MySpace Joins Google to Take On Facebook and Microsoft
By Nate Mook and Ed Oswald | Published November 1, 2007, 7:55 PM
BetaNews has learned that amidst MySpace's move to join Google's OpenSocial community, Microsoft is now in talks with Facebook to integrate Windows Live ID into the quickly growing social network.
Reliable sources tell BetaNews that the two companies have begun talks on integrating login systems following an advertising agreement that gives Microsoft a 1.6 percent stake in Facebook in exchange for $240 million.
Microsoft previously pushed its Passport authentication system -- now renamed to Windows Live ID -- on third-party sites such as eBay. But that effort was eventually abandoned and Microsoft has focused on making Live ID work across the Redmond company's own services, including its Xbox Live gaming platform.
With Google's move to become the primary platform for social networking-based applications, however, Microsoft appears to have changed course. Late Thursday came news that MySpace would join Google's newly announced OpenSocial API platform, handing a huge win to the search giant. Bebo and others like Friendster are also joining Google.
Facebook was the first site to truly open up for third party developers to create mini-applications that can run on users' profiles. Companies are eager to tap into the massive visitor bases on social networking sites, which gives them instant exposure and an audience that could potentially bring in revenues. The largest Facebook applications count millions of users, which would not have been possible without the viral nature of the site.
While many of Facebook's rivals announced plans to develop their own open platforms, almost everyone has now opted to join Google on OpenSocial. Google said it has been working with MySpace for a year on building the platform, which began shortly after the two companies inked a $900 million advertising agreement.
With the addition of MySpace and Bebo, Google now counts far more users than Facebook, so developers may opt to create applications for OpenSocial rather than the individual site. Facebook was apparently not told of Google's plans, but the site could still add compatibility for OpenSocial's APIs. However, that would mean Facebook loses control of the platform to Google, which may be difficult for the company to accept.
Bebo, meanwhile, plans to release an API that would allow the conversion of Facebook applications to be compatible with OpenSocial, according to reports. This could make it easy for existing developers to immediate gain access to users on MySpace and other OpenSocial sites. Facebook requires the use of a proprietary language called FBML, while Google is utilizing HTML and JavaScript.
At the end of the day, however, it's still not clear how big of a market there is for applications running on social networking sites. While a handful such as Slide and iLike have garnered millions of users, most developers count mere thousands. In addition, no application developer has found a good way to monetize those users - something that Google will surely be focused on through OpenSocial.
Industry pundit Michael Arrington expects Facebook to join Google, because if it doesn't the site will look like the closed outsider.
"For their part, Google will certainly want Facebook's participation. But they had to get everyone else on board first, before Facebook would even consider it," Arrington wrote on his TechCrunch blog. "An open platform means no social network has any advantage over any other when it comes to third party applications. The playing field has been evened, and no one wins. Except Google. They always win."
But Microsoft, with its newfound ties to Facebook, may not want to give in so easily - especially if it is successful in adding Windows Live ID to the site. The two companies could attempt to leverage Microsoft's huge developer community and create their own standard that also spans Windows Live Spaces, setting up a showdown with Google and MySpace.
In a perfect world, Google would've invested in Facebook rather than Microsoft.
I really hoped that Google and Facebook wouldn't end up on opposite sides, but alas, my hope failed me...
C'mon Google, snatch up Facebook BEFORE Microsoft does...
Score: 0
|microsoft is EVIL. google is better, but not perfect, they got too many privacy issues
Score: 0
|Who has time for this stuff? Myspace, Facebook, MyBook, SpaceFace... etc etc. I try and avoid these virtual hells, it helps if you actually have a real life though.
Score: 0
|For once I fully agree with Imafurby, have no idea of these social networks. There is no absolutely way I'll ever know, never been to one even if linked to something I am perusing.
Not only do I not have the time to waste, simply cannot get a handle on these sites, those that matter know where to find me!
Score: 0
|Like M$, Google is evil!
Score: 0
|At least with MS, they don't collect your information like Google does.
Score: 0
|"Sure its evil, but at least they don't know where you live".
Score: 0
|And what do you think Facebook is?
Score: 0
|thats what you think
Score: 0
|I take it then you didn't notice that the paper cut you get opening the CD envelope for Windows always manages to spill that one drop of blood directly onto the license?
Score: 0
|They do collect information the same way, MSN Search and all the live, software, messenger, maps, etc etc collect your info
Score: 0
|Uhh, clearly Michael Arrington has no concept of how businesses actually work.
You see, when companies compete, consumers always win, because the companies are continually trying to one-up each other in order to gain customer attention (and money). That's what business is all about, and it's a little thing I like to call "capitalism." Can you say capitalism? Sure, I knew that you could.
The best part with this situation is that the rivalries between Facebook and MySpace coupled with Microsoft and Google rivalries will mean that all four companies will be working hard to better the social networking experience. This will mean a big win for all four companies as well as their users.
Some people, such as myself, will be on both platforms just because people we want to keep in touch with will be on one or the other. Some will choose one because of reasons A, B, and C, while others will choose the other because of reasons X, Y, and Z.
Regardless, people will flock to these "over valued" sites because in reality-- there is no way to put an accurate value on humanity's constant need for attention and connection to others. That is what makes these services so wildly popular, and social networking sites will continue to be popular until a better social networking method is available.
Score: 0
|"The playing field has been evened, and no one wins. Except Google. They always win."
exactly. they are the go to people for almost any mainstream web use.
Score: 0
|OVER VALUED these sites are...
Score: 0
|You know how "When companies compete, we win*"?
This is a pretty weird way of winning.
* - Also I'm pretty sure this is broken.
Score: 0
|when companies compete, a company looses, wich means theres no compitition, and well.. we loose
by we, im speaking about myself, as the one of many in the general public
Score: 0
|