Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - Archetype

   2.0.0.33848 RC1 (Jul 16, 2004)

   UKB
   
   I dont know if you reviewed the site and its information corrrectly.
   
   1. The BETA versions are in fact free, the price goes into effect once we have finished beta testing.
   2. The requirements on this page list ".NET Framework 1.1" this should not have been a suprise.
   
   I' am not aware of any other apps that does everything out app does. Our Dynamic Image Scaler for instance creates thumbnails and downscales images for visitors w/ no storage space needed.
   
   More webhosts are starting to carry ASP.NET 1.1 due to the fact the open source Mono project www.go-mono.org has already been released version 1.0.

2. Comment - USPTO to Review Microsoft FAT Patent

   2.0.0.33848 RC1 (Jun 12, 2004 - 8:05 PM)

   So you believe all Software patents are stupid?
   
   Patents protect products that were uniquely invented that took tons of time to research and create. Why is software any different?

3. Comment - AOL Reaches 'Tahiti' with Client Upgrade

   2.0.0.33848 RC1 (May 18, 2004 - 12:59 AM)

   Agreed....
   
   AOL is a poor excuse for an ISP, expensive, and a waste of computing power...
   
   Why should you need to denote any resources outside DUN (or other networking compents built into windows) to browse the internet?
   
   Maybe AOL can do themselves some good and save a few million dollars by not mailing everyone those stinking CD's.

4. Comment - Connectix Virtual Machine Tech Sold to Microsoft

   2.0.0.33848 RC1 (Feb 23, 2003 - 4:20 AM)

   Interesting,
   
   You are all looking at this from a close minded standpoint. MS has many reasons to support and promote the VM ability with linux and MS. Would be alott easier to advertise Windows Servers to enterprises as they could slowly migrate to Windows servers without the loss of legacy software and increased hardware costs. MS had already annouced a VM core into Windows Server codenamed Blackcomb due after longhorn, this just seals that rumor.
   
   MS software is not as buggy as you all are even making it seem. You have to blame developers that code for MS technologies. A fresh install of MS products are very solid for their deployment base. After you add drivers and apps from various sources you began to obtain an unstable system thats not MS fault.
   
   I personally feel this is a great buy from MS as i can see it allowing people to run more technologies on todays ever faster pcs. MS will either fully implement it in windows core or keep it in the server side and sell it as a standalone for professional users it wont become "weaker" or "crappier".