Zero-day vulnerability in PowerPoint spawns Microsoft alert
By Angela Gunn | Published April 3, 2009, 5:07 AM
Ah, the life of a security reporter: You ask Microsoft's communcations managers if the new PowerPoint vulnerability announced Thursday evening is a zero-day vulnerability, currently being exploited in the wild with no patch to shield us, and a spokesperson responds that "At this time, Microsoft is only aware of limited and targeted attacks that attempt to use this vulnerability." In other words, yes.
Security Advisory 969136 describes the new problem as one that can allow remote code execution if the file recipient opens an infected file. The Microsoft Security Research & Defense blog is rather more useful (not to mention straightforward -- yes, they're seeing it out in the wild, used in targeted attacks), recommending several defensive maneuvers while we await a patch. Those include using PowerPoint's newer version of XML, temporarily disabling the binary file format if your organization's using PPTX, and forcing legacy PowerPoint files to open in MOICE. Bloggers Bruce Dang and Jonathan Ness note that this is the first time Office 2003 SP3 (fully patched) has been successfully attacked in the wild since its release in September 2007.
One key piece of info missing in this report is: this exploit does not affect PowerPoint 2007...
Also, it should really state "SP3 for Office 2003 .. which has been released in Sep 2007". It puzzled me for approx 7.2 seconds that "Office 2003 SP3 has been released in 2007". C'mon, who bought Office 2003 in 2007... 99% bought Office 2003 earlier (no SP3) or bought Office 2007 when it was out...
Score: 1
|Hehehe strange score system we've got here. I was able to mod myself up (should not be allowed), but the stranger thing is when I modded myself down it ignored it! hehehehehe I guess the system (and we all know computers are NEVER wrong) refused to deny my greatness.
j/k ;)
Score: 0
|"Ahh I C" said the blind man. Sys simply doesn't let you CHANGE YOUR MIND. (Or probably more technically precise - REVOTE).
Score: 0
|Alas, our system is not Chicago-style -- just obstinate. (And believe me, I share your frustration, though on the whole I just wish the ratings system meant... something. Anything.)
Score: 0
|