On second thought, Microsoft probably won't buy SAP

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published December 4, 2007, 6:49 PM

At the end of the day Tuesday, SAP finally denied speculation that the company might be acquired by Microsoft. But analysts tended to doubt those rumors anyway. Here's why.

SAP AG Chief Executive Henning Kagermann has reportedly finally put rumors to rest that his company has been talking with Microsoft about some sort of acquisition of the German-based software giant. But even in the absence of a flatout denial from either SAP or Microsoft, analysts contacted earlier this week found the possibility a bit hard to swallow -- and wondered how the conjecturing even got started.

To kick off the tempest, a account from the Reuters news agency last night --republished today in a number of US media outlets -- said that shares of SAP had soared in European markets throughout the trading day amid speculation that Microsoft might buy SAP.

Then, throughout the day Tuesday, the US press offices of both Microsoft and SAP declined comment about the potential deal on inquiries from BetaNews and other news media, with each company consistently citing policies against commenting on "rumors and speculation."

Finally, about an hour and a half away from the US trading day, Reuters issued a second report, this time quoting Kagermann as denying rumors of discussions with Microsoft on Tuesday at a SAP press conference in Boston.

In the first Reuters report, Bruce Richardson, an analyst for AMR Research, was quoted as doubting the rumors on the basis that SAP isn't growing fast enough to be among the types of software vendors Microsoft likes to acquire.

Speaking with BetaNews on Tuesday, James Kobielus, an analyst at Current Analysis Inc., concurred that SAP doesn't meet the profile of the typical Microsoft acquired property. But Kobielus saw some different distinctions.

SAP, he said, is much larger than the sorts of vendors Microsoft generally acquires. "Microsoft isn't at all like Oracle. Microsoft doesn't usually go out and buy companies the size of a PeopleSoft or Siebel," he pointed out.

Beyond that, although Microsoft and SAP have been partnering to some extent for years, Microsoft uses a .NET code base, as opposed to SAP's "100 percent Java code base," Kobielus told BetaNews. The analyst suggested that this lack of similarity in underlying software code might well pose difficulties in integrating product line-ups.

Moreover, he also raised the possibility that, in acquiring SAP, Microsoft might leave itself open to industry fears of monopolization, especially in that both of these huge vendors have been so active in software markets such as BI (business intelligence) and CRM (customer relationship management).

But what could have been the underlying basis of this week's Microsoft/SAP rumor? According to one theory going around, this week's rumor made a certain amount of sense, in that way back during the Microsoft antitrust trials earlier in the decade, Microsoft did admit to earlier talks with SAP about a possible acquisition of the German company.

But Kobielus offered another potential explanation, too. With all of the recent acquisition momentum in the software business, and the December holidays on the way, "the industry just seemed to kind of feel that a major acquisition was somehow due," the analyst said.

In one of these recent acquisitions, SAP is picking up BI software vendor Business Objects, for example.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Duh...

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."

Uh-oh, netbooks -- not Windows 7 -- will lift 2009 PC sales

Santa may bring a lump of coal to the Windows PC industry this holiday season. Netbook sales will sap PC margins, while weak Windows 7 PC sales could further drive down average selling prices.

Google's value proposition for Chrome OS: Should we feel insulted?

For a search engine that has direct access to all the world's online history, it appears to have taught Google nothing about selling a machine.

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

Microsoft's .NET Micro Framework is now free and open source

The latest version of Microsoft's .NET Micro framework is now in the hands of the FOSS community.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.