Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. Comment - EC renews its anti-competition objections against Intel

   (Jul 18, 2008 - 10:55 AM)

   Now that is a brainwashed and prejudice point of view if I ever heard one. I don't feel that way about any country out their. Who has the real problem?

2. Comment - Microsoft to Bundle Games with Xbox 360

   (Oct 9, 2007 - 11:58 AM)

   I don't know why the cheerleader pitdingo believes we think its the end of the world that MS is number two in the console race. I don't care how they rank as long as they all stay in business and provide enough competition to keep prices down. I don't own any machine at the moment since I'm to busy to enjoy them right now, but i'm glad the competion exists and so should everyone else.

3. Comment - Sony Sued Over PS3 Cell Chip Technology

   (Aug 1, 2007 - 4:47 PM)

   Thanks for your comment and I also agree with you regarding some of your points. I have heard of the companies that seem to make collecting patents and sueing other companies the basic model of their business. But for those that can keep a history of effort to get their idea on the market should still be able to hold their patent. Lets just say that had to submit X number of proposals per year to try and get their product funded and they would have to show rejection letters so their patent does not expire. A time limit on patents that leaves no options could still be abused. I just believe that a person should be given a chance to prove they are actively trying to market a product.

4. Comment - AT&T to Offer Mobile Music Downloads from eMusic

   (Aug 1, 2007 - 1:23 PM)

   What service offers that? I could use the info.

5. Comment - Sony Sued Over PS3 Cell Chip Technology

   (Aug 1, 2007 - 12:57 PM)

   I would like to think if I came up with something inovative I could have the protection of a patent to protect me until I got the funds or the investors to support my idea. If patents didn't exist, how would the average person be able to come to market with it if anyone could steal the idea. Where is the incentive for the investor to help an inventor if they can just steal the idea legally. If anything, the patent office should be responsible enough not to approve patents to multiple parties that could end up in a law suit, if they do they should be liable.