Vonage Retrial Request Denied

By Nate Mook | Published May 3, 2007, 4:03 PM

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied Vonage's request that a patent infringement ruling against it be vacated and the case sent back to the lower court for a retrial. The company can, however, reference the matter in its appeal brief, due next Wednesday.

Vonage's request followed a ruling Monday by the U.S. Supreme Court that called into question the patentability of "obvious" inventions. Verizon sued the company for infringing on its voice over IP patents, but Vonage claims the patents should not be considered valid.

The denial for a retrial is a minor blow to Vonage's case, but the company reiterated Thursday that it has no impact on the overall appeal - which it expects to win. Verizon officials made no comment on the decision.

"Vonage continues to believe the original verdict was based on erroneous claim construction - meaning the patents in this case were defined in an overly broad and legally unprecedented way," the company said in a statement.

Verizon sued Vonage in June 2006, accusing the fledgling voice over IP firm of knowingly infringing on patents related to functionality such as call forwarding and fraud detection. A jury agreed with Verizon in early March, awarding the company damages of $58 million in addition to a 5.5 percent royalty on all future Vonage sales.

An oral hearing regarding the appeal is scheduled for June 25. If Vonage loses the appeal, it could be hit with a permanent injunction that would bar it from using Verizon's technology, forcing the company to settle or potentially face a shutdown of its Internet telephone service.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Ouch. But they can bring up their existing arguments in the appeal. So their current concerns will be ultimately heard.

Score: 0

|

Scene: Verizon guy calls Vonage customer

Verizon guy: "Can you hear me now?"

*complete silence*

Verizon guy: "Goooooooood."

Score: 0

|

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

HP to acquire 3Com for $2.7 B in cash, focus on China

A long and uncertain comeback trail comes to an end for the one-time network equipment giant.

Universities reject Kindle DX as a textbook replacement

Two universities running Kindle DX pilot programs have rejected the device.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Bing vs. Google rematch on video search

After Microsoft folds some old MSN Video features back into Bing, do they add to the search engine's functionality or take away?

Bing gets geekier with new Wolfram Alpha integration

Microsoft's Bing is now teamed up with Wolfram Alpha for computational search results.

New EU telecoms framework mandates user consent before getting cookies

Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want...Are you annoyed yet? That's a preview of 2011.

The Samsung Intrepid: A nice phone, if you can accept Windows Mobile

Samsung appears to have built solid enough hardware, but it's the software that seems uncomfortable and unintuitive.