Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. Comment - Spamhaus Won't Pay Alleged Spammer

   (Sep 20, 2006 - 12:53 PM)

   Blah blah blah... Probably another spammer... what's your e-mail domain so we can add you to the blacklist. Better yet, Betanews needs to add a comment blacklist. I vote you #1 on the list!

2. Comment - Spamhaus Won't Pay Alleged Spammer

   (Sep 20, 2006 - 12:48 PM)

   The courts should have exercised even the smallest bit of common sense and just thrown the case out to begin with. If for nothing else than the fact that they had no legal grounds for ruling on a UK company.

3. Comment - Spamhaus Won't Pay Alleged Spammer

   (Sep 15, 2006 - 3:14 PM)

   I doubt that e360 is as innocent as the case history they published on their site leads you to believe. SBL and ROKSO got added rather quickly to blacklists after they started becoming e360 suppliers.. Why was this? Because now they were broadcasting spam. 'Nuff said.
   
   Spamhaus may handle complaints about errors in its system as well as Paypal handles complaints in their system. Which is basically, not at all. But at the end of the day, it is their business and it is up to the individual to stop using their service.
   
   I don't think the US courts should be able to rule on this. ISPs and end users choose to use Spamhaus. If Spamhaus chooses to say they are spammers that should be fine. Sucks for e360, but guess what? I really doubt they are as innocent as they lead you to believe.