Its bigger than google in asia.

Score: 0

By swattz101

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 1:18 PM

Bank of America just bought Country Wide Mortage and Loan. (I usually put BofA, though I don't know it that makes a diff. :-)

Score: 0

By Setian^Stalker

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 9:06 PM

oh haha dont I feel silly now :)

Score: 0

By preinterpost

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 5:26 PM

.bofa. what goes into the namespace ;-)

Score: 0

By Niro

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 10:15 AM

Yea cranbers...I'm sure you know better then a few dozen of billionaires, heading the biggest and most successful business on the planet. I'm sure you even know what their business plan is...wow how come you're not that rich with all this amazing knowledge?!

Score: 0

By Program86

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:03 AM

Well said. DONT go to the dark side Yahoo!

Score: 0

By nasserd

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 9:46 AM

This is quite the historic offer. I do not believe there will be much opposition besides Yahoo!'s own board. Globally, there is little overlap between them and if Yahoo!'s tech were ramp towards global needs (and keep some search for Microsoft platform improvement) then it would be great. Removing Yahoo! from the list of search competitors would actually be bad... that's why Microsoft is looking to maintain the brand and unit.

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:27 AM

I believe the Yahoo brand will stay. Yahoo still function as a separate division. The only change will make is the ads, where they generate most of their revenue.

Score: 0

By odarky

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 10:44 AM

this is insane...44.6 billions is a lot of money..

their products are colliding everywhere... if this is just for making sure Live Search + Yahoo search to compete with Google..... it's a bit to much.

this could turn out as bad as AOL+Timewarner or could keep Google on their toes.

but man..im shocked!

Updated: well i just heard that Justice dept. "interested" to review the bids....lol here we go again!!!

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

edited Feb 1, 2008 - 9:31 AM

*jaw drops*

Meh... a little thought (and just a little, it's early yet) leads me to believe this will never actually happen.

The FTC will block it, special interests will block it, MSFT is the "Big Monopoly"™, right?

Score: 0

By marrix

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 12:03 PM

PCT,
My jaw is dropping at the lack of subtly in your as usual erudite comments as a proponent of all Microsoft.
I'm most curious "special interest will block it",
shall I find one of your comments re the Google & Double Click merger.
However, all flaming aside, the beauty of the web notwithstanding MS may eventually require we pisanos' wear a barcode & RFID embedded, there will always be pockets of resistance.
101, can't kill human nature, all the more reason to nuke 'em.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 2:01 PM

*laughs*

Did I leave you with the assumption that I *wanted* it to be blocked?

That was surely *not* my intention...

Score: 0

By xyzcb1

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:28 AM

I doubt FTC will step in this time. I mean after all, Google has over 50% of the search and they approved the buyout of Double Click.

Like other poster have mentioned, it's Microsoft.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:03 AM

Exactly. It's Microsoft. ;)

Score: 0

By cranbers

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:07 AM

They didn't block the Verizon/mci merger or the AT&T/SBC/bellsouth merger either. Have you ever heard of a merger being stopped? I mean quite literally I think Microsoft could buy Apple AND Red hat AND Novell AND sun AND even oracle and there still would be no halting the mergers and acquisition game going on in telecom/communications world.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 11:05 AM

Heh...

AT&T

Bell

SBC

Funny, but none of them seem to be MSFT, a company that has been witch-hunted for decades now in this country and blamed for damn near everything from the failure of Linux to reach the desktop to Global Warming.

Score: 0

By Galway

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 2:16 PM

Ahem ... Its Global Climate Change now. Where was you when the memo went around ?

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 4:55 PM

I got it. I just took it outside, poured gas on it, and burned it.

It made me feel much better.

Score: 0

By Neoprimal

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:29 AM

That's because I'm pretty sure someone or maybe a group of people were on a couple others payrolls...really, I can't say that. But you're right...If ATT/SBC and Bellsouth (which btw are made up of a bunch of other merged companies) can all merge, then anything can happen.

Score: 0

By Bogunch

posted Feb 1, 2008 - 10:25 AM

Yes, but the mergers you mention do not include MS. Because it is MS and their perceived past practices, it will be very carefully scrutinized .... especially in the EU.

Score: 0