z4 re-sues Microsoft over patents

By Ed Oswald | Published November 30, 2007, 4:53 PM

Just days after having its $140 million plus judgment against Microsoft upheld by the courts, patent holding company z4 sued Microsoft again over what it saw as insufficient progress in complying with the terms of the ruling.

Z4 says that Microsoft products continue to infringe on its rights to certain patents surrounding software activation. Microsoft has yet to comment on this latest salvo by the small Michigan company.

Among other things, the company is asking the courts to find Microsoft liable for infringement yet again, as well as unspecified damages. It is also asking for a jury trial and any other relief that the court may find z4 is entitled to.

"Microsoft's ongoing infringement of the z4 Patents is willful," z4 said in its complaint. The latest suit was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Tyler, generally seen as favoring the patent holder in cases of infringement.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

So because MS uses a form of activation to keep people from using their products its infringement?

There isn't a single company out there that doesn't have some kind of product activation to prevent said user from stealing.

Score: 0

|

this company's business plan must consist of buying patents and suing microsoft.

Score: 0

|

What again?
Big Bad M$ can afford lawsuits all the time.
Microsoft has always had Activition since Windows 98.

Score: 0

|

If Microsoft is knowingly and willingly infringing on z4's legal patent they should have to pay up the same as they expect anyone stealing Windows or Office to do.

Score: 0

|

Jesus f*cking christ a*sholes, just take you're g** d*** 140 MILL and BOUNCE! g** d*** this friggin greed is unfathomable!!! Thank goodness its microsoft they're suing or else I'd actually be a little upset.

Score: 0

|

Yikes!

Score: 0

|

You do understand that taking your Adderall with Red Bull and backing it up with espresso shots may be hazardous to your health, right. Okay, carry on.

Score: 0

|

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010

The latest round of changes launched today will impact how admins deliver services to e-mail recipients, and how much companies will pay along the way.

Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choice

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: No longer the phoenix rising from the ashes, Mozilla has carried on more than just Netscape's legacy.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.

Qualcomm: $1.3 billion Samsung licensing deal unrelated to fair trade violations

Samsung has come to a 15-year licensing deal with Qualcomm over 3G and 4G wireless technology.

Nokia's 'limited number' of recalled chargers exceeds 14 million

Today, the Finnish phone maker has begun a recall of mobile phone chargers that are a shock hazard.

Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustration

For those Wine aficionados out there, beware of the remote possibility that your Linux system could be infected by Windows-seeking malware.

Supreme Court considers patentability of abstract methods today

Can software that executes a formula for a business process qualify for federal patents? An appeals court already said no, and inventors are making their case.