bb
No favorite files added yet
(Sep 17, 2008 - 7:32 PM)
I think Mozilla is simply protecting the "identity" of it's product. It isn't like closed-sourcing code.
Moreover, if others are to create their vanilla version it cannot then be considered the "firefox" of Mozilla. So, vanilla versions need to have their own trademark and identity. It sounds fair.
The community may simply be surprised of a EULA that's posing at their screen. I could attribute that with their problems of Microsoft EULAs. But certainly, the EULA of Mozilla isn't Microsoftish -- people simply recall bad experience.
;-)