Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - AOL Spyware Protection

   2.0 Beta 7 (Aug 21, 2005)

   WOW thats all i can say lol
   
   I guess the AOL comercials where true they do stop spyware this is way better then 1.0 to bad tho i was reading tokar's review and i dont think its free i think you got to be an AOL member to get the updates.
   
   plus who knows it still in beta once it goes live it will go just for AOL members.
   
   they still need to put in the discription of each item ur blocking but i guess that will come in the next release.
   
   But in good part this program rocks cleaned up my system from things other programs could not get now i surf the web faster.
   
   Thank you AOL

2. 
   Review - Messenger Plus! Live

   3.40.112 Beta (Dec 3, 2004)

   it think this update is cool cuz now instead of going to the site or having to come here it lets u know that there is a new update.
   
   bad part is that it has a bad spyware yes but this is y i click on no i do not wanna to support and just install the freaking thing.
   
   i mean i kinda find it hard that ppl dont see it that its about to install the thing not only does it give an opti0n but it SHOWS A PICTURE FOR THE PPL are slow.

3. 
   Review - Windows Messenger for Windows 2000/XP

   5.1 (Dec 2, 2004)

   why do they even bother with this version if they already got 6 and 7

4. Comment - Apple 'has not rejected Google Voice application,' says it rejects 20% of submitted apps

   5.1 (Aug 23, 2009 - 2:51 PM)

   sorry but thats just stupid for any company to say that they are involved in privacy acts to unleash the information that ppl submit for other use then what it is intended here yes i know if you unlock the iphone the google app can be useful in so many ways but i doubt you can cause WWIII cause there is reports that the unlocking of the iphone and these apps can take over cell phone towers?
   idk but its stupid and
   
   if this were true the feds would not be bothering apple the heat would go str8 to google on what there intentions are but the case here is that apple knows what its doing rejecting all apps that have to do with a large profit gain there was a dude who sold nothing but 99cent apps made millions cause all he did was make cheap apps and sold it for 99cents apple after this mishap they deiced to ban and remove the apps he made why is my question i mean yes he made cheep and useless apps but yall got to think about that one
   
   apple and att will be under str8 problem and i think this will further open the door for other companies to handle the iphone or make it so that the unlocking of the iphone is never penalized
   cause i see no problem with the google voice just that apple is mad that they came up with a better app then what there whole os cant do so yea i know apple and steve jobs will have to suck mad balls to gain back what they lost so far but i doubt thats going to happen any time soon cause this is going to open a huge hole that no one in apple or att can get out of

5. Comment - Could Intel stop Nvidia from producing chips for Nehalem?

   5.1 (Feb 19, 2009 - 1:19 PM)

   i think all of this is stupid if nvidia has something better that would cut production cost of another chip doing the work i would say congrats to nvidia and go with it maybe say give me 70mil to get a license for our cpu architecture design but to do this to a partner is like saying to a man who cured cancer
   
   got the boot from his job cause he knew what would the risk be " to many ppl getting the idea that nvidia is on to something good"
   
   if intel wins this suit it would kill nvidia there new hybrid SLI tech is off the chain brings ATI to there knees but i say if this were to happen i would suggest to nvidia to stop its relations with intel since they are so worried about losing there partnership with them and just go with the flow take intel and flush it start working with AMD since they charge low prices for the same chips intel has
   i know that amd is 1 gen behind but if nvidia were to group up with amd it would change alot
   
   ~ quote from apple insder~ ( http://www.appleinsider....of_future_chipsets.html )
   
   Speaking to AppleInsider, the Intel spokesperson said discussions to prevent a drawn-out legal bout had actually been ongoing for "more than a year", and the chipmaker hopes the dispute "will not impact other areas of our companies' working relationship."

6. Comment - Xbox 360 Netflix queues missing Columbia Pictures films

   5.1 (Nov 20, 2008 - 7:26 PM)

   Haha
   
   omg i knew this would happen
   when sony announced that ghostbusters was going to be exclusive with the ps3 and excuse my french **** the rest
   
   now sony is xbox envy and dont want to share license rights for M$ to have anything to do with its motion pictures being streamed over its network
   
   pitty as this could have brought up more sales in there library ppl dont think that money is always the solution to everything and if this were the case i am betting bill gates would chuck money at sony for them to whipe there tears on how Xbox out beats sony in online game play and its service over all
   
   as of right now the NGE sucks cause its not fully working to its standard with netflix

7. Comment - Serious PayPal Flaw Disclosed

   5.1 (Jun 17, 2006 - 3:14 AM)

   ok how stupid is this this pay pal scam has been out since the begining of this year and they are dealing with it now
   
   i am saying how stupid must you be to fall for such a thing i mean pay pal even disclose in fine print tho saying that at any moment they will not ask for any personal or account information via e-mail
   
   plus this num nut prolly got one but always deleted it till one day he said hmmm might as well check it out
   
   stupid ppl today i bet every one around the world even the ethiopians must have gotten this email and said nope sorry bulk mail report spam
   
   get smart ppl dont get screwed over via internet

8. Comment - Symantec Closes Open Door for Viruses

   5.1 (Feb 10, 2005 - 3:02 PM)

   well i got no clue everytime i use Norton's Av i never had a problem with virr but even if i did it did its job to remove it and no problems from there.
   
   other then that i think it sucks that this came out even after cnet.com put it to the test with Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security 2005 alot of ppl thought that prog was hot compare to Norton's Av if u want to check out the reviews http://reviews.cnet.com/...ml?tag=nl.e497#talkback