Benjamin's Profile

Member since December 2, 1999

  • Name

    Benjamin Angerer

  • Location:

    DE

Favorite Files

Recent Posts

  1. Review - PrimoPDF

    3.0 (Feb 14, 2007)

    lacks options, tries to connect to the net, has problems embedding postscript fonts

  2. Review - JavaZip

    1.0 (Mar 17, 2006)

    haven't tried it, ignore the rating.
    just wanted to ask:
    beos isn't java enabled, so how can it work on this os ?

  3. Review - PearPC

    0.40 (Dec 21, 2005)

    @dizzy_davidh:
    and why does your opinion make pearpc a bad app (in your opinion?)
    just because you think it hasn't much sense, the app itself doesn't necassarily have to be bad, has it?
    anyway,
    i think it's a great emulator; helped me many times using some little tools only available for mac...(even though it isn't very usable with really big apps)

  4. Review - FreeBSD

    6.0 (Nov 5, 2005)

    i used freebsd in several environments now and i can tell you it is a really professional system giving you everything you expect from a unix. i wouldn't say it's a perfect desktop os but that's not their aim. if you need a stable, performant and clean unix use it, for desktop use some desktop os; i can't stand the "imposed" feel of x-guis

  5. Review - BSPlayer

    1.32.820 (Jun 23, 2005)

    great player with really, really good quality.
    only the interface is really ugly... but this is something to argue about ;-) ... i just prefer apps complying to the native system look....

  6. Comment - XP Won't Run on Intel MacBook, iMac

    1.32.820 (Jan 12, 2006 - 11:14 AM)

    afaik, efi is at least as programmable (on software-side) as openfirmware was... so i think it shouldn't be a big problem to write some app similar to what xpostfacto does for oldworld-powermacs that are not longer supported by os x/ppc.
    only the partition table could be a problem, yes.
    but who knows ?
    maybe we could patch some of xp's .sys-files with the reactos ones (which could be made compatbile to'efi-partitions') - as soon as ros is xp compatible enough.....
    only speculation, though.
    but if efi is as flexible as intel says, there won't be anyone who could permit accessing the efi shell and place some bios compatibility script.
    we'll see.

  7. Comment - Palm OS 6 Shipped to Licensees

    1.32.820 (Jan 19, 2004 - 4:05 AM)

    i wonder how much Be,inc. is in this os