Thomas Ditmars
United States of America
2.1 Build 17350 Beta (Nov 19, 2009)
Please note: The 2.1 development branch is classified "Alpha". The 2.0 development branch is the "Beta" and the 1.8 branch is the "stable". Separate pages should be made for 2.0 and 1.8.x.
@sehnbadt:
uTorrent and BitTorrent are not spying on you. Their partnerships with the corporations you mentioned involve software that has nothing to do with the uTorrent or BitTorrent clients. Please refrain from posting this unfounded FUD in the future.
6.3.308 (Aug 12, 2009)
doPDF works just fine; I've used it for a long time and actually got my work to adopt it as a standard tool a few months back.
us3r has a history of downrating excellent programs and appears to be spamming on this one. (I don't care how bad you think a program is, don't advertise another one on a review.)
4.0 (Jul 19, 2009)
@everyone giving low ranks because of certain "features" lacking:
This program is not intended to do those things (i.e., pagefile) and the author specifically states as such. That's a bit like downrating MSPaint on the merit that it doesn't open Photoshop files.
This program is still good, although it does seem to run a bit slower than the parent program (JKDefrag).
1.8.3 Build 15571 Beta (Jun 3, 2009)
Softpedia is bulls***. The toolbar is optional, and is easily ignored by people paying attention to the install process. If you are NOT paying attention, or do not know how avoid installing optional components that are not required to complete installation, you might want to learn a bit more about such things before using a peer-to-peer file distribution application.
1.8.3 Build 15571 Beta (Sep 12, 2005 - 7:35 PM)
Improvement on their own model, perhaps?
1.8.3 Build 15571 Beta (Sep 10, 2005 - 2:17 PM)
Oh yeah... That would have been good -- If I hadn't been at work all day the day I found out, so when I finally got to the site there was this big message saying "Sorry, we're not giving out reg codes anymore".
Sorry, but that don't cut it.