Senate antitrust chief demands answers on US text messaging prices

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published September 12, 2008, 3:45 PM

The price of text messaging in the US has doubled over the past three years, and the chairman of the US Senate Antitrust Subcommittee is now asking the heads of the the nation's four biggest wireless phone companies why.

In a letter, US Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) has requested an explanation of the texting price hikes from the CEOs and presidents of Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, giving them a deadline of October 6, 2008 to answer his questions.

"Your four companies are the nation's leading wireless telephone companies, collectively serving more than 90% of the nation's wireless subscribers," the senator wrote.

"Since 2005, the cost for a consumer to send or receive a text message over each of your services has increased by 100%. Text messages were commonly priced at 10 cents per message sent or received in 2005. As of the end of the month, the rate per text message will have increased to 20 cents on all four wireless carriers."

Kohl pointed out that Sprint-Nextel was the first carrier to increase the text message rate to 20 cents last fall -- and that, before the start of October, all of its three main competitors will have matched this price increase.

As previously reported in BetaNews, earlier this week, the CTIA industry wireless association released a study indicating that the use of text messaging is booming in the US -- despite the price jumps -- and that wireless services on the whole are also picking up momentum.

Although average local cell phone bills will drop to $48.54 per month this year, US wireless carriers will rake in nearly $144 billion in yearly service revenues, with about 20 percent of this total going for data services such as text messaging, games, Web browsing, and ringtones, according to the CTIA's survey of wireless carriers.

The use of SMS for texting and MMS for sending pictures and multimedia messages from phones is particularly on the upswing. For the month of June 2008 only, wireless carriers' reports showed a total of 75 billion text messages, a gain of 160% over the 28.8 billion texts reported for June 2007.

Senator Kohl, however, issued his letter to the four wireless carriers on September 9, the day before the public announcement of the CTIA's survey results.

In his letter, the Senate committee chair said he finds it particularly worrisome that the rate increases don't appear to be justified by any rise in the cost of delivering text messages, and that all four companies have raised their prices to the same level at about the same time.

"Text messaging files are very small, as the size of text messages are generally limited to 160 characters per message, and therefore cost carriers very little to transmit. Text messaging files are a fraction of the size of e-mails or music downloads," the senator observed.

"What has changed in recent years is the level of consolidation in the wireless telephone industry. The number of major national competitors has declined from six to four. And the large national wireless carriers continue to acquire their smaller, regional competitors, with the announced acquisition of Alltel by Verizon Wireless being just the latest example. As Chairman of the Antitrust Subcommittee, I am concerned with whether this consolidation, and increased market power by the major carriers, has contributed to this doubling of text messaging rates over the last three years," according to Kohl.

"Therefore, I specifically ask each of your companies to explain why text messaging rates have dramatically increased in recent years. Please explain the cost, technical, or any other factors that justify a 100% increase in the cost of text messaging from 2005 to 2008. Please also provide data on the utilization of text messaging during this time period. Please provide a comparison of prices charged for text messaging as compared to other services offered by your companies, such as prices per minute for voice calling, prices for sending e-mails, and prices charged for data services such as internet access over wireless devices, from 2005 to the present," he wrote.

"Finally, please state whether your text messaging pricing structure differs in any significant respect from the pricing of your three main competitors. Please provide this information no later than Monday, October 6, 2008."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

From a strictly personal standpoint: They can charge all they want for text messaging via cell phone.
There isn't a chance in hell I'm going to use my cell phone to text message when I can just dial the number and TALK to the person at the other end.
I think kids are entitled to enjoy the fad... as well as the costs incurred.

Score: 0

|

And yet there is still no groundswell of consumers demanding the opening (unlocking) of phones purchased independently of a service provider and for the right to transport them from one compatible network to another if they change service provider...

Amazing.

And yeah, use excessive texting rates to subsidize some asinine social engineering scheme. You know, if the liberals feel we aren't paying our fair share of taxes, I don't know of any who are exercising their freedom to send the government a check on their own to satisfy their guilt...oh, but I forget, their wacko notions are only for OTHERS to follow!

Score: 0

|

I'm not sure about other service providers but I am a T-Mobile customer and have had all my phones unlocked whenever my contract came up for renewal and was sent a new phone. All you need to do is call customer service and tell them you are going out of the country and want to use your phone somewhere they have no service such as Venezuela. They will walk you through unlocking process. I don't know if they are required by law to do this or they simply do it as a courtesy. I am very happy with TMob right now because I get good service in my area but if I move and want to switch my phone will already be unlocked. I hate locked phones.

@Owilliams:
I agree. Only parents are impacted by these excessive messaging charges because kids practically live off text messaging/AIM. It's much much faster to dial the phone and talk with someone than it is to message back and forth. I mostly send text as a replacement for leaving a voice mail since that comes up right on your phone instead of having to dial your mailbox and listening to a garbled message.

Score: 0

|

I am glad to hear they do it.

However, they are not required to supply the codes, not when you buy the phone nor when you leave their service.

And watch the expression on most providers faces when you walk in and want your 'old' phone (assuming it is compatible) enabled on your account. Manager please...just for entertainment sake, go to an AT&T service outlet and request it...

Score: 0

|

I don't mind higher text message charges, so long as I see one or two of the following things happen:

1. Text charge increases go solely towards the development and implementation of new communications methods (LTE and beyond).

2. Charge increases go towards lower-level worker salary and hourly wage increases and/or health care and benefits packages. These guys are your backbone, reward them!

3. Charge increases go towards "Don't txt and drive" education campaigns in states that do not have laws prohibiting the practice.

Score: 0

|

Sounds like someone just got their kid's phone bill...

Score: 0

|

Just on text messaging!? That's all he can see in the telco/data space?

LOL! I think this guy needs a vacation at Charlie Rangel's Dominican Republic property...

Score: 0

|

Write to Senator Kohl...

http://kohl.senate.gov/gen_contact.html

It's not just text messaging... the entire cellular industry has run amok... not to mention Comcast !!!!

Score: 0

|

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Bing vs. Google rematch on video search

After Microsoft folds some old MSN Video features back into Bing, do they add to the search engine's functionality or take away?

HP to acquire 3Com for $2.7 B in cash, focus on China

A long and uncertain comeback trail comes to an end for the one-time network equipment giant.

Bing gets geekier with new Wolfram Alpha integration

Microsoft's Bing is now teamed up with Wolfram Alpha for computational search results.

Universities reject Kindle DX as a textbook replacement

Two universities running Kindle DX pilot programs have rejected the device.

New EU telecoms framework mandates user consent before getting cookies

Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want...Are you annoyed yet? That's a preview of 2011.

The Samsung Intrepid: A nice phone, if you can accept Windows Mobile

Samsung appears to have built solid enough hardware, but it's the software that seems uncomfortable and unintuitive.

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.