Wash. Sues Spyware Software Scammers

By Ed Oswald | Published January 25, 2006, 2:19 PM

The state of Washington filed its first lawsuit under its new spyware law against New York-based Secure Computer on Wednesday. The action is a result of parallel investigations involving both the state attorney general's office as well as Microsoft.

The suit accuses the company of offering software that falsely claims the user is infected with spyware. From there, it makes changes to the computer to make it even more vulnerable to attacks.

Secure is accused of violating Washington's 2005 Computer Spyware Act as well as the state's Commercial Electronic Mail Act and Consumer Protection Act, as well as the federal CAN-SPAM statute. Microsoft has also filed a similar lawsuit in Washington court accusing the company of violations of the Computer Spyware Act as well.

The Redmond company is allowed to sue Secure through a provision in the law which allows providers of computer software and owners of Web sites or trademarks adversely affected by spyware activities to sue.? "Our investigations revealed that Secure Computer, its principals and associates advertised and distributed a product called Spyware Cleaner through spam, pop-up ads and deceptive hyperlinks," Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna said in a statement.

Charged in the attorney general's suit are company president Paul E. Burke, and Gary T. Preston, owner and webmaster of the Secure Computer domain, both of New York. Three others are charged with marketing the software: Zhijian Chen, of Portland, Ore.; Seth Traub, of Portsmouth, N.H., and Manoj Kumar, of Maharashtra, India.

The men marketing the software were paid up to 75 percent of the USD $49.95 fee to download the software as incentives to market it, the attorney general's office claims.

"We applaud Attorney General McKenna for his strong and sustained leadership in helping protect consumers on the Internet," deputy general counsel for Microsoft Nancy Anderson said. "It is encouraging to see our home state of Washington at the forefront of legislation and enforcement on these important consumer protection issues."

So far, Microsoft has collaborated with state attorneys general in California, Florida, Massachusetts, New York, Texas and Washington to stop various illegal online activities.

If found guilty, Secure may be forced to pay up to a USD $100,000 fine for violations of the spyware act, USD $250 per violation of the CAN-SPAM act, USD $500 per violation of the state spam act, and USD $2,000 per violation of the Consumer Protection Act.

Washington residents who bought Spyware Cleaner can request a complaint form from the Attorney General's Web site.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

DIE SPAMMERS DIE!

Score: 0

|

the RIAA and MPAA should jump in on the spammer-suing train, they're apparently so good at it.

Score: 0

|

Take them down.... we hate Spammers, hackers, spyware creators, virus writers. Give them all a 10-20 year rest behind the crow bar motel. Put them to work be a Lot More Creative... give them finger paint to play with all day long.

Score: 0

|

Agreed. What do you think about increasing the fines to about $10,000 per incident? Home users could lose valuable records and financial data trying to rid themselves of some of this malware. Small businesses could lose customer, sales, inventory, and employee data. We need to increase the fines dramatically. They should equal the fines for downloading and copying music or DVDs. Why should the RIAA members and supporters be treated better than the small business that does not have large financial resources?

Score: 0

|

What if a spyware company is based outside of the US?

Score: 0

|

It's nice to see the laws are working a little. The fines are way to low.

Ed, proofread please.

Score: 0

|

GOOD!!! Now get the bas****s that make WinFixer, SpyAxe, and Ad-Ware (not Ad-Aware) nailed too!

EDIT: Seriously, we need to get them all, they're actually making money by taking advantage of non-computer savy folks and causing the problems that they claim to fix:

http://www.spywarewarrio.../rogue_anti-spyware.htm

Score: 0

|

Exactly! Rake the SOB's over the freaking coals. Hopefully in the end they all burn in Hell!

Score: 0

|

Bing gets geekier with new Wolfram Alpha integration

Microsoft's Bing is now teamed up with Wolfram Alpha for computational search results.

HP to acquire 3Com for $2.7 B in cash, focus on China

A long and uncertain comeback trail comes to an end for the one-time network equipment giant.

Universities reject Kindle DX as a textbook replacement

Two universities running Kindle DX pilot programs have rejected the device.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Bing vs. Google rematch on video search

After Microsoft folds some old MSN Video features back into Bing, do they add to the search engine's functionality or take away?

New EU telecoms framework mandates user consent before getting cookies

Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want a cookie? No. Do you want...Are you annoyed yet? That's a preview of 2011.

The Samsung Intrepid: A nice phone, if you can accept Windows Mobile

Samsung appears to have built solid enough hardware, but it's the software that seems uncomfortable and unintuitive.

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.