One Million Wikipedia posts mean one Million times the world has been fooled into thinking that the posts were made by independent Wikpedia users. Actually these one million posts have been made by crooked Companies like Zedo who want to Use Wikipedia to proclaim to the world that they are Adservers and to hide the fact that they are Adwares who instal their rojan Horses to deliver the ads of their clients. These adwares do not share any revenues they make from their clients with the publishers of any webpages like the legitemate adservers like Google do.

Wikimedia is no longer non-profit organization. It is cheating and defrauding the government and IRS. The Wikipedia adminstrators get millions of dollars from the companies to write the articles in the names of Wikipedia Adminstrators who are known as Wikipedia Users. This writer is a new wikipedia Users who has become a frustrated Wikipedia user because his editing has been immediately reverted and removed by Adminstrator ZimZalaZim and eventually his computers were blocked on November 7, 2006 upon the complaint by Wikipedia User DoGooderJohnnyD on November 6, 2006 that Wikipedia user fakir005 (sock puppet of Wikipedia User Bimzalazim who must not be confused with Wikipedia Adminstrator ZimZalaZim). BimZalaZim compuer is now unblocked but he is not allowed to edit.

Our dependence on books is drifting away. When was the last time you went to the Library?

Great site but I still like the print.

Great !!!

I am quite happy that wikipedia has reached 1 Million articles. I am also expecting my mother tongue Tamil wikipedia will also reach more than 10, 000 articels by end of this year (Currently more than 2, 100 articels)

I wonder if there's an article detailing the changes made to articles by the people they're about. For example, Senator Dianne Feinstein's staff removed references to a scandal involving her husband--is there an article that makes note of things like that? Somehow I doubt it.

Yes?

http://en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia_Class_Action

"I wonder if there's an article detailing the changes made to articles by the people they're about."
---------------------------------------------
No one has the right to go in and modify or edit an article about anyone. And while Wikipedia allowed this to happen in the past I was happy to see that they no longer allow this practice. The only time a change should be made is after it has been verified, and verified again, by credible sources. I would want to know who posted the references to the scandal to begin with regardless of whom the scandal was/is about. Before Wikipedia stopped the practice of being able to edit willy nilly, the number of articles which were edited and changed was startling and many times the information was so far out in left field it was disgusting.

Wikipedia Posts 1 Millionth Article
.... of which only 3 are accurate and about 2 are helpful

Cynic.

You're assuming humor is not helpful.

agreed, it's completely useless

"You're assuming humor is not helpful."
-------------------------------------------
Humor? Give me a break, Tool.

the trouble is can we believe a Wikipedia article saying Wikipedia posts its 1 millionth article

Wake me when it reaches a billion.

Uncyclopedia: http://uncyclopedia.org/...danhill_railway_station

Don't believe a word of it. :P

lmao...

Always good for a laugh.

I particularly like their write-up on cats.

"Every year millions of dollars of damage is done when cats sit on cars or s*** on them."

Haha! http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Cats

ROFL