KayNine
4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 6, 2009)
"minimal design with sophisticated technology", yes, that's right. I admit, I was sceptical, but it really IS a very fast browser. But the user interface and usability I do not like at all! And the themes are simply a joke, LMAO!!!
There are some really impressive showcases, but do they have any relevance to the real world? I don't think so...
Furthermore: I don't get the rush through versions... v4 already? Do they really need to get to Vwhatever soon? Sure v4 is higher than FF's v3.5, on par with Safari, still below IE8 or O10 *lol*
Honestly: I want to rate it fair, speed deserves 5 stars, but for style and usability I can only give 1 star (since there's no 0), which results in 2 stars.
10.10 Build 1848 Beta (Nov 6, 2009)
Small, fast, no big problems or disappoints since the first version (v3) I used. So no need to rate it low, though I don't need Unite. But i.e. DragonFly simply ROCKS if you're a web developer/designer!!
10.01 Build 1844 Final (Nov 6, 2009)
Using Opera since v3, never been disappointed by it. So a full 5 stars. Small, fast, great features -- also there's versions available for mobiles that work amazing. Other browsers are good, too, but Opera's perfect to me.
4.0.3 (4.31.9.1) (Nov 6, 2009)
A great browser for sure! On my Mac it's my absolute favorite, but on PC I do use it only seldom, using Opera since v3 and not being disappointed, it still is my choice.
Anyway: Apple (and the Webkit dev-team) did an amazing job! Browsing is really fun with Safari.
If only it's download size would be smaller, but that must be because of the libs needed to realize it's unique Apple-typical "feel" (GUI blending, skin, etc). Still no reason to rate it less than it deserves.
3.5.5 (Nov 6, 2009)
Well... I used Opera even before it was free, and I think I'll always will. But occassionly I also fire up Firefox, as well as Safari. I'd say: if it's not Internet Explorer, it's a good browser. Well... Chrome is a different chapter... I haven't decided yet wether it is to be trusted or not. Still I gave it a try and am not convinced at all by it's usability.
But for the other three (FF, Opera, Safari): they are good and on par, every one has it's advantages and disadvantages, we're not living in a perfect world. Choose by your liking, but rate fair!
3.5.5 (Feb 13, 2007 - 4:01 PM)
Nope, .NET Compact Framework is for WinCE. .NET Micro Framework is for much smaller "devices". .NET CF is for micro PROCESSORS, .NET Micro is for micro CONTROLLERS. Think of matchbox-sized network controllers or smart displays.
I visited the MS TechTalk "Embedded News" where they displayed some examples. In a few kB one can use many features such as networking, GUI features and more.
For example there will be laptops with .NET Micro powered displays on the outer side. When the laptop is powered on, the micro device can sync with the PC, i.e. appointments. When the laptop is switched off, the micro device could still be running to remind you.
http://msdn2.microsoft.c.../embedded/bb278106.aspx