Emil Simunovic
Canada
No favorite files added yet
4.0.211.7 Beta (Sep 23, 2009)
ninjeratu how old are you? you should really try before you write another word here. You mas be one of same group of people with comment "nothing new in Win 7". Anyhow, Chrome is doing extremely good. Getting more and more features and washing bugs out in every version. Bookmark sync is killer feature. Still, there is a lot to do but far better then any other browser out there. 6/5 stars from me...
1.0.1 (Jul 28, 2009)
All in all the best player around. Some little thing are missing but nothing I can't live without. mkv container playback is kind a cheese, please fix that.
6/5 from me :o)
3.0.193.0 Beta (Jul 13, 2009)
Nothing to complain, everything is looking better and better. Maybe a little slow but but this is very "young" browser.On end this will be "The One" browser :o)
2.0.172.2 Beta (Apr 6, 2009)
Better and better...
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/
2.0.170.0 Beta (Mar 18, 2009)
Hey Dhry! Who is we? And you are?
LOL some people are trying to make a point by talking in the name of everyone...
Chrome is far from "the best browser" but that's just personal taste anyway. This browser is not going in the good direction, Chrome is flying in the good direction. :o) Simplicity, speed and original ideas are things I like. Shore, lots of tings are still missing but all of that is on the way. This is still baby browser with just basic features. Looking froward to extensions.
2.0.170.0 Beta (Jul 17, 2009 - 9:09 AM)
"Imagine a peer to peer model where you got paid to seed a torrent, and had to pay every time you leeched. "
Sorry, I just can't find my self in this anymore. TPB will go down like blink of the eye. This is just another example of primitive human brain. Money, money, money. Helloooo Mininova :o)
2.0.170.0 Beta (Mar 13, 2009 - 3:01 PM)
That's just great. What version of Chrome is used in the test? Probably 1.0. IE7, IE8 RC1, Opera 10, Safari 4 beta, Firefox 3.1 beta 3 and just Chrome, no version? Probably the slowest one 1.0. Thats is just not right. But there is for sure reason for that, are you guessing????
Here is more realistic bench http://www.futuremark.com/peacekeeper
2.0.170.0 Beta (Dec 12, 2006 - 4:32 AM)
The whole thing about paying/cracking operating systems is crap. We should pay somehow that operating system together with hardware. Lets say another 1-10% more on any kind of hardware. This way all people will pay whatever OS they are using. If M$ have 90% of operating system then they will got 90% of that 1-10%.
Also for home users that percentage should be smaller then for business use.
Also all that crap with 1001 versions of Vista... All that are just more or less simple features which one suppose to be easy turned on/off in installation or after. The price of $400 for the full version of Vista is really ridicules. if Is XP about $150 why is Vista $400? Is this complete new system with 250% more source code? I don't think so.
And then if basic version is about $200 why is just couple features another $200? The system is more important thing and everything else making that system more usable.
Another example of stupidness is that Vista Basic is not for games. If my 5 years old son just do basic thing on his computer I probably need to go with Premium Edition of Vista? What a joke. Welcome to future.