Zukester
No favorite files added yet
(Feb 14, 2007 - 3:27 AM)
Are you awake?
One thing lacking in all of everyone's post is actual thought.
Just a moment's thought would reveal the only simple and logical idea:
---Hold the ATTACKER responsible---
And no one else.
A no brainer. Otherwise, it is like suing every police officer in town if your home/car/office is broken into, and you will not hear of anyone "arresting a perpetrator"!
You do not need any one to be arrested (because maybe its too much work to find, prosecute, extradite them, etc. and SOMEONE has to pay!)......so you want someone ELSE to blame.
Like holding teachers responsible for getting shot at or stabbed when kids get violent/deadly in class and do not want to learn.
Like holding parents responsible when their forty year old gets in trouble.
Like holding doctorsresponsible because you get a disease for doing something unprotected.
This liberal country completely lacks actual ideas like personal responsibility like it had fifty years ago. Going to the dogs (libs).
"Gub'ment is the opiate of the people."
You want it? You'll get it. And more, until you puke. It killed Rome, it is killing us.
Founding fathers make excellent eggbeaters right now.
This was once a country of responsibilities, not just rights. They must go hand in hand, like the framers said.
Now it is just rights and laws, laws, laws, laws, suits, suits, suits, -and "others" responsibility.
Next we will need (then require by law) IT Manager insurance, Firewall insurance, Router insurance, Packet insurance, Hacker insurance, LAN Lawyer insurance, a Network Legal Department, network cable insurance, network card insurance, Proxy server insurance, RJ45 insurance, Server Insurance, Database insurance.
Caveat emptor (Let the IT Manager beware) is gone, "who do we blame/sue?" and "Bring me the no-perpetrator's head!" is in.
Zukester