Slimberg Jackson
United States of America
No favorite files added yet
(Sep 26, 2007 - 1:30 AM)
"There, the VoIP provider was ordered to pay Verizon $58 plus 5.5% in royalties "
$58 only? really?! hahaha, thats not too bad!
(Sep 7, 2007 - 10:19 AM)
stop ur crying. you obviously thought the iphone's value was worth $600. You felt it was worth paying $600 for the phone.
That has NOT changed. You still have the product that you felt was worth $600.
Now that other poeple get it cheaper, u all of a sudden DONT think the phone is worth $600?
ur a crybaby, ALL of you are. Greedy whiny a** crybabies.
(Sep 6, 2007 - 3:05 PM)
HAHAHAH $400?
its amazing that there are stuffy a** old men sitting somewhere in a board room convincing themselves that people on the whole are going to make them rich by paying $400 for something ELSE to sit in their living room entertainment centers. Only people who'd do dumb ish like that are the computer illiterate, who wouldn't be able to USE it in the first place
(Sep 6, 2007 - 2:54 PM)
"If you didn't think the iPhone was worth $600, why did you buy it? If you thought it was worth $600, what are you complaining about, you got the value you expected."
(Sep 6, 2007 - 2:25 PM)
can we get some consistency with these articles ED?!
from HD DVD Claims 'Undeniable Momentum' (http://www.betanews.com/...ble_Momentum/1189094089) you say "Despite lagging behind Blu-ray in both sales of discs and overall players, HD DVD still put on a happy face for..."
but in THIS article, you say "HD DVD has been able to consistently keep its competitor at bay with cheaper set-top players, where it holds a 2-to-1 lead in sales."
Which is it gonna be, Ed? Does HD-DVD lead in players sales or DONT they?
(i realize someone has mentioned this already)