Nudeman
No favorite files added yet
(Oct 30, 2008 - 8:19 PM)
nice addition, goodbye to 'autoit' and maybe 'windows scripting host', but still not so impress considering their competitor already implementing something worthy to look at the OPENCL..gigaflops? lets imagine 1 cpu (multicore?)+2 gpu (nvidia sli cards) > supercomputer?.
btw: im a pc (windows + ubuntu on virtualbox), my latest pc core 2 quad, 4gb ram, geforce 9800, vista home premium so stop the trolling and assuming things. i love windows just dont like the future its heading.
ray ozzie (MS) said: Vista to me is the culmination of the old way of thinking as the desktop should be," he said, and the fact that it came out in 2007, as the industry was s***ing from packaged software to Web-based applications, was "a huge disaster.
wtf are they thinking??
(Oct 30, 2008 - 1:01 AM)
i sense that troll who keeps saying he tested windows 7 pre-beta m3 (on VM?) and found it blazingly fast gonna come after you lol. He should read that link you posted too.
(Oct 29, 2008 - 10:02 PM)
windows xp for intelligent peoples who needs performance, vista/7 moving towards 5th element like community where people completely computer illiterate, they only know things like 'Computer turn on the light' - 'lights on'
lets just say you are asking a wrong person, the devs might give you different answer :)
(Oct 28, 2008 - 8:17 PM)
"Windows 7, even with its new features, will run equally as fast -- if not faster -- than Vista on the same PC hardware."
look at the title (lean and faster) and the fail-safe comment by mike nash at the end.
just imagin, bulky vista and thinner windows7 running at same speed? question is: to upgrade or not to upgrade?