Safari license says non-Apple hardware installs are prohibited

By Ed Oswald | Published March 27, 2008, 12:55 PM

In its rush to bring Safari to the Windows platform, it looks like Apple's legal department didn't quite do its job.

Apple enthusiast site 9to5mac discovered that within both the licensing agreement presented at install and the PDF which accompanies the products, Safari's license agreement still prohibits installs on computers that aren't "Apple-labeled." While this is most definitely an oversight on Cupertino's part, for the time being, any Windows install is technically illegal.

Since Bootcamp is Windows running on the Mac platform, an install of Windows Safari there would be acceptable under these terms. Legal experts say there is nothing to worry about however, as Apple cannot enforce an agreement that doesn't make sense.

Either way, it makes the folks at Cupertino look like they are not doing their homework.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

I guess that means I can't attach my automatic nose hair clipper. Just have to wait until the lord god Jobs decides to make one and then run one of his brilliant yet now getting boring promotional campaigns.

Score: 0

|

This just in: Several software engineer's and lawyers were out on the streets of cupertino looking for jobs today. Signs they held said "We ****ed up badly, please hire us!"

Score: 0

|

Yay, now sue Apple for:

1) Forcing it through a routine software update
2) Making such a big legal mistake

Only in America...

Score: 0

|

Oops...

Score: 0

|

I downloaded Safari and tried it out. The funny part is, it shows the index page on my own personal website with a wrong sized table at the bottom.

The other pages are duplicates of the index with different pictures and text and they all appear fine. Firefox shows them properly, as does IE5,6, and 7.

Go figure.

Score: 0

|

Well something's got to be different then (check for crazy unicode characters), or you've changed the coding recently and it's cached it.

These things don't just invent themselves.

Score: 0

|

While this is most definitely an oversight on Cupertino's part

it makes the folks at Cupertino look like they are not doing their homework.

Eh?

Since when was the city of Cupertino responsible for Apple EULAs?

In case you weren't aware, Ed; Cupertino is a city in California. Apple, Inc. is a company.

Score: 0

|

You need to know that Apple, Inc. corporate head quarters is located in Cupertino.

Reporters use Cupertino as referrence to the Apple head quarters like they use Redmond for Microsoft.

Score: 0

|

You need to know that Apple, Inc. corporate head quarters is located in Cupertino.

That so, Sherlock? Mighty clever deduction on your part... (IOW: Duh?)

Reporters use Cupertino as referrence to the Apple head quarters like they use Redmond for Microsoft.

Who says I don't hate the use of Redmond (the City) to describe Microsoft?

It's not that hard, folks. One is a city, and one is a company.

an oversight on Cupertino's part

Carries with it implications. If I lived in Cupertino, I'd be pissed. They had nothing to do with it.

Score: 0

|

No kidding, I didnt know what Cupertino was. lol

Score: 0

|

Regardless,

News journalism should be specific, not "cute".

Score: 0

|

Yes, I agree with that.

Score: 0

|

Considering how often something like this is used, I think the vast majority of people reading understood that the "folks in Cupertino" was a reference to Apple's employees involved in all of this, not necessarily all or just random people of the city of Cupertino. So, on a technicality, sure, it's a "fun" thing to point out, but in reality it's not that irrational or unusual.

Score: 0

|

It's non-specific, and pretty insulting to the folks in Cupertino when you are, in essence, blaming them for failure on Apple's part.

Just making a point. I know where Apple is located.

Score: 0

|

I know enough people in Cupertino, quite a few of which read this article, who didn't even think of it that way, let alone were insulted or affected in any way at all.

Score: 0

|

Good for you/them?

Score: 0

|

It sure is.

Score: 0

|

This is really a non-issue, it will be remedied shortly.

Score: 0

|

Yes, this is true. It's also impossible for them to actually act on the EULA.

Still, it is funny.

I popped a Apple sticker on my laptop, though, just to be sure.

Score: 0

|

If it's not an Apple that's against the sticker EULA.

Score: 0

|

Damn, I'm hosed.

Score: 0

|

LOL

Score: 0

|

lol.

Score: 0

|

...who cares...?

Score: 0

|

People who find humor in the slip-ups of powerful entities.

So...

...pretty much everyone.

Score: 0

|

Benjimen Linus....
Everybody gets a laugh out of it but you.

Score: 0

|

So, does this mean they'll stop pushing Safari through the stupid Apple Updater on my Windows machines?

Score: 0

|

Hahaha. No silly.

The more people they push it on to, the more people they can sue!

/overdramatic

Score: 0

|

And how long has Safari for Windows been around. It just goes to show they can put anything in there and no one will read it.

Score: 0

|

That is absolutely hilarious! Thanks for the laugh!

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

AOL's decision to rebrand as Aol. takes a bad brand and makes it worse

The idea behind the social Web is to crowd source before bringing out something new. But not at AOL, which new logo debuted with a cry of "fail!" across the blogosphere and Twittersphere today.

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."