Proteus73
No favorite files added yet
(Aug 11, 2007 - 8:49 AM)
I did check the facts.
From WikiPedia: "Caldera Systems, based in Utah, was founded in 1994 by Bryan Sparks[2] and Ransom Love [3]" And Utah is a link that goes to the USA's Utah.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sco_group
From the same page, about DR-DOS: "Caldera inherited a lawsuit against Microsoft when it purchased DRDOS from Novell in 1996."
And DR-DOS itself was originally developed by Gary Kildall's Digital Research and sold to Novell in 1991.
(Aug 10, 2007 - 11:06 PM)
"when Santa Cruz was acquired by Caldera, the Canadian company that at the time produced DR DOS"
From where that come from?
Caldera isn't Canadian and
It didn't make DR-DOS, it has buy it.
EDIT:
Ok, the article was updated and corrected about the Canadian root and DR-DOS creator. But now there is an error in "that itself had mounted a monumental challenge to Microsoft (that eventually went nowhere)". In fact, Caldera received an undisclosed amount from Microsoft for that "challenge".
(Mar 6, 2007 - 8:18 PM)
They forgot about MS-DOS + DoubleSpace/DriveSpace...
Or that Messager show us an ad...
(Feb 26, 2007 - 7:10 PM)
Of course, but it can be seen as an indication of who seek protection...
Anyway, the most important is that the spin Microsoft try to make can also be a counter-spin.
(Feb 25, 2007 - 1:47 PM)
If the deal existence is used by Microsoft to assert that Linux infringes some of its patents, then the other way must also be true: It's a proof that Microsoft infringes on patents owned by others.
Is it not Microsoft that approched Novell to make that deal?