Nokia case against Qualcomm in ITC declared 'finished'

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published November 21, 2007, 3:48 PM

It would appear infringement cases against Qualcomm by Nokia are unraveling all over the world, as a judge upholds a decision last month to dismiss an ITC proceeding in the US.

US International Trade Commission spokesperson John Greer is quoted by Reuters this afternoon as saying, "The case is finished at the ITC," referring to an administrative judge's ruling today effectively upholding last month's dismissal of Nokia's infringement claims against Qualcomm.

The fight itself between the two companies is far from over; in fact, it's the fact that they're fighting in another court on the same matter that prompted the ITC to dismiss the case there. It doesn't have jurisdictional authority over a US district court, and perhaps Nokia should have thought of that before seeking an injunction from the ITC against the sale of handsets with Qualcomm parts in the US.

In case the fight has become so complex that the subject has become forgotten, the spat erupted last spring when Nokia claimed Qualcomm owed it substantial royalties for use of its WCDMA/UMTS patents. Nokia still argues that in civil court, which is partly why the ITC can't impose an injunction now.

Analysts today speculated on the possibility that the two companies could emerge from arbitration with a new royalties agreement, where Qualcomm still pays Nokia but ends up paying less than before - perhaps a 2% royalty on sales rather than the current 4%.

Today's news wraps up a trifecta for Qualcomm. Last week, a court in The Hague threw out a claim by Nokia that Qualcomm had exhausted its right to enforce its patents there, with regard to chips sold by Texas Instruments in the Netherlands in 2000. The court there said Nokia's claims were too vague and non-specific. Three weeks earlier, a German court dismissed the same claim, for the same reason.

View comments by with a score of at least

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?