Darl's Profile

Member since April 15, 2005

  • Name

    Darl McBride

  • Location:

    United States of America

Favorite Files

Recent Posts

  1. Comment - Groklaw's Jones Confident Amid SCO Deposition Summons

    (Apr 9, 2007 - 8:43 PM)

    >> By hatruong
    >> She lies about this vacation, sh

    You have proof this is a lie?

    The way we have proof Darl lied about millions of lines of code?

    Mountains of literal copying?

    3 teams of deep divers?

    About BSD being in violation?

    About BSF working "on contingency"? (they were NOT on contingency - even Laura Didio admitted that she was lied to about that. Funny she never admits she was used as a complete tool, by Darl and Sontag, her reputation left for dead.)

    About having enough evidence to go to court 3 years ago?

    About Caldera (dba SCOG) not being the Utah corporation Caldera but rather the California corporation Santa Cruz Operation? Even after Judge Wells ruled SCOG is not Santa Cruz Operation?

    >> She lies about this vacation

    You have proof this is a lie?

    I hope you're not Daniel Lyons, and I hope the source of your "proof" is not Maureen O'Gara, who seems to burn with a white-hot hate for PJ.

    Lyons does too, or so it seems.

  2. Comment - Groklaw's Jones Confident Amid SCO Deposition Summons

    (Apr 7, 2007 - 4:45 PM)

    SCOG fed Lyons and O'Gara sealed, confidential information - that SCOG's lawyers swore to the court they would not release.

    Groklaw never showed that kind of information.

    http://www.groklaw.net/a...?story=2007040623380173

    All of us who have been watching this fiaSCOG for a long time have known this is typical of SCOG - accuse innocent others of what SCOG did with prejudice, malice aforethought, and absolute, complete lack of ethics.

    And beyond feeding reporters who hate Linux and/or IBM with secret, confidential information, let's not even get into using "friendly" analysts who hate Linux and/or IBM (Laura Didio and Rob Enderle) to push SCOG's lies and FUD onto the public.

    We know that Enderle at the very least has admitted to being paid for his opinion (no direct admission in the SCOG case yet, though - although since Enderle has stopped supporting SCOG one might guess he's not being paid anymore).

  3. Comment - Groklaw's Jones Confident Amid SCO Deposition Summons

    (Apr 6, 2007 - 6:38 PM)

    >> Suspicion of improper access to public
    >> documents is clear evidence

    How can public access to public document be improper?

    you mean non-public?

    That's a Good criticism of MOG, Didio, Lyons and Enderle.

    Thanks.

  4. Comment - Groklaw's Jones Confident Amid SCO Deposition Summons

    (Apr 6, 2007 - 6:25 PM)

    IBM did not depose Laura Didio, despite Didio pushing many SCOG and MS lies and FUD ("SCO has a strong case", "Darl and Sontag anre not showboats - they wouldn't do this if they didn't have a strong case", the indemnity stuff)

    But SCOG needs to depose Pamela Jones, who has never echoed anything from IBM? (hard to echo anything, since IBM has said nothing).

  5. Comment - Does Open Source = Closed Mind?

    (Apr 17, 2005 - 5:18 PM)

    >> and you intenion in your posted comments is to
    >> offend people with hostility

    One guy below called me a liar. Since I could tell he was not a BS slinging blowhard I answered him civil-ly.

    The only people I've been hostile toward were hostile first, and in some cases repeatedly, before my hostility came out.

    You, on the other hand, began the name-calling and hostility immediately (the pit bull appelation symbolizes red-neck aggression). Isn't it interesting that you accused me of anger a full day after I pointed to your obvious anger?

    This again shows you're quite good at projection. That goes hand in hand with not being able to see in yourself what you've projected.

    You made provably false accusations, repeatedly, that a 2 second search would have proven were untrue. And yes, when you make accusations, it's up to you to do a little legwork.

    Again, I invite anyone who has the stomach to read this entire exchange to go through it and count the number of misdirections, issue-ducking, non-sequiturs (which includes posting of useless links that add no new information) and name-calling.

    from both sides & reach your own conclusions.