tay jf
Malaysia
No favorite files added yet
9.50 Build 9523 Alpha 2 (Sep 15, 2007)
Question from improvelence :I cannot understand how this ** ** *** has so many fans?
Answer:Performance and usability.
Working well so far.But some issues still there..
9.50 Build 9500 Alpha 1 (Sep 5, 2007)
Beyond doubt,opera 9.5 has become faster!
http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/
Site worked even more but not that stable yet.(alpha)
waiting for the final:)
2.0.0.5 (Jul 30, 2007)
i like its clean interface,but there are no useful feature builted in.so i dl extension,it is useful,but what extensions bring me was memory hog and messy UI(not the way i want).
Fast rendering but not the fastest.
For sure it is not the most secure browser.
In fact,this is an oustanding internet browser.
9.22 Build 8796 Beta (Jul 7, 2007)
Working great for me,didnt experience much crash when hangin around with it.(beta thought)
Worth a try!
Waiting for the next release 9.5 (kestrel),:)
Which will contain many cool new features, improvement of existing features, and lot of bugs fixed.
2.0.0.4 (May 31, 2007)
Agree with bigmama,i cant use firefox without some extension installed.And yet there are a thread claims that"Popular add-ons to Firefox are the latest criminal attack vector" on cnet lately.
http://www.download.com/...723824-12.html?tag=head
There has been some discussion today regarding what to do with the Firefox bloat, sparked by a Wired article.
Mike Schroepfer, Mozilla’s VP of Engineering, says “Other software, add-ons, extensions and other things can impact performance.”
Since extensions are written and developed by 3rd parties and not maintained by Mozilla, there are no guarantees that they won’t contain any memory leaks or have a negative impact on the browser’s performance.
..................
overall, ff is safe, gecko is a good engine, and generally does the job. So i give ff a rating of 3 stars as it is (not with plugins and extentions)