lantzn
No favorite files added yet
(Apr 13, 2007 - 4:09 PM)
Sexist arguments??, hmm I didn't read that in his comment. Someones overly sensitive.
By the way there are many articles written BY women who comment about the ratio of men to women in grasping technology and gadgets. Most men are tinkerers and most women don't want to be bothered with it. There's nothing sexist about it, it's just what interests a person.
I've converted many people to Macs and haven't found that much of a learning curve issue.
(Apr 13, 2007 - 3:51 PM)
Well thought out articles.
http://daringfireball.net/2007/04/bottleneck
(Apr 13, 2007 - 3:47 PM)
"So i guess i'm trying to say given the chance, i would own both a Windows based PC and a Mac. I find one no better than the other, but both are great in their own way."
Which is why all you'll ever need is a Intel Mac running either Boot Camp or Parallels with the WinOS of your choice. You can now kill 2 birds with one stone. I've used both side by side professionally since 1986 and it's never been better to own a Mac. Besides before OSX my Macs use to crash often, though I was pushing them to their limits with huge graphic files in Photoshop.
(Apr 13, 2007 - 3:38 PM)
When Avie was with Apple he said that 10.4 would be the last OS they would release on such an agressive timeframe. OSX has matured and while Apple shouldn't sit on their laurels they will be releasing their OS upgrades not so often. That's fine with me I would rather save a buck and have a stable OS then something rush so often.
Yes but the difference between 10.1 and 10.2, etc. are major upgrades like going from Win95, Win98, XP, XP Service Pack V, er I mean VISTA.
Apple seems to like holding onto the X (10) moniker instead of moving onto 11, 12, etc. like with pre-OSX systems (6, 7, 8, 9).
(Jul 10, 2006 - 5:42 PM)
How do both those browser handle the acid2 test?
http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/