Mozilla Fixes Firefox Protocol Handling

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published July 31, 2007, 2:10 PM

This morning, Firefox 2.0 users were automatically notified of the availability of version 2.0.0.6, with the promise that this time around, a critical vulnerability concerning how the browser tries to parse malformed resource identifiers, is fixed for good.

In its security advisory this morning, Mozilla credited Windows security expert Jesper Johansson for articulating the original problem, which has hopefully led to this final solution.

"Jesper Johansson pointed out that Mozilla did not percent-encode spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external programs for handling," the advisory reads, "which can cause the receiving program to mistakenly interpret a single URI as multiple arguments. The danger depends on the arguments supported by the specific receiving program, though at the very least we know Firefox (and Thunderbird) 2.0.0.4 and older could be used to run arbitrary script."

While Mozilla's admission was arguably gracious and sincere, there's a rational debate in the developer community over whether the real problem was caused by either major brand of Web browser -- Firefox or Internet Explorer -- or rather by the underlying Windows operating system which passes on the malformed argument in the first place.

Yesterday, the US-CERT bureau of the Dept. of Homeland Security indicated that Microsoft's handling of the ShellExecute() API function, which was changed in systems where IE7 is installed, may be the true culprit. The implication there is that a danger may continue to exist so long as that critical function can pass non-standard parameters to programs it's trying to launch, such as Web browsers.

The advisory then credits VeriSign security consultants Billy Rios and Nate McFeders for discovering that, when Firefox received a ShellExecute() call to the mailto:// URI identifier that included an officially disallowed null (%00) parameter, rather than launch the default mail client, Firefox would launch whatever application was responsible for the filename extension at the end of the URI.

Starting with version 2.0.0.6, Firefox will no longer launch external protocol handler applications without first asking the user. In the event that the site placing the external launch call isn't trusted, it won't launch any programs at all.

The exception is for the mailto:// protocol, where Firefox will launch the preferred mail client without asking the user. The advisory gives users a workaround, which involves editing the program's about:config page, for having Firefox ask the user before launching the mail client.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Or at least until it breaks again!
---> is fixed for good

Score: 0

|

This browser requires patches on a daily basis,I wonder could this be a sign.Yes friends, Opera is the way to go.

Score: 0

|

Opera is a fine browser, but Firefox renders pages way faster than it.

Score: 0

|

I'm cool with Firefox being updated on a regular basis. At least Mozilla recognizes these problems and fixes them fairly quicky, even if it does mean having to update twice in two weeks.

Anyways, I won't switch browsers just because it "requires patches on a daily basis."

Score: 0

|

Oh for crying out loud...so it gets patched daily - at no cost to you...

Deal with it!

If you don't like something then don't use it.

Don't even get me started on Opera...its java implementation sucks and it doesnt have as many options/plugins as most other popular browsers (see, do not like it when people bash your favorite product do ya?). That being said, Opera is pretty zippy due to its small size and lack of plugins - right now its off most exploiters radar due to its minimal popularity.

Score: 0

|

Canadian English is hard to understand. ^_^
I've updated my Firefox. I think its name should be changed to Firefix. ~~~~~~

Score: 0

|

I think you mean about:config on the last line, not about:.

Score: 0

|

I've always wonder if they use the Canadian spelling of that up north...

Is it "aboot:config"? :p

Score: 0

|

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

HP to acquire 3Com for $2.7 B in cash, focus on China

A long and uncertain comeback trail comes to an end for the one-time network equipment giant.

Universities reject Kindle DX as a textbook replacement

Two universities running Kindle DX pilot programs have rejected the device.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Bing vs. Google rematch on video search

After Microsoft folds some old MSN Video features back into Bing, do they add to the search engine's functionality or take away?

Bing gets geekier with new Wolfram Alpha integration

Microsoft's Bing is now teamed up with Wolfram Alpha for computational search results.

New EU telecoms framework mandates user consent before getting cookies

Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want...Are you annoyed yet? That's a preview of 2011.

The Samsung Intrepid: A nice phone, if you can accept Windows Mobile

Samsung appears to have built solid enough hardware, but it's the software that seems uncomfortable and unintuitive.