Want to Test Vista? Better Act Fast

By Ed Oswald | Published June 29, 2006, 4:00 PM

Microsoft UK .NET platform product manager Ian Moulster wrote in a post to his personal Web log that the company will cut access to Windows Vista Beta 2 on Friday, as the company has reached the number of testers it was looking to give access to through its Customer Preview Program.

Moulster gave some tips to those who want to beat the cutoff and ensure they have access to a copy of the Vista beta and Release Candidate builds. Users should start their downloads today, as Microsoft plans to maintain download servers until July 14, which means the download could be stopped and restarted later.

Additionally, users should ensure they have a product key, and activate their copy. "We may be able to provide people who have activated copies with future...stuff," Moulster wrote. "I'm being vague because I need to be, just trust me and make sure you activate."

Microsoft has been "blown away" by the amount of interest in Vista Beta 2, Moulster said. He also said that the company does not have a planned cutoff for the Office 2007 Beta 2, but access could be cut to that product as well in the future.

A spokesperson for Microsoft has confirmed Moulster's comments, saying the end of the Customer Preview Program would occur "shortly."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

How can I get a serial nr to activate windows Vista?

Score: 0

|

Activating it means you will be allowed access to the release candidate version. I doubt it will mean a discount on the final version. That would be nice, but MS arn't known for their generosity!
It's a pity those that are running an activated version of Beta 2 arn't allowed to download future interim builds like build 5456. From what I've read, it's a noticeable improvement on beta 2.
But I guess RC1 is only a couple months (at most) away.

Score: 0

|

Activation in Vista is 100% anonymous just like it is in Windows XP. How will Microsoft know who activated their copy of Vista Beta 2 and who didn't? Microsoft also has NOT made any announcement that beta testers have to be running Vista Beta 2 on their computers just to download RC 1. As long as you've registered to get a copy of Vista Beta 2 you can be running Windows XP and still download Vista RC 1 when it's available.

Score: 0

|

serial numbers were emailed to you, im sure they are able to cross reference activated serials to emails. Im sure you can work the rest out.

Score: 0

|

I have it, love it, some of the best software I have ever seen. Very smooth and id put it up against any Mac OS. Its a bit different then the windows we all use, but the features in Beta 2 area already great - cant wait to see the final.

Score: 0

|

bt + 5456 = better......still some bugs though.

Score: 0

|

Don't waist your time with this alpha they call a beta!

Score: 0

|

Hey gawd, stick with Linux and openOffice... hahahaha stupid!

Score: 0

|

Rubbish gawd21!
It's certainly at a beta (albeit fairly low ) level. Maybe Beta 1 rather than beta 2? Build 5456 should have been beta 2. Room for improvement, but that's what a beta is for. Speed is faster than XP, although a clean install of XP would improve that a little. Stability is fairly good, although I do get an occasional crash to a black screen with the LCD monitor cycling on and off. Which is a worry if I was away from the PC, because the monitor switching on and off every few seconds would probably cause damage in a short time.
But as my GF4 Ti4200 card isn't up to scratch, chances are that is the cause?
A GF4 should be driver supported other than the 2002 dated driver that's in Vista as I don't game, and turn off all the annoying animations and effects, and the desktop looks OK to me.

Score: 0

|

waste, dude. waste.

a waist is your abdomen.

Score: 0

|

Kind of hard to install it when Vista crashes while trying to load the installer.

Machine Check error is the suck.

Score: 0

|

Well I downloaded vista beta 2, but some of the software I use does not support it yet. So if I don't install vista right now does this mean I won't be able to activate it later? That doesn't seem right.

Score: 0

|

I think what was meant is if you activate it before the cutoff date, you might be eligible for...stuff from MS. You should be able to activate it at any time.

Score: 0

|

I think what they are implying.. is.. that maybe they are thinking about anybody that has activated might get access to future betas..

but don't quote me on that, it's just a guess, can't think what else it might be..

Personally, i'm trying to get in the games beta program - I'm dying to test flightsim X

Score: 0

|

Well, I installed it on a spare hard drive and it doesn't support my wireless card, so I can't even activate it unless i get a 100ft lan cable.

Score: 0

|

Now that you mention it, that does make more sense than just not letting you activate it at all. Thanks a lot.

Score: 0

|

Activating it means you will be allowed access to the release candidate version. I doubt it will mean a discount on the final version. That would be nice, but MS arn't known for their generosity!
It's a pity those that are running an activated version of Beta 2 arn't allowed to download future interim builds like build 5456. From what I've read, it's a noticeable improvement on beta 2.
But I guess RC1 is only a couple months (at most) away.

Score: 0

|

Hope this doesn't mean that I can't activate vista after this week, I'm still waiting for my copy to arrive..

Score: 0

|

So you're confirming that you're actually one of those people unsuitable for using BETA software seeing as you didn't even do the rudimentary checks first.

Score: 0

|

Did you read my post? I used a SPARE hard drive, so it is not like I lost anything, and I did in fact look online about drivers and a few websites said to use XP x64 drivers which didn't work. I have no problem with a beta not working properly, but I do with one requiring activation if there will be such problems.

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

AOL's decision to rebrand as Aol. takes a bad brand and makes it worse

The idea behind the social Web is to crowd source before bringing out something new. But not at AOL, which new logo debuted with a cry of "fail!" across the blogosphere and Twittersphere today.

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."