Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - KeePass Password Safe Professional Edition

   2.0.8 (Jul 6, 2009)

   "Good, but net must go."
   
   This is like shouting at the wind. NET. is here to stay and expand. It certainly will not go anywhere. Because of .NET the KeePass can now run on Linux, Mac, BSD without need for contributed/unofficial KeePass builds.
   
   "I honestly don't see any need for need, especially because we all know that author is an amazing coder. So why use net?"
   
   Okay, so you admit that the guy is a world class programmer, but you still tell him how he should code?
   
   What is exactly the problem that you have with .NET?

2. 
   Review - Adobe Shockwave Player

   11.5.0.600 (Jun 17, 2009)

   "pretty much useless these days, stick to just installing flash player"
   
   Ehhh... what? :/
   No one is asking anyone to install it just for the sake of having it. If you need it, - install it. If not, - then just don't.

3. 
   Review - Adobe Reader for Windows 2000/XP/Vista/2008

   9.1.2 (Jun 11, 2009)

   Vulnerabilities should be fixed and rolled out as soon as possbile without wait for any "Patch Tuesday". So what Adobe does, is showing that they care. Kudos!
   
   So, for the majority of people who already have latest updated Reader 9.1.1 it would be better to download whole thing again, and not just a small patch?

4. 
   Review - Google Chrome for Windows

   3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)

   All you 1-star raters, you do realize that this is alpha build (and not beta as listed) that suppose to have problems, including small font bug?
   
   IMO, BetaNews must not allow rating of beta or at least alpha grade software, as judging from comments, most people are rating bugs and not a product. If you are using a pre-release software that is not intnded for general public, then please be at least a little bit objective in your ratings. And help make software better by reporting them to a developer, instead of ranting about what is known to be a problem.

5. 
   Review - Adobe Reader for Windows 2000/XP/Vista/2008

   9.1.1 (May 27, 2009)

   johnusa, if you would look at the "Requirements" line (below screenshot), you would see that it does say, that Adobe Reader v9.1 is required.