Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. Comment - XP SP3 speed lead over Vista SP1 narrows under similar workloads

   (Nov 28, 2007 - 3:55 PM)

   Fast as Office 2007. And just as friendly. And it is so cheap. Bill is still laughing at you guys!

2. Comment - XP SP3 speed lead over Vista SP1 narrows under similar workloads

   (Nov 28, 2007 - 3:55 PM)

   Of course Vista is a pig. It was designed to run on more hardware, that's the partnership they have to keep consumers buying more hardware. Who cares what version of Office, as long as it does what it is supposed to do. Sadly, 95% of users out there can hardly cut and paste, and wouldn't know how to design a page layout no matter what tools they had available. So you have to spend hundreds more just to get Vista to run, not to mention spending hundreds just to purchase it. And who mentioned buying all your peripherals again just to get them to run on your computer? That is so stupid. Vista is crap, everyone knows it. Here it is a year later, and people are still recommending not using it. Rightfully so. I am not a *nix fan, but once they get the installation, UI, and apps, I will switch. Add up all you spend to get Vista to run, compare it to XP, factor in the cost difference, and it's only a "mere" 82% worse? Only tards support Vista.
   Paris Hilton, name your daughter VISTA. She will be pretty, expensive, do little, be high maintenance, have poor performance, not work well with others, and fool some of the people all of the time.