Activity for June 16

<< - - Gremlin - - >>'s Profile

Member since July 29, 2008

  • Name

    << - - Gremlin - - >>

  • Location:

    Sweden

Favorite Files

Recent Posts

  1. Comment - Jammie Thomas jury empaneled, RIAA testimony begins

    (Jun 16, 2009 - 5:26 PM)

    I have no issue with paying a fair price for music or any other artwork... I take issue with the way these ambulance chasers decide what a fair price is and use the civil court system to scare extra money out of anyone they so choose.

    Choose http://magnatune.com ... you can be sure that the artist gets a fair cut of the revenue and support a label that supports its artists... not like these aging dinosaurs.

    As for $150,000/song these folks should be charged for being sub-human and deliberately extorting money from people that cannot afford it. (Doing this proves nothing and teaches nothing to others than contempt)

  2. Comment - RIAA defendant sanctioned for destroying evidence

    (Aug 28, 2008 - 6:50 AM)

    It's one thing to screw with the RIAA but a completely other thing to go against a court order....

    He deserves to get done just out of plain stupidity.

  3. Comment - Judge affirms takedown notice recipients' right to sue

    (Aug 22, 2008 - 9:42 AM)

    I understand and appreciate your comment... I was just trying to illustrate that people have been distributing this type of content for years... perhaps not by internet and it has never bothered anyone before.

    Our opinions may differ in that I don't believe that 26 seconds can be considered distribution in this case.

  4. Comment - UK law firm looks to begin prosecuting file sharers

    (Aug 22, 2008 - 7:06 AM)

    "Your notion that most share files in order to go out and buy that which they already have a copy of is utter nonsense."

    What a load of BS that statement is... your view of the world is so twisted.

    There are still honest people around.

  5. Comment - Judge affirms takedown notice recipients' right to sue

    (Aug 22, 2008 - 3:37 AM)

    ...it's funny....

    I don't ever recall the RIAA or MPAA suing families in the 70's and 80's because someone filmed their child dancing to music....

    This was not about commercial profit.... it was a mother being proud about her child.

    Copyright law needs to take into account intent... there was no malice involved.

    Get a grip.