Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - Soccer Pro

   Beta 2 (Jan 19, 2004)

   intresting program...few bugs but all in all...good program

2. 
   Review - Tag&Rename

   3.0 RC6 (Nov 16, 2003)

   Great program...best i've tried so far but i'm still open to finding a better renamer. But still overall it is a great program

3. Comment - Critical Flaw Found in Apple's iTunes

   3.0 RC6 (Nov 18, 2005 - 10:42 PM)

   you are all missing the point of the article...iTunes was not hacked, the flaw already existed someone just found it. No one hacked iTunes and made it shi**ier it always was that way, the flaw just wasn't discovered untill now

4. Comment - Critical Flaw Found in Apple's iTunes

   3.0 RC6 (Nov 18, 2005 - 10:39 PM)

   um...your comment makes no sense...

5. Comment - iTunes Tracks May Increase in Price

   3.0 RC6 (Nov 16, 2005 - 8:49 PM)

   Alex has a point. I'd much rather download the music for free of the net, and if i ever see the artists on the street...hell i'll GIVE them the money. I'd rather have the artists make the money than the fat cat record labels and the RIAA.
   
   Think about it, the artist makes the music, does all the work, has the tallent. The recording studios put up money for the studio, marketing, editing, and labeling. The RIAA does...um...does...uh...takes the money, and...um...uh...um...yeah thats it. THE RIAA ARE A BUNCH OF FAT PIGS! I would be much happier if it was a 50/50 split between the artist and the record company.
   
   One thing i find ironic...the people making the music don't even own their music. Even their music is controlled by the music companies!

6. Comment - TigerDirect Sues Apple Over New OS

   3.0 RC6 (Apr 28, 2005 - 10:12 PM)

   In our sue happy society, Tiger direct has the right to place a lawsuit when they feel like it so long as it falls within the statute of limitations (don't know if there is one for trademark infringement). But I think Apple deserves to be sued because with all their money they could have easily researched it FIRST to see it is it a suitable name. As for suing Tiger Woods I don't think that's possible because that is his name. Its like if your name was bill Clinton and you made a site billclinton.com. The former prez can not sue you because you have a right to that name as it is yours, but if you reserved windows.com before Microsoft did just so you could sell it to them, they can sue for trademark infringement.
   
   I say go for it TigerDirect. Use the law to its fullest extent. Its the reason you pay taxes, its the reason you live in this country. If you don't like it, MOVE!