Activity for October 14

Activity for September 25

Activity for September 20

Activity for August 8

Activity for May 29

flip007's Profile

Member since May 29, 2009

  • Name

    flip007

Favorite Files

Recent Posts

  1. Comment - First public Opera 10.1 beta competes against its predecessor for performance

    (Oct 14, 2009 - 1:18 PM)

    New Opera Beta is not faster but it's slower by my test with Peacekeeper.

  2. Comment - Microsoft's Windows 7 House Party prep video is a real party pooper

    (Sep 25, 2009 - 12:14 PM)

    They said install W7 couple days before, thats funny the upgrade can take couple days yes.

  3. Comment - Why I chose Windows 7 over Snow Leopard (and you should, too)

    (Sep 20, 2009 - 6:15 AM)

    MAC is for real production users
    Windows is crap but good for industry
    Ubuntu is my favorite and saves me a lot of time
    About games who cares about that just get PS3 slim and you're off junky M$.

    PS: Some software is completely the same on MAC and UBUNTU like Transmission and PDF view so why buy MAC just get some ACER laptop and install Ubuntu and that's that.
    http://my.opera.com/Filip007/blog/

  4. Comment - Windows XP SP3 runs browsers 13% faster than Windows 7 RTM

    (Aug 8, 2009 - 12:47 AM)

    Edit on my post -> 4) Opera 10 (very close to Firefox) not Safari!

  5. Comment - Windows XP SP3 runs browsers 13% faster than Windows 7 RTM

    (Aug 8, 2009 - 12:25 AM)

    I have loaded Chrome 3 with latest update and runs pretty much the same on XP or 7.
    What's your bench soft are you using Peacekeeper with divider X or some Java latency test.

    My test by Peacekeeper are: faster to slower
    1) Safari 4.0.2
    2) Chrome 3 (very close to Safari)
    1,6X slower are
    3) Firefox 3.5.2
    4) Opera 10 (very close to Safari)

    Yes XP can add some like 13% i can go with that but this will not effect loading so who cares about XP. Problem with XP are that people will be using this for a very long time.