Patent infringement decision against eBay upheld

By Tim Conneally, BetaNews

December 13, 2007, 12:12 PM

MercExchange, a tiny Virginia-based company that has taken eBay to all levels of the US court system for patent infringement, has won at the District Court level in Virginia.

MercExchange holds patents for e-commerce solutions that involve internet auctions, what it calls "name a price" systems, dynamic pricing models, desktop messaging, as well as streaming and multicasting.

The company sought to license one of its patents to eBay and Half.com as it does with sites AutoTrader.com, channeladvisor, uBid, Overture, and ReturnBuy. But when an agreement was not reached, MercExchange filed patent infringement suits against the two companies, seeking an injunction.

The Patent in question was US Patent 5,845,265, which includes language describing an automated system for selling items online and accepting listings of items for sale electronically from remote participants. Apparently eBay's "BuyItNow" feature infringes upon an idea detailed in that patent.

But the Supreme Court ruled that even after a jury has found a technology to be in violation of a patent, a patentee is not automatically entitled to a permanent injunction, as MercExchange's lawyers attempted to claim. Injunctions are left to be solutions to problems where simple monetary compensation is not enough.

While an injunction at the Supreme Court level failed, the most recent court ruling by Virginia District Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of the smaller company, levying a $30 million fine against eBay.

eBay said in a statement yesterday that it plans to appeal the ruling, but MercExchange may not be able to handle much further litigation. As the Associated Press recently reported, the company has dwindled in size from a staff of over 40, to a staff of just three.

Add a Comment (6 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By cory1492

edited Dec 13, 2007 - 3:10 PM

argh, sorry on the double.

Score: 0

By cory1492

posted Dec 13, 2007 - 3:10 PM

So what, every single site that has fixed price merchandise (which is what "buy it now" is technically) should be paying MercExchange? How the hell did that happen, then?

I DO remember a "best offer" method of bidding at eBay being instituted in the last couple years, perhaps that is what MercExchange has the problem with wrather than "Buy it now"?

Score: 0

By kholdstare

posted Dec 13, 2007 - 2:02 PM

lol all ebay has to do id win the appeal and the small company will be bankrupt.

Score: 0

By Banquo

edited Dec 13, 2007 - 1:16 PM

This is totally stupid. How can you patent such a basic idea? It shouldn't be allowed.

Score: 0

By rsmiff

posted Dec 13, 2007 - 1:09 PM

What a joke!! This patent crap is out of control. They're basically out of business, obviously did not take full advantage of the patents they supposedly own. They should have absolutely no rights to those patents if they have no means to institute them themselves. Instead they create revenue by sitting on their bums and suing everyone else. What a grand business model.

Score: 0

By Straspey

posted Dec 13, 2007 - 2:37 PM

I hate to tell you this, but I own the exclusive patent to the rights for placing a double exclamation point ( !! ) at the end of any three-word sentence which appears at the beginning of a paragraph.

You'll be hearing from my lawyers in the morning.

Score: 0