Sneak preview: Polaroid PoGo printer for instant digital photo printouts

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published June 11, 2008, 3:38 PM

Today at the Bluetooth SIG press event in New York City, Polaroid previewed a pint-sized, inkless portable printer dubbed the PoGo, that can turn your digital camera into a modern equivalent of the old Polaroid Instant.

NEW YORK CITY (BetaNews) - Remember those old Polaroid instant cameras from the latter half of the 20th century? (Would you believe they still make them?) Today at a Bluetooth SIG press event, Polaroid showed off its PoGo portable printer, which uses a Bluetooth link from a cell phone's camera to make your handset into a modern SX-70 equivalent.

In a demo for BetaNews at the event, Andy Mitchelides, senior marketing associate, showed how a photo file can be sent to the printer wirelessly from a cell phone for printout on business card-sized pieces of paper less than a minute later -- all without the hassle of either film or printer cartridges.

Mitchelides told BetaNews that, to avoid the need for ink cartridges, the PoGo uses ZINK (Zero Ink) technology from a company called ZINK Imaging.

Polaroid, long the king of film-based instant cameras, used a focus group to help choose the name PoGo for its first entry into the new realm of digital instant photography.

The Bluetooth 2.0-enabled PoGo will become available July 6 for $199, exclusively in Best Buy stores. The accompanying paper, also to be sold at Best Buy, will be priced at around $3.99 for ten 2- by- 3-inch-sheets.

"That's only about 30 or 40 cents per sheet -- a lot less than for larger printouts. And you can literally carry this printer in your pocket," BetaNews was told.

The paper will be equipped with a sticky backing. So if you want to display the resulting photo on your laptop or lapel, for instance, you can.

View comments by with a score of at least

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Where did Apple's Black Friday sales go?

According to one analyst, Apple sold nearly four fewer Macs per hour on Black Friday than same day a year ago. Now why is that?

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?